chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Friedrich Saemisch vs Borislav Ivkov
Busum (1969), Buesum FRG, rd 10
Modern Defense: Queen Pawn Fianchetto (B06)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 2,501 more games of Ivkov
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-20-03  Benjamin Lau: By the time of 10... Bb7, the game almost becomes a battle of ideas. White plays a stereotypical "classic" game while black plays a stereotypical "hypermodern" game. In the end though, the better player still wins. (Sorry Samisch fans but it's 1969 now- Samisch is too old. Capablanca and Alekhine, some of his famous contemporaries, are long dead and Fischer is now the new talk of the town. This is the last game Samisch plays according to the database.)
May-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: Benjamin Lau: age was not the only factor here - in Büsum 1969 Sähmisch lost ALL his games on time... this one is evidently drawn whith carefull play
May-01-04  drjimmy42: So I've seen this a lot, where someone resigns even though I can't see any glaring problems. Granted black is bearing down on him in terms of territory, but what was so awful about his position that caused Samisch to resign at this point?
May-01-04  WMD: Comment would be superfluous.
May-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: WMD: sorry, but here comes a superfluous comment - drjimmy42: in this game a player should play 40 moves in a given time, controlled by a so called 'chess-clock', its more than likely that Sähmisch spent all his time till move 32... (read my comment above) PS: about the stories in Fritz Sähmisch page: hä-hä-hä
May-01-04  Benjamin Lau: True vonKrolock. Samisch was legendary for his poor management of the clock in long games. It was through sheer paradox that he was one of the best lightning chess players of his time.
May-03-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: B. Lau, thanks for driving my atention to this game; Sähmisch play is very impressive against a much younger opponent... The assertion in my first kibitz is not fortune-telling the past; I. Chernev states the event in his "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess"
May-03-04  Benjamin Lau: Agreed, although using clock time wisely is an element of a superior player.
May-04-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: i know the Bronstein-Zeitnot (that of the creative player); the Reshevsky-Zeitnot (the tactical); and there are others - like the Korchnoi-Zeitnot, so well explored by the "hero-of-socialist-sport" AK in Baguio 78 - are those chessplayers "inferior"?!
May-04-04  Benjamin Lau: In a sense, yes. I don't understand why this is so difficult for you to digest. This is not correspondence chess and even correspondence chess has its limits. You can feel sorry if "Player A" lost / drew a very good position, but time is still time. If "Player B" had used as much time, do you think that "Player A" have had been able to establish such a good position in the first place? You cannot just take time out of the equation vonKrolock.
May-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: (where writen "explored" above please read "exploited") Well, <Lau>, i'm accepting perfectly the fact that time limit plays an important role in competitions; only i'll prefer the terms 'more/less efficient'; furthermore, comfirming what asserted above, this game is intersting for the particular dialetical discussion started since the overture, but remains as an unfinished product ... i'm sure that to not be unfair whith Ivkov's talent, another of his own game not decided by a mere sporting factor will surely demonstrate that he was a superior player
May-08-04  Benjamin Lau: Well obviously I only meant "superior" within the context of sporting results vonKrolock. Ivkov won the game, and has the better tournament record overall. While I think "more/less efficient" is just a euphemism (if we all had infinite time, we could all play like Capablanca, no? Where would "superiority" be then?), I agree with you though of course that this was not really a decisive proof that Ivkov is better.
May-11-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: <B Lau> ok, draw? - Yes Ivkov is a very talented player... i could have followed live one of his games, but in that day (during a tournament), Najdorf provided a brilliancy <Filguth-Najdorf 1978> (see here) and off course all my atention was in don Miguel`s game!!
May-11-04  Benjamin Lau: Filguth vs Najdorf, 1978 is the game you referenced, nice attack.
Oct-22-15  m.okun: Saemisch in Buesum: +1=1-13. In all lost games he delayed time.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
B06 White Geller System B-QB4; Black Hippo... P-QN4 & ... P-QB4
from How d'ya spEll Hipoptamus? Is that 1 'p' or 2? by fredthebear
Clash of ideas
from Picturesque Positions by Benjamin Lau
My 62 Memorable Kibitzes (or Kibitzen?!)
by vonKrolock
White B-QB4; Black ... P-QN4 & ... P-QB4
from Hippo --- White Geller system by saintdc07
pawn-b5 hippo
from Hippo games!! by RiverAkira


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC