chessgames.com

David Janowski vs Jose Raul Capablanca
"The Left-Right Hook" (game of the day Feb-24-06)
New York 1916  ·  Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 81 [what's this?]

Annotations by Drazen Marovic.

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Capablanca/Janowski games
PGN: download | view Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

Java Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Chess Viewer Deluxe Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  who: <acirce> regarding Capa never playing this again see Spielmann vs Capablanca, 1928 and Lasker vs Capablanca, 1921.
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  khense: I would think that most grandmasters would consider going for the 1/2 point with white against Capablanca. In this opening it didn't look like black should get anything unless white gives it to him.
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: What appeals to me here is the shifting nature of Black's final attack: how he breaks through on the queenside to win material on the kingside; how to manuever around a blocked pawn structure; how rooks can be as effective on open ranks as on open files.
Feb-24-06   offramp: The Big Yerm - the Yerm-meister - doesn't say what the best response to 4...Bf5 is. The answer seems to be 6.c5, as played in Miles vs J M Bellon Lopez, 1980. Black should not then exchange queens, as Bellon did, but has to go back: 6...Qc7 7.Bf4 Qc8 8.h3.
Feb-24-06   jamesmaskell: Against Capablanca Id be lucky to leave the room with my dignity let alone half a point!
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: On the yermolinsky excerpt:
The answer to 4....Bf5 can already be found in Reinfeld's on Capablanca from 1942
Feb-24-06   EmperorAtahualpa: This game kind of reminds me of Capablanca vs K Treybal, 1929..

The pun for this GOTD is excellent! Very creative!

Feb-24-06   psmith: <Calli> The reference to Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1924 misses an important difference. In the current game the pawn is still on e2 and the knight is on f3. So after 4...Bf5 5. cxd5 exd5 6. Qb3 Bc8 White has the option of trying for a more active game with 7. Bf4 or 7. Bg5.
Feb-24-06   psmith: <offramp> The continuation in Miles vs J M Bellon Lopez, 1980 isn't particularly impressive. After 6. c5 Qxb3 7. axb3 Nfd7 seems pretty passive. Why not any other move?
Feb-24-06   zhentil: <offramp> Yes he does. 5. cxd5 refutes it. Read the above comments again.
Feb-24-06   madlydeeply: kasparov had those same isolated b pawns in his game against the civilized world.
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  dakgootje: Very nice game, but for me, as being no master, the isolated double pawns looked very bad. Expect its not only whether you have isolated and/or double pawns but more what you do with them, and that they can be quite good indeed if you use them the right way.
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Odd finish! White escapes the mate on the rank,only to be pinned on the file:

47Kg3 Ra3+ 48 Kh4 Rh2#.Even the extreme desperate 47 Re7+ Kg8 48 Rg7+ Kxg7 49 Bf6+ Kg6 50 Kg3 Ra3+ 51 Kh4 Rh2# again!

Feb-24-06   gauer: Who annotated the board notes here?
Feb-24-06   McCool: Maybe this guy.

Drazen Marovic

Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: The notes have the name of the annotator attached.
Feb-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  twinlark: Having just recently played through Dus Chotimirsky vs Capablanca, 1925, I'm struck by the similarity of the Queen Bishop orchestrating attacks on both wings from d7.
Mar-26-06   epiglottis5: Regarding 4...Bf5, see the website below. It has very informative analysis.

http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_t...

Mar-26-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  who: from the link provided by <epiglottis5>.

<A further point: Why do I know this? Even in 1977, well before computers and Chessbase, I knew exactly how bad my opponent’s move was – and the reason I knew was simple: I was the stronger player! I had done my opening analysis; I had studied books on the Slav Defense; I had read the footnotes as to why 4…Bf5 was bad, and I remembered them.>

So Yermolinsky is wrong about there being no opening theory on 4...Bf5.

Aug-08-06   Notagm: What if white had played 34. Rc1 (instead of Ra1), to keep black's bishop out of c2 and e4?
Aug-08-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Notagm> if 34.Rc1 then Rxf4+!
Feb-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <Notagm: What if white had played 34. Rc1 (instead of Ra1), to keep black's bishop out of c2 and e4?>

<Calli: <Notagm> if 34.Rc1 then Rxf4+!>

<Calli>'s post highlights a neat tactic, however, after 34. Rc1 Rxf4+, the game can continue 35. Nxf4 (35. Kxf4 Bg5+ leaves Black clearly better) Rxg1 36.Ne2, after which the position seems essentially equal, so 34. Rc1 would have been an improvement over the obvious 34. Ra1 (posting the Rook on an open file, but allowing the invasion of Black's LSB).

Feb-08-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Who>

<<A further point: Why do I know this? Even in 1977, well before computers and Chessbase, I knew exactly how bad my opponent’s move was – and the reason I knew was simple: I was the stronger player! I had done my opening analysis; I had studied books on the Slav Defense; I had read the footnotes as to why 4…Bf5 was bad, and I remembered them.

So Yermolinsky is wrong about there being no opening theory on 4...Bf5.>

But why is 4....Bf5 is in the footnotes? Because that is where they put the "don't play this" lines. Later on in your link:

<After Capa’s lucky escape, the writing appeared on the wall, in the game Johner-Nisson from 1920. There White played the correct 5.cxd5 cxd5 6.Qb3, and killed Black. (P F Johner vs A Nilsson, 1920)

Check out some statistics: I looked this line up on Chessbase.com. The first seven games played with this line (White playing correctly, starting with Johner-Nilsson) give us six White wins, and Black scored one measly draw.>

In short, 4....Bf5 is a thoroughly crappy move. That was Yermo's point.

<who: <acirce> regarding Capa never playing this again see Spielmann vs Capablanca, 1928 and Lasker vs Capablanca, 1921.>

In the Spielmann game, after 5. cxd5 Capablanca played the superior 5....Nxd5 instead of 5....exd5, and Spielmann failed to find Nd2 and e4. In the Lasker game, White had played e3, after which ...Bf5 is perfectly fine. In fact, Capa's own annotations point out that e3 makes ...Bf5 possible. Looks like he had learned his lesson.

Aug-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  birthtimes: Here's some of what Capa himself had to say about this game...

After 6. Qxb6, "cxd5 is better. The text move leaves Black with a perfectly safe game. In fact, I prefer Black's game after the [queen] exchange."

After 10...Bd7, "Black's plan consists in advancing the b6 pawn in due time and posting a knight at c4. White will then be compelled to take it off, and Black will retake with the b-pawn, undoubling his pawns and increasing the pressure against White's QR and b-pawn."

After 11. Be2, "Bb5 is better, since it would hinder Black's plan."

After 15...Na5, "This move was made stronger through White's previous move, which was weak."

After 18...Nc4, "Black's first plan is completed. White will now have to take the knight, and Black's only weakness, the doubled b-pawn, will become a source of great strength at c4. Now for two or three moves Black will devote his time to improving the general strategic position of his pieces before evolving a new plan, this time a plan of attack against White's position."

After 19. Bxc4, "White takes...probably for two reasons: first, he wants to play e4 immediately, and second, he thinks that the knight will probably be stronger in this position, which is somewhat blocked, to use the technical term."

After 22...b5, "Black has already established his position; there is no longer any danger and his pieces are all well posted. It is, therefore, time to evolve a plan of attack, which in this case will be to fix as many White pieces as possible on the queen's side by threatening b4, then somewhat to break up the king's side through g5, and then through the greater mobility of the rooks to occupy the open g-file. When this is accomplished, Black will then be threatening White's position through the king's side, and at the same time will always maintain the threat of b4."

After move 31...Rag8, "Black is now ready to reap the reward for his well-developed plan. All that is now needed to incline the balance in his favor is to bring the bishop at d7 to bear pressure against White's position."

"If 33. Bxb4 Bxb4 34. axb4 h5 threatening to advance the pawn, and Black should win."

After 34. Ra1, "This makes matters easy for Black. He should have played Rc8.

From "My Chess Career" by J.R. Capablanca, 1966, pp. 153-157.

Aug-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  birthtimes: "Let’s go back a couple of moves and think what Black would do in case of a little move transposition, 5.cxd5 cxd5 (5..Nxd5!? is what Black probably has to do, but White must be doing well after 6.Nd2, followed by e4)...There’s no modern theory after 4..Bf5?, because it’s a bad move and nobody would play it any more. Capa himself must have figured it out pretty quickly, as I don’t know of any other games of his played with this variation."

Looks like Yermolinsky didn't do his homework...

OK Alex, we'll let you off the hook this time...try Spielmann-Capablanca, Berlin, 1928. The first nine moves are as follows...

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 Bf5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. e3 e6 7. Bd3 Bb4 8. Qc2 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Qa5

Now, if 6. Nd2 Nf6 7. e4 I suspect Capa would play 7...Bg6. If 8. Qb3 Capa would probably play 8...Qb6 with Nbd7 and e6 to follow.

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing >

Secrets of Opening Surprises
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
back rank or side row mate-take your choice!
from unique themes three by kevin86
Capablanca!
by chocobonbon
Chapter 6 Schematic Thinking (full game)
from Shereshevsky's Endgame Strategy by hms123
34 ... Rg4xf4+! White g2-knight pinned to g1-rook, f3-king no d
from !! --: A square only appears multiply defended by notyetagm
Hvalros' favorite games
by Hvalros
Good Bs and Bad Bs
from chess strategems iii - under construction by gauer
34 Kf3xRf4 Be7-g5 skewers White f4-king to undef White b1-rook
from Skewers by notyetagm
World Champions
by clifton
A "little" strategic
from outplayer's favorite games by outplayer
in the grand manner
from the most instructive games of chess ever played by biohaz
pixing's favorite games
by pixing
getting a feel for the openings (D)
by fourier
Capablanca's Best Chess Endings (Irving Chernev)
by nightgaunts
annot
from LEARNING by gmlisowitz
34 ... Rg4xf4+! 35 Kf3xRf4 lines up with b1-rook for ... Be7-g5
from DECOYS: Squares lined up diagonally with rooks by notyetagm
schnyder's favorite games
by schnyder
Strategic Advantages
from Positional Chess Handbook II by monopole2313
34 .. Rg4xf4+! White g2-knight pinned to the undefended g1-rook
from Pins against undefended pieces by notyetagm
sekminga juoda slavu 4...Bf5
from kibitz games by eigis
34 ... Rg4xf4+! White f3-king cannot defend, makes skewer align
from King and queen are too valuable to defend by notyetagm
plus 33 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies