|Sep-27-05|| ||BishopBerkeley: This appears to be the first game in our database, perhaps the first game in history, in which a sitting World Chess Champion plays Chess against a computer!|
Though Robert James Fischer had played against a computer earlier
Fischer vs Greenblatt (Computer), 1977
I don't think that anyone other than himself (and maybe Greenblatt (Computer) ) regarded him as the present World Champion.
(: ♗ Bishop Berkeley ♗ :)
Bishop Berkeley's Cyber-friendly Chess Page
|Sep-27-05|| ||fgh: Nice attack :-)|
|Sep-27-05|| ||Happypuppet: These were still the days when humans beat the snot out of computers... but that's gone now. :(|
|Sep-27-05|| ||korger: <These were still the days when humans beat the snot out of computers...>|
Pardon me, but this game hardly qualifies as "beating the snot out of a comp." It was Karpov who made mistake after mistake in this game (which is very unusual of him, I wonder if he was drunk or something). At move 32, the computer stood distinctively better, and was well on its way to win the game (like 32... ♕b8 33. ♘e7+ ♔h7 34. ♗e4+ f5 35. ♕xb8 ♖fxb8 36. gxf5 ♗f7 etc.) Instead, it must have blown a circuit, or what else could have caused the colossal blunder 32... Rfd8?? In any case, impressive performance from that early computer, but the finale should have been much better.
|Sep-27-05|| ||THE pawn: Rfd8 leads to the same damn conclusion Korger: checkmate, the other way is simply longer. And I don't think Karpov played badly at all, he knew his opponent was weak and played immediately for a charge on the king.|
|Sep-27-05|| ||SnoopDogg: I agree with <korger> somewhat because just flipping through the game at 30 secs a move I am really confused on how the computer did not find Qa2 (trade material when up material) and Qb8 (the move korger suggested).|
To me, I'm surprised that Karpov didn't play on the queenside with doubling on the queenside then b5 since he had more space, a knight, open a-file and a bishop pointed in that direction. Especially since he tried to attack a kingside where black could respond in the center.
I think Karpov commented on this game, does anyone know where?
|Nov-05-07|| ||m0nkee1: This is a very impressive performance for a 1978 Computer... FYI is the Novag Super Sytem 3 - could be bought in the shops. |
- Snoop Dogg
I agree - 29 Qa2 should win the game??
But Computers don't always see simplifying moves unless they come with a material gain tho. Shame - I think Karpov was playing fool hardy and this early Computer almost thrashed him.. shame it didn't see QE2 or it might have been a big upset.
|Nov-05-07|| ||jackpawn: I know it was a different computer and apparently Karpov wasn't taking this game seriously, but I can't help but contrast this game with Fischer's computer games in 1977. Fischer crushed what was probably a stronger computer.|
|Nov-05-07|| ||RookFile: It would have really been something had this toy computer taken it's better position and converted it to a win.|
|Nov-05-07|| ||whatthefat: I can only assume this was played at a short time control.|
|Feb-16-09|| ||Goldengab: This was a forced draw by repetition, the only way to stop Black clear advantage in this game. Instead of fxg6 leading to draw SS III played the blunder move!|
|Feb-24-09|| ||WhiteRook48: computers were dumb in 1978|
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC