chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Efim Geller vs Andrija Fuderer
Gothenburg Interzonal (1955), Gothenburg SWE, rd 18, Sep-14
Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Geller/A Fuderer games
sac: 13.Nd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-07-05  ughaibu: This is an amusing attack, partly queenless, but couldn't black have drawn much of the sting by taking the knight on move 18? he'd have plenty of pieces for his queen.
Aug-07-05  percyblakeney: An interesting game to let the computer chew on for a while. 17. ... Nxb3 looks like a good move for black, the preferred line: 17. ... Nxb3 18. Nf5 Qc5 19. Nxg7+ Kf8 20. Bh6 Kg8 21. axb3 Qc6 22. f3 Bc5+ 23. Kh1 Ng4 24. fxg4 Qxh6 25. Nf5 Qe6 and black will maybe not have it too comfortable, but after all he's a piece up and Fritz says -2.31. In the line played in the game 26. Rd7+ would be more forcing for white (mate in 5), after Rc7+ black could have held out longer with 26. ... Kg6 (27. Rd6+ Nf6 28. Kxf2 Be4 and white is only a pawn up but should be winning fairly easily anyway).
Aug-07-05  percyblakeney: ...and as for taking the knight on move 18, as <ughaibu> suggested, the computer then gives the position as equal but still prefers Fuderer's move (which doesn't have to mean that it's better...).
Aug-07-05  sitzkrieg: What about 15..Kf8 (Geller) ?
Jul-31-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: "This game with Andrija Fuderer is a striking confirmation of this. It took place in the 17th round, and was preceded by the follow­ ing circumstances.

After starting the tournament with a win, in the next nine games I did not manage to gain a single victory, whereas I lost three games, and after eleven rounds I was sharing places 15-19 out of the 21 competitors.

It was stipulated that the first nine players would go through to the Candidates Tourna­ment, and all I could do was to pin my hopes on the second half of the event. Experience told me that to my 4 points I would have to add a further 7-8 out of 10, in order to be one of the nine. This would not have been easy, even if I had been in good form. And if my form was letting me down, without drastic chess measures such a result was simply impossible.

It is true that by the game with Fuderer I was already sharing 7th place. But, firstly, he was a rival, and was only half a point behind me. Secondly, a win would practic­ally ensure me a place in the Candidates Tournament. And thirdly - and this is perhaps the most important factor - from inertia I was unable to switch suddenly to quiet play "with the draw in hand". Finally, there was the obligation of having the white pieces . . . ."

-- Geller

Nov-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: I can't believe Fuderer passed up 24....Bxc6. If 25.Kxf2 Ng4+. If 25.Rd6 N2g4 26.Rxc6 Nxh6 27.Rxh6 Kxg7. Am I missing some trick?
Nov-18-15  saturn2: <zydeco I can't believe Fuderer passed up 24....Bxc6 If 25.Kxf2 Ng4+. If 25.Rd6 ...> Did you also look at 25 Nf5 threatening Ne7? A possible line could be 25...Re8 26 Rf1 Ne4 27 Nd6 Rf8 This is not a computer analysis (I dont have one) but white seems to have still attacking chances.
Nov-18-15  ndg2: 24..Bxc6 25.Nf5 (mate on e7) Re8 26.Rd8!! (Threathening again mate on e7, without defence actually)
Nov-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: <saturn2 and ndg2> Nice! That's a really pretty mate. Good catch.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Check equals mate
from The Application of Chess Theory by xajik
Check equals mate
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964
BEST CHESS GAMES - PART 2
by Holadola
Check equals mate
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol
Game 40
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Qindarka
Grandmaster Geller: The First Quarter Century
by Resignation Trap
Mil y Una Partidas 1950-1959
by K9Empress
Interzonals 1955: Gothenburg
by capybara


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC