chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian vs Vlastimil Hort
Hoogovens (1971), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 8, Jan-21
Indian Game: Anti-Grünfeld. Advance Variation (E60)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Petrosian/Hort games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-22-07  patzerboy: Can 12...b6 be considered the losing move, or is it two moves later (14...Qxb6)?

I don't like 20...Qh3 much, either.

I think it is fair to say that Hort was schooled in this game.

Jul-22-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: 12..Nc7 (idea ..Na6) might have improved.
Apr-13-11  xombie: Beautiful game, much of which I don't understand.

Position after move 15: Black has open b file, blocked Bg7, potential f5 break (which is never played). Had this occurred in one of my games, I might have been nervous, owing to b3 hole, b file action and square creation if b4 by white.

But note that the b4 break is obviousness in itself, and it is based on which white's whole strategy rests, in conjunction with the weakness on a6 and the fact that c5 cannot be occupied. Black's pieces are too disorganized to sit on c5. However, black still has f5, and for reasons that are not apparent to me, does not play it. I think f5 is met by exf5 and f4 maybe.

Anyway, back to more obvious ramblings. 16. Bh3(!) anticipates movement of knight, prevents f5 indirectly (for he can then fix the pawn with f4 and attack it with Nh4. Also, effects trade after knight moves - excellent considering that the Bc8 is often the cause of grief in KIDs. It also leaves black with the very useless Bg7.

One possible plan for white is to anticipate f5 and then nullify the Bg7 with f4 .. e4 and Bc3, but this does not seem to bite much I think. If I interpret this correctly, the key is to prevent f5 - which is done brilliantly with 20. Ne3!. Point is, 20 ... f5 leads to the preventive combination 21. exf5 gxf5 22. Nexf5 Rxf5 23. Qe4 which wins the rook (I wish I could see those in my own games - I've been very proud of them when I get them).

After f5 is prevented, white goes ahead with his own plans. b4, etc, and collapse occurs.

Can someone explain the purpose of 26. Kg2? It either has to mean 'pass' or something else (such as denying the Q the h3 square). I also think that black is close to zugzwang at this time.

This tells us that black was already nearly lost by move 15, or needed something active and dangerous.

Sep-26-11  Caissanist: This is nicely annotated by British IM Andrew D Martin on Jeremy Silman's website: http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_b.... The idea is that 3.d5!? can work for white if the king's bishop is fianchettoed and white plays a slow, squeezing game. According to Martin, white has a big advantage by move 13, and black is busted by move 21.
Apr-21-12  LoveThatJoker: GOTD: Having a Vlast!

LTJ

Jan-15-16  Caissanist: The Martin article is gone from Silman's site, but still available in the Internet archive: https://web.archive.org/web/2012051... .
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round Eight, Game #62
from Wijk aan Zee Hoogovens 1971 by suenteus po 147
Game collection: E64
by Chessdreamer
Petrosian v. the Elite
by refutor
Power Chess - Petrosian
by Anatoly21
Petrosian v. the Elite
by rbaglini


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC