chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Efim Geller
USSR Championship (1959), Tbilisi URS, rd 13, Jan-31
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Wormald Attack (C77)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 37 more Spassky/Geller games
sac: 31.Bxb4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-19-04  ughaibu: This is a great game, Geller leads Spassky on and I was expecting him to catch everything and somehow come out ahead, but Spassky with a surprising queen sacrifice shows that Geller had given him too much rope.
Jan-22-04  ughaibu: No views on this one?
Jan-22-04  Benjamin Lau: 18. e5! sticks out in my mind. 7...d5 is a novelty according to the opening explorer. It may have been opening preparation from Geller that Spassky avoided by playing the (intentionally?) unambitious c3 instead of dxe5 leading into a wilder Marshall-ish Ruy position.
Jan-22-04  TrueFiendish: 28.Ne4! An artist's move.
Dec-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: How much did Spassky see when he played 28 Ne4?

Instead of taking the queen, Spassky had to foresee the Geller's possibility of grabbing d4 with check!


click for larger view

If 31...Bxd4+ 32 Kh1 Rxh8 33 Bxd5+ Ke8 34 Bxa8 Kd7 35 Rd1 Rxa8 36 Rxd4+ Kc8 37 Rc1 a5 38 Be7 Qh5 39 Rc5 Qg6 1.51/17 Rybka


click for larger view

Notice the white pieces have all sprung to life in the second diagram while the Black pieces seem glued to same squares.

Jan-18-09  GlassCow: Fascinating, complicated and brilliant play by both heavyweights. This is getting added to my favorite games for certain.
Jan-18-09  computer chess guy: 34 .. a5!? 35. ♘e6+ ♔c8 36. ♗c5 ♔b8 (Rybka 3, depth 16).
Jan-18-09  xrt999: did Geller lose on time?
Jan-18-09  blueofnoon: I do not think so. Geller realized 3 minor pieces are indeed better than the queen and resigned. A terrific game!

With shorter time control, it is difficult to see games like this these days.

Jan-18-09  veigaman: Spassky, one of the greatest of all time!. This game is a human masterpiece!
Jan-18-09  talisman: <veigaman> you are correct sir! thanks!... for this is some ballgame!
Jan-19-09  Granny O Doul: I'm betting it was a time forfeit.
Jan-25-09  xrt999: Ok....here goes. 4th try.

I plugged this end position into my CM program: CM vs CM, and the game continues for 63 additional moves and ends in a draw.

Cheers CG.

Jan-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  stoy: If this is a win for white, how does it happen? I smell a flag fall.
Jan-25-09  Ychromosome: Check out the white knight on f2 that enables castling.
Jan-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: To those who don't see how white can win this:

I'm no expert, but it seems that black's b-pawn is about to fall. After it's gone, white's king and minor pieces will gang up on the remaining black pawns. Then one or more white pawns march up and promote. The white pieces and pawns should be able to shield the king from perpetual check. All black can do is sit back and watch it happen.

Jan-26-09  ughaibu: It looks a clear enough win to me and the time control would probably have been at move 72, so I see no reason to doubt that Geller resigned.
Jan-26-09  positionalgenius: its a win for white. truly magnificent game.
Jan-26-09  M.D. Wilson: Why would Geller want to play on in a losing position? Hence the resignation.
Jan-27-09  xrt999: This game is a draw!

(I mean, after the b-pawn falls that is. (thanks Gregor for pointing out this to all of us))

The black queen just continually harasses the white king and the game continues for 63 moves and ends in a 3 move draw on my CM. (63 moves of perfect 10 ply engine play)

This was my initial assumption, and I just proved it to myself for the second time. Wether or not Geller saw this drawish nature or not is not so much dependant on playing 63 perfect drawing moves as it is already having played 73 grueling moves against Boris Spassky. Although the year is 1959 and Geller is in his prime, how would you feel after not only 60 moves against Spassky, but 10 additional moves only to lose a pawn? Spassky played perfect.

Then to sit there and analyze wether or not you can draw....no one here can say. Geller probably did resign, and this wouldnt suprise me.

BUT....just run it through whatever engine du jour is popular and see for yourself, there is no clear win. This game is a draw.

Jan-27-09  xrt999: <Jan-19-04 ughaibu:>

<Jan-26-09 ughaibu:>

Hey, why dont you just think about what I said and come back in 5 years....sheesh....LOL!

Jan-27-09  I Like Fish: Why...
did...
Geller...
lose...
this...
Jan-28-09  blacksburg: this is a pretty clear win for white, but your engines aren't going to show it to you.

white wins the b pawn, then slowly advances all of his pieces and wins the g pawn, then the h pawn, then makes a queen. the black queen will not be able to stop it, and there will be no perpetual checks because white has a small army of 3 pieces to escort the king.

no way black will draw this. it might take 50+ moves for white to win, but he WILL win, the queen is no match for the 3 pieces here.

and in general, if geller and chessmaster disagree about something, i'm going to believe geller. i mean, this isn't deep rybka 10 we're talking about here, it's chessmaster.

Jan-28-09  ughaibu: Xrt999: do you want to try playing it out, on here?
Jan-28-09  M.D. Wilson: I'll go with Geller's assessment of the position.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
USSR Championship, Tbilisi 1959 Rd.13
from Favorite Games from (1944-1959) by wanabe2000
Efim Geller and 23 USSR Ch tournaments
by Chessdreamer
USSR Championship 1959
by suenteus po 147
Fightingest games
by ughaibu
Q:BBN
from 52d_Middlegames_3 pieces for a Queen by Jaredfchess
Q:BBN
from 52d_Middlegames_3 pieces for a Queen by whiteshark
Q vs 3 minor pieces Endgames
by Baby Hawk
2B+N vs Q
from Positional masterpieces by arsen387
Spanish Game: Morphy Def. Wormald Attk (C77) 1-0 Emm's 54.?
from EG Minors Excavating the Elements by fredthebear
54.? [Answer in Kibitzing]
from John Emms' Ultimate Chess Puzzle Book Set 2 by The Last Straw
Queen sacrifices 1
by obrit
Beautiful combinations
by Gregor Samsa Mendel
GlassCow's favorite games2
by GlassCow


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC