chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Ernst Gruenfeld vs Akiba Rubinstein
Merano (1924), rd 3, Feb-06
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation (D48)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Gruenfeld/Rubinstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Unless I'm badly mistaken, this game is the reason we call it the Meran. Poor Grunfeld. He plays reasonably--and he gets walloped, because reasonable won't work in this variation.
Nov-18-06  Karpova: Another great opening innovation (sure, much more than just an innovation) from Akiba Rubinstein!
Jan-30-07  Archives: <Another great opening innovation (sure, much more than just an innovation) from Akiba Rubinstein!>

The Meran Defense,one of the most complex queen pawn openings, was also entirely Rubinstein's idea, but it was named after a place rather than a person. And of course, all the great players have played this complicated opening (Kasparov, Karpov, Kramnik, Anand).

Developments in the opening are a bit of a tempi struggle and related to the orthodox defense: for years, Black's c6 was considered a wasted tempo since c5 would ultimately need to be played. Capablanca (and Showalter) demonstrated that the tempo lost by c6 was offset by White's extra tempi used moving the king's bishop. Ultimately, the source of White's advantage is Black's "problem child" bishop: the Meran would seem to confound that problem for Black, with the hedgerow of pawns on white squares, but he's often able to free himself and equalize the game.

8.Bd3 a6 9. O-O c5! which was Rubinstein's idea to transpose into a solid defensive variation of the Queen's Gambit Accepted, with the only difference that both Black and White have used an extra tempo to reach the position.

"An enormous complex which embraces a large body of theory. Black's chances are sufficient for equality." BCO2

Aug-26-07  cannibal: <An Englishman: Unless I'm badly mistaken, this game is the reason we call it the Meran. Poor Grunfeld.>

One of the reasons, but not the only reason. If it was just this game, then maybe we'd call it the Rubinstein Variation. The clou is that Gruenfeld himself copied Rubinstein's play just two rounds later (Spielmann vs Gruenfeld, 1924) - and also won!

Aug-26-07  euripides: <entirely Rubinstein's idea>

There's a case for attributing it to Osip Bernstein:

Capablanca vs O Bernstein, 1914

Aug-26-07  euripides: ... or Perlis:

Schlechter vs J Perlis, 1906

Aug-26-07  Karpova: Or Lasker
Steinitz vs Lasker, 1897

Here's a Chess Note by Edward Lasker dealing with the Meran Defense (mainly the false assumption that Tartakover popularized it at Meran 1924 also) http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Rubinstein deserves much credit for his hard work on the opening (he contributed so much to opening theory) and he was also the one popularizing it - as <cannibal> mentioned Gruenfeld adopted the opening himself in the same tournament.

Sep-09-10  Murphyman: Never mind all the opening stuff folks.

What about 28. Bxe5 as a move!!??

Think it should be a CG problem of the day someday

Dec-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: [from Sep-05-04]
<An Englishman: Good Evening: Unless I'm badly mistaken, this game is the reason we call it the Meran. Poor Grunfeld. He plays reasonably--and he gets walloped, because reasonable won't work in this variation.>

This is indeed the game generally recognized as the first Meran Defense [Counterattack].

Grünfeld’s <9. 0-0> is plausible (and the second most-often played choice in the CG database, with 125 occurrences at this time), but it is weak. (Black scores 56%, specifically: White wins: 28%; drawn: 32%; Black wins: 40%.) There is just too much happening in the center for it to be advisable for White to castle here.

Grünfeld did at least play <10. a4>, which gets back to a position with a plus score for White amongst games currently in the CG database. It is nevertheless better for White to play <a4> on move <9>, since the pressure against the b5-pawn then forbids <9. … c5>.

[BTW, in the CG database, <9. a4> has scored much better than <9. e4> (by 66.7% to 54.9%): Opening Explorer, but given the size of the sample, this does not prove it is actually the better move.

Dec-29-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Interestingly, with <d5> on either move 25 or move 27, Grünfeld would have been doing OK. His <27. f4?> was an instantly losing blunder, giving up material for no compensation.
Mar-31-12  Karpova: Btw, this was not Akiva's first Meran - this one is: Teichmann vs Rubinstein, 1923
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game 406
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Qindarka
Game 85
from Hypermodern Game of Chess (Tartakower) by Qindarka
58
from Veliki majstori saha 11 RUBINSTEIN (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
It _should_ be named the Rubinstein Defense, not the Meran.
from Slavs more SLAVS, Semi-Slavs, the whole Sha-bang by fredthebear
Rubinstein's Chess Masterpieces
by yesthatwasasac
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation
from Queen Pawn Games by RayDelColle
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Var (D48) 0-1 36
from Game collection: GDQ by fredthebear
Rubinstein's Chess Masterpieces
by Karpova
Akiba Rubinstein's Best Games
by KingG
Dry Rubinstein
by Gottschalk
Semi-Slav
by KingG
Semi-Slav, Meran
from Is the Universe without an End ? Chess is not ! by arielbekarov
406
from 500 Master Games of Chess III (part 2) by alachabre
p126 - Birth of QGD Meran - Akiba Rubinstein
from Mednis: Strategic Chess by setuhanu01
It _should_ be named the Rubinstein Defense, not the Meran.
from Fire Baptisms by Nasruddin Hodja
G406
from 500MGC3 by morwa
Akiva Rubinstein
by Archives


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC