chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Janowski vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), Berlin GER, rd 4, Nov-17
Queen Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 18 times; par: 39 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Janowski/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-27-05  Caissanist: Many of the games of the Lasker-Janowski world championship match have a kind of hilarious sameness to them:

Lasker plays some outrageous move (21...h5!?) designed to lure Janowski into launching an unsound attack against Lasker's king.

Janowski falls for it.

The attack fails.

Lasker collects the point.

Apr-20-07  Trimagna: DRAW
1. d4 d5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. e3 e6
4. c4 Be7
5. Nc3 O-O
6. Bd3 dxc4
7. Bxc4 c5
8. O-O a6
9. a4 Nc6
10. b3 cxd4
11. exd4 Nb4
12. Bb2 Nfd5
13. Qfd2 Bd6
14. Ne4 Bf4
15. Qe2 f5
16. Ng3 b6
17. Ba3 Bd6
18. Rfe1 Nf4
19. Qd2 Nbd5
20. Bbxd6 Qbxd6
21. Bbxd5 Nxd5
22. Qg5 Qf4
Sep-06-07  Petrosianic: <Many of the games of the Lasker-Janowski world championship match have a kind of hilarious sameness to them:>

True, but...

<Lasker plays some outrageous move (21...h5!?) designed to lure Janowski into launching an unsound attack against Lasker's king.>

...In this case, I don't think that is the case. I think that Janowski's 21. P-B5 was in fact a blunder, and Lasker's "outrageous" reply was actually the correct way of taking advantage of it.

How is White supposed to reply here? If 22. Qg3, then exf5 and Black's just gotten a pawn for nothing. If 22. Qf3 Nc3!. I bet that Janowski saw the Knight fork, but couldn't find anything better.

Mar-02-08  Knight13: < Queen Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)> This game actually transposed into one of the Queen's Gambit Acceptedlines.

<How is White supposed to reply here? If 22. Qg3, then exf5 and Black's just gotten a pawn for nothing. If 22. Qf3 Nc3!. I bet that Janowski saw the Knight fork, but couldn't find anything better.> I think your 22. Qg3 is better than taking the pawn and gettin' forked.

Sep-21-10  soothsayer8: cool game! Love the Lasker counter-attack.
Jan-29-11  Llawdogg: Janowski would attack, run out of gas, and then lose to Lasker. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Apr-18-14  Karpova: Janowski sealed his 32nd move and the game was adjourned after Dr. Lasker had played <31...Qe7>., but Janowski said that he would probably resign the game immediately and so the next game could begin. Indeed, he abdicated resumption of the game.

Source: Dr. Emanuel Lasker, 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.11.20, p. 10

Jun-07-17  RookFile: After 11....Nb4, 12. Ne5 is an interesting move.

Strangely, 12.....Nc6! is a good reply by black:


click for larger view

Nimzo wouldn't play it this way, but in this specific situation, white's best move may be 13. Nf3, giving black the option of ...Nb4 again if he wants to.

Against other moves:

A) 13. f4? invites 13......Qxd4+

B) 13. Nxc6 bxc6 14. Be3 Bb7 =

C) 13. Be3 Qc7 and white may have nothing better than 14. Nxc6 again, since 14. f4?! invites 14....Rd8 and black might even be slightly better.

This is the type of position where a guy like Reshevsky or Karpov would do well in. You might think after ...Nb4 from black that the knight would automatically go to d5 next move. But those guys would willfully forget the previous history of how the pieces got to where they were and examine each position on its merits. I think either of them might have answered 12. Ne5 with 12....Nc6.

Still white hasn't really lost anything after 12. Ne5 Nc6 13. Nf3 Nb4. Assuing he doesn't want a grandmaster draw, he just has to try something else. The point here is that a cagey white player might play 12. Ne5, hoping to have black burn several minutes off his clock - and then immediately answer 12......Nc6 with 13. Nf3

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Game 4, Lasker leads 2-0 (3-1)
from 1910 World Chess Championship (second one) by Penguincw
Emanuel Lasker's Best Games
by KingG
January, p. 3 [Game 4 / 2040]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
Janowsky punches himself out-Lasker wins #2
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
lasker best games
by brager


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC