chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Anatoly Karpov vs Garry Kasparov
Kasparov - Karpov World Championship Rematch (1986), London ENG / Leningrad URS, rd 19, Sep-24
Gruenfeld Defense: Russian. Prins Variation (D97)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 27 times; par: 65 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 192 more Karpov/Kasparov games
sac: 27.Bxg5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-22-08  bravado1: Everyone praises Karpov's endgame technique, but Kortchnoi was of a different mind. Karpov was labeled so very early in his career and now everone seeks only the games where Karpov's endgame superiority is shown. He, however, made also a lot of mistakes in endgames. It seems that Karpov's biggest asset was his great opening preparation combined with deep understanding of a given position. As to endgames, I think Smyslov was almost w/out a flaw. When it comes to squeezing points out of nearly better positions Botvinnik was considered the best. Anyway, that's what Kortchnoi, Unzicker and others say. I'm much below this level of chess, so I can't argue.
Jul-22-08  Everett: All the greatest chess players have great tactical awareness, positional understanding, cool-headedness and strong technique.

What I find makes Karpov unique (not necessarily better) is his ability to play into middlegame positions that seemed to respond to endgame principles. His best handling of the Caro-Kann fits this description, as does some of his Gruenfelds. Of course, he basically put aggressive prophylaxis on the map and based an entire style around it. Only when Kasparov was able to "speed up" the action, did Karpov at times (and only rarely) seem out of breath.

I agree <bravado1> with your Smyslov comment. If I could have the ability of one player in the endgame, it would be Smyslov, bar-none.

Jul-23-08  dwavechess: Rybka at 14 plies agrees 80% of the times with kasparov, Karpov less than 50%, but wins, very strange.
Jul-24-08  Everett: It seems that Karpov, at his best, is less understandable to chess computers (and maybe the rest of us), than most others.

The 20% Rybka didn't agree with from Kasparov is what to look at in this case. Kasparov's mistakes may have been graver than Karpov's, and Karpov's may have been only marginally off from the "best" moves.

Jul-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <dwavechess> You might run Rybka on some other games from that match.

The Gruenfeld was borderline even in 1986. Black has a narrow range of options, and if he messes up even a little, White has free game with many choices.

That could be why Rybka agrees more with Kasparov here. He has a bad game after an error, but plays the maximally tough moves after that.

Jul-25-08  tomfoolery: And additionally, computers just don't play the same chess humans do. Unless Rybka disagrees tactically, it's not always right.
Aug-25-08  dwavechess: "It seems that Karpov, at his best, is less understandable to chess computers (and maybe the rest of us), than most others." I think the same, not just for this game, of thousands of games I put rybka to analysis, karpov is perhaps the one that more times could defeat the oponent having far less agreement with rybka. Other players I saw a few times doing this were Kasparov, Tal, Aronian. Perhaps Karpov could be the most rybka-killer player ever.
Sep-09-08  dwavechess: Very interesting! perhaps expected, at
3 minutes per move with Rybka 3 w32 4cpu Karpov agrees 66%, much more.
Sep-11-08  dwavechess: Rybka 3 w32 agrees with Kasparov just 65% at 3 minutes per move, so R3 its a better tool.
Dec-26-08  morin: 14. Bb5 was an innovation on that time. It turns the game around white d pawn.

15. ... Rad8 or 15. ... Bd7 are better.

Mar-16-09  WhiteRook48: and kasparov goes berserk
May-31-09  Valiantangel: But whats the idea of 14.Nb5?...i find it hard to understand
May-31-09  WhiteRook48: Kasparov is tied up...
Jun-29-09  Knight13: <Valiantangel: But whats the idea of 14.Nb5?...i find it hard to understand> To control the d6 square. White needs that square for his passed pawn.
Aug-04-09  WhiteRook48: superb chess by Karpov!
Mar-14-10  Everett: From move 19-30, the great players are having a dance over the fate of the pieces on the d-file. Strangely omplex yet isolated play.
Mar-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: I would love to see the Karpov of 1981 play the Rybka of today! If I had 3 wishes, this would be the third one:)
Mar-15-10  Everett: Three chess wishes:

Lasker vs. Rubinstein in 1913 or 1914

The qualifiers run without the Botvinnik rule, allowing Stein and Bronstein to get in the mix in the 60's. Would have been great, great chess...

Fischer vs. Karpov in '75 (of course)

May-30-10  talisman: <Everett> that is one heck of a post...i agree
Mar-05-12  zakkzheng: a very crazy game
Jul-30-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  SpaceRunner: SpaceRunner: Almost perfection from Karpov...especially the endgame!

Kasparovs decisive mistake was
23... Bxd2 ?? and 26...g5 made it easy (for Karpov!).

The end is more likely to be:

41....a6 42. Be3 , Ne5 43. Kd4 , Nc6 44. Ke4 , Nb4

Dec-06-13  Robyn Hode: I doubt anyone would play the Na6 line anymore. Better is the Nc6/Nd7-b6 line.
Dec-06-13  Everett: < Robyn Hode: I doubt anyone would play the Na6 line anymore. Better is the Nc6/Nd7-b6 line.>

<Gelfand vs Topalov, 2013>

Black has 3 solid replies to have equal play by move 14. Line seems fine and healthy .

Jan-11-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Black plays 13...♘f6-e4. This knight provides the focus for the entire game. It will soon become pinned to a rook on e8.


click for larger view

Black sets his sights on f2; he gives up the exchange to reach this position, after 18...Qxb2:


click for larger view

Black attacks white's rook on e1 with 22...Bc3


click for larger view

Karpov responds with a threat of his own. He interposes his knight with 23.Nd2. This creates the threat of Nxe4 and if ...Bxe4 then f3 wins the pinned bishop.

But Kasparov tries to make use of the Rf1's complete lack of squares: 24...Bd7 has the simple threat of ...Bb5 winning back the exchange. The bishop on d7 also protects the rook on e8, so that ...Nxd2 is now a threat.


click for larger view

What can Karpov do? He plays 25.Bf4. After 25...Bb5 26.f3 Kasparov tries to disconcert his opponent with 26...g5.


click for larger view

He is shocked by the simple 27.Bxg5.
This is based on s very strange trick: If 27...Nxg5 then 28.Rxe8+ Bxe8 and now 29.h4! wins the knight!


click for larger view

Trapped!

A little later, after 34...Rxd5,


click for larger view

Karpov plays the superb 35.Rg5+! avoiding all future tricks. He then plays to reach the time control at move 40 and Kasparov resigns.

Feb-09-17  clement41: Superb play here, both tactically and strategically in this ...Na6 Grünfeld
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Is the Grunfeld Sound?
from Simply Karpov!!, Simply Superb!! by Open Defence
Game 18
from Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy (Watson) by howardb86
World Championship Rematch 1986 Rd.19
from Favorite Games from (1980-1999) by Jaredfchess
Karpov World Championship Games
by Penguincw
Game 19
from Modern Chess 3 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Decisive World Championship Games
by FaradayBach
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by alip
1986#5 Karpov beats the Grunfeld and ties the match
from Notable Chessgames of the 1980's by Jaredfchess
senakash's favorite games garry
by senakash
Gruenfeld Def. Russian. Prins Var (D97)1-0 IQP allowed activity
from yFredthebear's Pawn Trimmers and Mowers by fredthebear
Special K's...the games of Kasparov and Karpov
by bobbyboomer
Isolated Queen's Pawn
from Positional Motifs by Del ToRo
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by sdbehrendt
IQP Wins.
by WiseWizard
Gruenfeld Def. Russian. Prins Var (D97)1-0 IQP allowed activity
from Karpov-Kasparov & Kasparov-Karpov by fredthebear
Karpov does the hat trick to gain a tie in this match
from Kasparov-Karpov-the rematch 1986 by kevin86
Gruenfeld Games
by Zhbugnoimt
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by Psihadal
Grunfeld Defense
by leobabauta
Karpov crushes Kasparov's Grunfeld
from Great WCC games by positionalgenius
plus 53 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC