Spassky vs Geller, 1968

THese guys have apparently really hammered out a certain pattern in the closed sicilian that they want to get their forces into. There are probably lots of ways the opening can go so maybe not worth too much time.

Spassky in fact is in a formation that would do any hypermodern proud. Usually it is black players that you see with all their forces in a little bunch and then they break out on you. Ultimate hypermodern play vs a hypermodern defense.

Spassky plays 14 Qe2 in this game, later on in game 6 he played 14 b3 which is interesting. THe Q movements in the two games are somewhat different but Geller never really gets his out. Even though it is nice to have the Q on e8 to protect f7 from the mate, maybe it ties down the Queen too much? SOmethign to think about.

Evans makes this a big deal in his comments on game 6. Saying that RPxN is a mistake. Maybe a small one, but it can't be a huge deal and Geller has apparently worked out a whole plan for the sicilian based on certain moves; he plays them repeated in all the games in the series , and this recapture w/ RP is probably one of them.

IT is probably too much to ask a human player to make one tiny improvement in his game when he has probably adopted a style of play that is best for him and maybe adopted to the way his opponent thinks.

Geller is actually playing much better here in the early going he does not waste too much time on the queen side. Instead of extra knight maneuvers (in game 6) here he moves the QR up and down, but only twice and it's no big deal.

NOte how the mating threats against the fianchetto'd K are different than in game six because the Q is back there to protect f7. So the enemy Q or R cannot go to h7 and then f7 w/ check. This was a problem in game 6. Since this threat dwill not allow the B to capture the N on f6.

In this game 4; it is possible to first capture the N w/ BxN.

Look at the capturing that goes on d5. WHy not start with the N?

28....Nxd5
29. Qh4 Nf6
30. exf6 exf6
31. Qh7+ Kf8
32. Bxb7 fxg5
33. Qxg6 Bd4+
34. Kh1 Rxc2
35. Bxg5 Rh2+
36. Kxh2 Qe2+
37. Kg3 Qxf1
38. Bh6+ Ke7
39. Bg5+ Kd7
40. Qf5+ Qxf5
41. Bxc8+ Kxc8
42. gxf5 b3
43. Bc1

THis is a line on the chessbase computer w/ a non computer move that starts it off. It goes from small time bad to big time for white by move 40 or so. At least according to its numbered score.

Now this is not prove that geller should have won this game. Or that I can play chess with a computer.

It is a good example of how it can all go wrong for white. And may give us some idea of how Geller could have kept his game alive for a lot longer.

In addition the computer also shows how tricky playing the fianchetto'd sicilian is for black THis concerns the tactical problems of blacks fianchetto'd k side: Start with the same sequence but retake w/ the Bishop on f6

28....Nxd5
29. Qh4 Nf6
30. exf6 Bxf6??

ANd it's mate in 3!

Or so my solid state partner informs me. This is also an example of computer chess.