chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Janowski vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), Berlin GER, rd 10, Dec-06
King Pawn Game: Maroczy Defense (B07)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 9 times; par: 117 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Janowski/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-17-05  who: Oddly, Janowski closes the open d-file instead of doubling his rooks on it, throwing away the advantage gained by Lasker's 2nd move, and giving Lasker a chance to double on the c-file.
Jan-07-07  Maatalkko: I think 3.Nf3 is superior to 3. dxe5
Mar-02-08  Knight13: <1 .d4 d6 2.e4 e5 3.dxe5 dxe5 4.Qxd8+ Kxd8> I bet no one ever does that these days. It's just weird...

And I agree with <who>'s comment.

Jun-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I agree with Maatalkko. I don't think that this ending gives White a meaningful advantage. And given that Janowski's strength was as a tactician, while Lasker was a great endgame player who liked to trade queens (remember St. Petersburg 1914, where he beat Capablanca with the Exchange Lopez with 5.d4, and played 5.Qe2 against Marshall's Petroff), 3.dxe5 is particularly poor choice for Janowski.
Jun-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <FSR> Lasker was better at everything than Janowski, except maybe mustaches, but certainly including tactics. He crushes Janowski in one middlegame after another in this match.
Jun-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Janowski was better at drawing wealthy patrons though.
Apr-07-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <Knight13: <1 .d4 d6 2.e4 e5 3.dxe5 dxe5 4.Qxd8+ Kxd8> I bet no one ever does that these days. It's just weird...>

Opening Explorer

Oct-24-13  Sem: According to Euwe Lasker played the opening quite carelessly and he was lost after Janowski's 10th move. But then his fighting instinct reared its head, the very quality that Euwe so admired in him.
Apr-17-14  mrbasso: That would be a stupid comment from Euwe. I don't see any problem for black.
Apr-18-14  Karpova: The game was adjourned after <31.Ra6>.

Source: Dr. Emanuel Lasker, 'Pester Lloyd', 1910.12.09, p. 6

<Sem>

Did Euwe really mean this game and not, perhaps, game 5 Lasker vs Janowski, 1910?

May-14-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: This particular opening sequence -- 1...d6 with the idea of transposing to the Philidor, Pirc, Old Indian, or Dutch -- has recently become quite popular. This, I presume, is what <Honza> meant by gently indicating Opening Explorer. The earlier comment by <Knight13> -- "It's just weird" -- is, well, just weird.

This opening has recently even been given a name -- The (British) Lion.

Dec-17-14  Ulhumbrus: In his book <Chess secrets I learned from the masters> Edward Lasker says something like this: <Emanuel Lasker had heard that Janowsky had been making derogatory remarks about him and wanted to show that he could play with Janowsky like a cat with a mouse...it did not take him very many moves to outplay Janowsky and win the game>

Instead of 5 Nf3 5 Bc4 occupies the a2-g8 diagonal with tempo and Be3 may follow

With 5 Nf3 and 6 Nc3 Janowsky brings his knights out before the bishops, as Chernev recommends in his book <Logical chess move by move>, perhaps one of the best books ever written.

There is just one little problem with this, however: The reason for bringing out the knights first appears to happen to apply here to the bishops instead of the knights!

According to Steinitz that reason is that < You know where you want to place your knights before you know where you want to place your bishops. Certainty is a better friend than doubt>

In the present case the opposite seems the case: White knows where he wants his bishops ( ie to take possession of the diagonals a2-g8 and g1-a7) before he knows where he wants to place his knights.

So the reverse holds and it is the bishops which White had better bring out first.

Apr-15-15  MindCtrol9: Lasker was comfortable playing anything.
Apr-15-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I can hardly believe the first few opening moves. What was Janowsky thinking? I know what Lasker was thinking, "Here's a game I'm not going to lose"!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
WC (1910) KP Game: Maroczy Defense (A41) 0-1 Q exchange move 4
from yP-K4 Games by fredthebear
WC (1910) KP Game: Maroczy Defense (A41) 0-1 Q exchange move 4
from Pick & Ch(l)oose Patch o' Berries fo Fredthebear by fredthebear
February, p. 29 [Game 19 / 2055]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Sorry, there are no games similar to this one in
by ughaibu
Game 10, Lasker wins 7-0 (8 1/2-1 1/2)
from 1910 World Chess Championship (second one) by Penguincw
Game 10
from Big Book of World Chess Championships (Schulz) by Qindarka
Lasker wins seventh vs three draws and zero wins by J
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC