Mark Hebden vs Keith Arkell (1987)

Mark Hebden vs Keith Arkell
Lloyds Bank 1987 · Caro-Kann Defense: Panov Attack. Fianchetto Defense (B14) · 1-0

To move:

Last move:

explore this opening	find similar games	13 more Hebden/Arkell games
	PGN: download \| view	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: The feature find similar games (see link above) will show you lists of games with similar openings.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Jan-08-10		fm avari viraf: Both these GMs are familiar faces to me since my participation in various prestigious International Chess Tournaments at Hastings, England for many years. Once, I lost to Hebben in the International Blitz at Hastings. Now, to the game, both of them played some cunning moves but in the end Hebben's passed c-pawn turned out to be a menace & threatened to win a piece. After Black's 25...Rc2 26.Rd7

Apr-07-11		GIAaron: In King vs Arkell, Watson Farley Williams '88 Black improved with 25...Rc8, and drew comfortably.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!

If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
No personal attacks against other users.
Nothing in violation of United States law.

See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)