Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Friedrich Saemisch vs Jose Raul Capablanca
"Do You Know the Way to Beat José?" (game of the day Apr-29-2014)
Karlsbad (1929), Karlsbad CSR, rd 16, Aug-19
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Accelerated (E24)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 21 times; par: 124 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Saemisch/Capablanca game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-20-13  Mudphudder: I find it hard to believe that Capablance had blundered on the 9th move of the game LOL. 9...Ba6??? REALLY?!!!
Sep-20-13  RookFile: Not sure what difference it makes whether you blunder on move 9 or move 30. If you blunder, you blunder.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: A game famous for Capablanca's blunder in the opening and the salacious explanations for it. Was he distracted by his girlfriend's sudden appearance? His wife's? Saemisch's wife's? Vera Menchik's? We may never know for sure.

Saemisch never gets too excitied or impatient, adopting the Balance of Trade approach to exploiting his advantage There is one nice cheapo after <25...h4>:

click for larger view

<26.Nd4!> and the knight is immune due to 25...exd4 26.cxd4 trapping the queen. However, Capablanca had already used up his month's supply of blunder, so that possibility was too much to expect.

In short, anybody who planned to beat Capablanca by waiting for him to blunder a piece in the opening would lose on time a thousand times over before it happened again. Still, that was probably a legitimate strategy.

Apr-29-14  waustad: How to beat Jose? Use Fritz.
Apr-29-14  newzild: Capablanca pays the price for disobeying his own rule: "Every move - no matter how obvious - must be checked". He then goes on to put up a tremendous fight for another 50 moves. What a champ!
Apr-29-14  Aniara: Love the pun. With a dream in your heart you're never alone.
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Who was this impostor playing under the name of Capablanca?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: < perfidious: Kasparov in OMGP on Capablanca's blunder:

< '....The secret of this "blunder of the year" was revealed by the victim himself. It turns out that before Capa's ninth move a beautiful brunette appeared in the hall-his wife Gloria, who had turned up out of the blue from Havana. This "opening surprise" shocked the master: he was having an affair with a beautiful blonde....'>>

Is Carlsen partial or affected by beautiful blonds? If so, assuming he is "batting for our side", then something could be arranged by Anand or another rival!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <brankat: There is another memorable game which Capablanca lost as Black when playing Saemisch variation of Nimzo Indian:

Lilienthal vs Capablanca, 1935

A beautiful win by Lilienthal!>

Thanks for this - yes, a great game by Lillienthal. He was a great master in his day.

Apr-29-14  anjyplayer: Whats so great about this game ?
Apr-29-14  john barleycorn: <anjyplayer: Whats so great about this game ?>

That Saemisch did not lose on time.

Apr-29-14  gars: Great pun! As for games in this tournament I prefer Capa vs Mattison.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: Great pun, game not so much.
Apr-29-14  john barleycorn: no way, Jose.
Apr-29-14  solskytz: Why must I lose to this idiot?
Apr-29-14  psmith: <LIFE Master AJ>: It's Capablanca playing the magnificent defense after the horrible blunder, and lasting 60+ moves against Saemisch. Which perhaps makes things more understandable, but still gives credit to Saemisch.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: It looked like black's connectors would win, but they fell a step short.

A RARE Capa misjudgment.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Sad to see that these two played only twice- with one win each.
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: I loved the song and I loved living in San Jose in 2005. What a great time and too short. When I was a child the song came out and it brings back double memories of childhood and living in the city.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: A possible alternative explanation for why Capa was distracted:


Jun-06-14  wellsometimes: Tales are interesting, amusing. Strictly from the standpoint of learning, once Capa made his blunder, things change to how Saemisch should have technically managed to win the game. To stop, to slow, to unharm, somehow, the desperate Black's pawn storm on the kingside, seems to be fruitful. Why not to play, for instance, 23.h4? Commentators would have analyzed moves like that? Which are their downsides?
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I often get the impression that Capablanca was very uncomfortable with any opening that evolved after 1914.
Jun-23-16  edubueno: The presence of Gloria affected Capa's game.
Jun-05-18  Whitehat1963: Thursday puzzle after 26...Bd7.
Nov-24-18  mikealando: It would be kind to note that Saemisch owned the opening.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
"Every move - no matter how obvious - must be checked". -- Capa
from yMemo '17 to C Quad by fredthebear
Capa fights back after blundering a piece!
from 1920s Roar by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Karlsbad 1929
by JoseTigranTalFischer
The Games of J. R. Capablanca
by mariofrisini
by akatombo
from Anonymous Blunderers Club by TheAlchemist
Samisch plays his variation of the Nizmo-Indian.
from Namesake openings. by just a kid
chessfanprag's favorite games
by chessfanprag
Black SHOULD have resigned after 9...Ba6??; 10.Qa4! & 11.d5 +-
from Games that SHOULD have been "shorties" ... by LIFE Master AJ
Capablanca's profound opening play
from Funny games by Benjamin Lau
zumakal blunders archivadas3
by zumakal
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Accelerated
from marwanredman123's favorite games 3 by marwanredman123
Even Homer nods..capa's worst blunder.
from How to beat Capa by kostich in time

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC