chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Gulko vs Anatoly Karpov
USSR Championship (1976), Moscow URS, rd 13, Dec-16
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Szen Variation (B44)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Gulko/Karpov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-15-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Gulko sets a stalemate trap. Karpov ignores it and responds with a rook move setting up zugzwang, and then another Rook move setting up an unstoppable mate.
Oct-28-14  tranquilsimplicity: Karpov is the greatest Chess scientist (positional) who ever lived! We don't yet agree as to who is the greatest Chess artist (tactical); but names like Tal and Bronstein spring to mind. As for the greatest universal player that combined the art and science to arrive at universality of Chess style, my choice is Fischer. And when we say artist or scientist, we do not mean to suggest that the artist does not know or appreciate the science of chess, and vice-versa. It simply means a tendency in playing style.#
Oct-28-14  Petrosianic: <tranquilsimplicity: Karpov is the greatest Chess scientist (positional) who ever lived!>

You can tell that just from this one game?

Oct-29-14  tranquilsimplicity: <Petrosianic> No. Not just this most interesting game but after studying quite a lot of his games. I must admit that my comments are meant to incite debate or responses. And I have been successful since you have responded.

The reason I feel that Karpov's strategic mastery is slightly above that of Petrosian, Capablanca, Kasparov and Lasker, is the fact that Karpov dominated a much stronger field of competitors or super grandmasters. Then there is the fact that Karpov's games are so scientifically (-positionally-strategically) slanted, that one fails to notice what is going on. His feel for high strategy and microscopic manoeuvres is superior to that of any other in my opinion. Karpov asserts this but adds that Petrosian may have been the only GM that could match him (Karpov) in this scientific (ultra-positional) approach.

I also could have added that Lasker and Kasparov can along with Fischer contest for the greatest player with a universal style. In fact Emanuel Lasker in my opinion may easily be the strongest if not greatest player who lived; but I don't want to go there. It's a pity that Lasker is not really accorded the respect I feel he deserves in Chess history. And it is a pity that Fischer had even refused to include Lasker in his top ten greatest players; however with Fischer's issues with anti-semitism it may not be difficult to see why Fischer felt that way.#

Oct-29-14  Petrosianic: I didn't agree or disagree with your claim, I just asked what about this game supports it (apparently nothing). But if it doesn't, then why didn't you post the comment on a page that would support the claim?

<And I have been successful since you have responded.>

You just want to get an answer and don't care what it is? Are you sure you want to say that? You could yell "Fire" in a crowded theater and get that result.

Oct-29-14  tranquilsimplicity: <Petrosianic> Karpov calmly repels Gulko's attack refusing to fall for Gulko's tactics. And when Gulko's attack is spent, Karpov unleashes simple tactics of his own .. Nxb4, ..Nxf3, ends going up an exchange where with the greatest ease paralyses Gulko on the rim!

It is this paralysing or strangulating effect that Karpov exercises with perfect mastery game after game, that I am "singing hymns" about. And I thus sought opinion on the game and Karpov's style. And when I made the great claim, I did so with awareness that it is my opinion only and many others may feel differently hence my very relaxed attitude regarding soliciting opinion.

And yes...you might say that I do not really care about the answer because there could never be an answer or "truth" where people's opinions are concerned. But I still enjoy to know what another might think. I might even be swayed by another's view.

And no; I am not that desperate with regard to inciting a response. Being no arsonist I am interested in provoking comment on our beautiful game; Chess.#

Oct-29-14  Petrosianic: Good. That's good. Now, when you say Karpov didn't fall for his tactics, are you implying that they were on the cheap side? A coffeehouse attack, if you will? Or that they were reasonable, but Karpov just saw deeper?

Another thing worth mentioning would be that the ending of this game is remarkably similar to the ending of Game 1 of the Karpov-Spassky match, except this time Karpov was on the winning side.

Oct-30-14  tranquilsimplicity: <Petrosianic> I am implying that Karpov saw deeper. Gulko is one of the few players to have a plus score against Kasparov, and I believe the only GM to have been a USSR and USA Champion. It would be unwise to think of Gulko's tactics as 'Coffee-house'.

Yes..the first game of Karpov v Spassky match in 1974 had a similar ending. It was a rather fiery game but unfortunately for Spassky, his only win.#

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Szen Variation (B44) 0-1
from Kar pov 12th World Chess Champion by fredthebear
Karpov plays a great game
from Karpov at the 1976 Soviet Championship by chessgain
Karpov plays a great game
from Karpov at the 1976 Soviet Championship by positionalgenius
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Szen Variation (B44) 0-1
from Sicilian Taimanov / Paulsen Poked Fredthebear by Patca63
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by Psihadal
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by amadeus
Karpov 1976
from Behind the Iron curtain by Open Defence
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by chessgain
Sicilian (Black)
by chazsmiley
USSR Championship 1976
by suenteus po 147
Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Szen Variation (B44) 0-1
from Sicilian Taimanov / Paulsen Poked Fredthebear by fredthebear
estrategias 2 de suetin
by LESTRADAR


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC