chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Anatoly Karpov vs Garry Kasparov
Kasparov - Karpov World Championship Match (1987), Seville ESP, rd 9, Nov-04
Gruenfeld Defense: Exchange. Seville Variation (D87)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 192 more Karpov/Kasparov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-15-05  weepingwarrior: The Spassky Variation found it's way back to Karpov's Opening against Kasparov, who dubbed this " The Seville Variation" "Thanks Kasparov, for not only disrespecting Spassky, but also for being so self centered. At least Korchnoi is still active. Your retired!
Apr-27-06  thom: 57. ♕b7+ not ♕c7+
Apr-27-06  blingice: Yes, that does seem wrong.
Apr-27-06  scriabin369: Is 26. e5 ... possibly followed by 27. Ne6 ... 28. Qc1 ...

The plan being that Karpov may have to sac his pawn... though it may not actually be taken... gaining at least an attack on the out of position king

Sep-09-07  nelech: instead of 26 Nd5? 26 Nd3!was winning : 26 ...Nb6 27 Qd2 Kg7 25 Qb2+ Kg8 29 Qb3+ Kh8 30 Rf7
Oct-20-08  Brown: <nelech> Great find! Did you happen to look at 26..Qa3, because I think after the exchange of queens, white will put a rook on f7 with some pressure, but perhaps not enough to win. A long endgame will ensue, with white maybe a pawn up.
Jun-28-09  WhiteRook48: practically the entire match was contested after 14 Kxf1
Jun-30-09  Knight13: <practically the entire match was contested after 14 Kxf1> Until it became a drawn rook endgame on move 62.
Jun-25-13  csmath: Here Kasparov employed new approach with 14. ... cxd4 not happy with the way 5th and 7th game went even though he himself now thinks that 14. ... Qd6 was actually better.

But the real stinker here is the move they did not analize in his camp 21. ... e5?! in his typical active approach to defence.

This could have cost him the game. Kasparov himself has no comment for 24. ... Qd6 even though he had another (perhaps better) option 24. ... Qe7.

By the way on 26. Nd3! as suggested black is not forced to play 26. ... Nb6. Even if so 26. ... Nb6 27. Qd2+ Kg8 29.Qb3+ black does not have to play 29. ... Kh8? but rather 29. ... Nc4 which is what Kasparov suggested in his book on "Modern Chess - Part 3."

Nevertheless because of exposed kind black position is very difficult to hold and perhaps it is strategically lost but there was a possibility. Black would be forced to give a pawn and the best he could hope for is to enter rooks ending that way. Whether that would have been enough to win it is hard to say.

Karpov was surely relentless in those types of situations.

Aug-10-13  csmath: <The Spassky Variation found it's way back to Karpov's Opening against Kasparov, who dubbed this " The Seville Variation" "Thanks Kasparov, for not only disrespecting Spassky, but also for being so self centered. At least Korchnoi is still active. Your retired!>

I did not notice this originally but ...
I think it is really unwarranted comment, excuse me. Spassky did not invent "Spassky" variation either, it has been played by Tolush and Gligoric before Spassky and surely all of the richness of the variation has been expanded to these days.

Most of the times the variation names are given because of certain important events. In this case Sevilla match for WC was one of the greatest WC matches in the history of chess and thus this variation is rightly so christened with the proper name.

Dec-05-13  jrofrano: <csmath> Please provide a game where Bxf7 was played before Karpov played it in this world championship. I was unable to find anything other than some game between two guys I've never heard of Michaelsen and Wegner.
Dec-05-13  RedShield: See Spassky vs Korchnoi, 1955.

In <Kasparov vs Karpov 1986-1987>, Garry notes in Game 5:

<The capture on f7 surprised me, of course. All of us Soviet players grew up on <Kurs Debyutov> by Panov and Estrin, where in black on white it was written that 13.Bxf7+ (after the exchange of pawns on d4) 'does not give any advantage', and 'Black's position fully compensates for the sacrificed pawn'. The same verdict was given by Botvinnik and Estrin in their monograph on the Grunfeld Defence (1979) and by Karpov himself in the Yugoslav <Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings> (1976).>

Dec-13-13  jrofrano: <RedShield> I found that game a few days ago as well. Thanks for the information!
Aug-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: From what I remember, Karpov's score with the 12.Bxf7+ Seville variation is pretty bad.
Aug-18-15  Nerwal: <From what I remember, Karpov's score with the 12.Bxf7+ Seville variation is pretty bad.>

Well, games 5 and 11 of the Seville match were decided by terrible blunders. Karpov's best game in this line is probably the Belfort one (Karpov vs Kasparov, 1988).

Aug-18-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Nerwal: <From what I remember, Karpov's score with the 12.Bxf7+ Seville variation is pretty bad.> Well, games 5 and 11 of the Seville match were decided by terrible blunders. Karpov's best game in this line is probably the Belfort one (Karpov vs Kasparov, 1988).>

So what was Karpov's score with the Bxf7+ Grunfeld?

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Gruenfeld Def: Exchange. Seville Var B sacs (D87) 0-1 Qs jig
from Cats of the Gruenfelds by fredthebear
Grunfeld Exchange, 7.Bc4
by KingG
Gruenfeld Def: Exchange. Seville Var B sacs (D87) 0-1 Qs jig
from Attacks & Sacs on f7 Fredthebear ECO codes A-D-E by fredthebear
9th match game 14 ... cxd4
from Grunfeld 1st collection by Justs99171
Karpov Draws
by Penguincw
Karpov up a point,but it's a rook pawn
from tie goes to the runner/one for the road by kevin86
Game 36
from Modern Chess 3 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
1987, Game 9
from Karpov - Kasparov WCC Draws by Penguincw
Game 9, Match tied 4 1/2-4 1/2
from WCC 1987 [Kasparov-Karpov] by foxmt
no rompin
from 96b_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 2 by whiteshark
Grunfeld Defense
from TO_STUDY by gis74
9th match game 14 ... cxd4
from Grunfeld 1st collection by SantGG


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC