chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs David Janowski
Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), Berlin GER, rd 1, Nov-08
Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 20 times; par: 26 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Lasker/Janowski games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: It seems that 19. ... Rd6 is a blunder, for White can then win material by force, as Lasker demonstrates.
Oct-21-06  RookFile: This game is ridiculous, you'd think an A player was black.
Dec-12-06  Ch3ckmate: Janowski was no match against Lasker in the WC in 1910
Sep-06-07  Petrosianic: Certainly one of the least auspicious starts to a World Championship challenge ever. 19... R-Q3 is unworthy of an IM much less a challenger. Time trouble is unlikely to have been the issue. It hearkens back to Tchigorin's famous blunder against Steinnitz:

Chigorin vs Steinitz, 1892

...but at least in Tchigorin's case, you know it was an aberration.

Feb-11-08  asiduodiego: 19. Rd6??. Horrible Blunder. At least, is instructive: NEVER, EVER FORGET THE BACK RANK.
Mar-02-08  Knight13: Just a rare oversight by Janowski, which probably just completely blew his confidence away in this match.
Dec-15-08  YoungEd: Tactically, of course, Rd6 was a blunder. But I think the idea behind it was pretty good. It looks as though Janowski was intending a rook-lift so that his quuen and rook could attack White's K-side. White would actually have a bit of trouble defending this, perhaps. Just needed a bit more preparation somehow...
Nov-18-14  Petrosianic: <It looks as though Janowski was intending a rook-lift so that his quuen and rook could attack White's K-side. White would actually have a bit of trouble defending this>

I see what you mean, but it doesn't look too serious to me. The problem is Black's Bishop is stuck in a purely defensive roll and can't really contribute to the attack. And White has his own White squared Bishop to defend.

It looks like most of the play would have revolved around Black's weak Queenside pawns. White seems better but Black might be able to hold. White's best plan before the blunder seems to be to double rooks on the c 4, with an eventual Bc4 to try to swap off the defender.

Feb-26-18  Serpentin: une defaite surement demoralisante sur la suite du match!!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 1, Lasker leads 1-0 (1-0)
from 1910 World Chess Championship (second one) by Penguincw
January, p. 2 [Game 1 / 2037
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
98_D34_Tarrasch Defense of QGD
by whiteshark
+8 -0 =3 vs. Janowski (World Match, Berlin, 1910)
from Match Lasker! by amadeus
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav by Zhbugnoimt
by fredthebear
Lasker wins first vs Janowski with back rank mate trap
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
WCC: Lasker-Janowski 1910
by WCC Editing Project
Trampa de Lasker en la octava fila
from Grandes juegos de grandes jugadores by jonico
17.Qa5 Pressure after structure explosion
from Treasure's Ark by Gottschalk
Masters blunder too!
by parmetd
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC