Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Viktor Korchnoi vs Anatoly Karpov
Karpov - Korchnoi World Championship Match (1978), City of Baguio PHI, rd 7, Aug-01
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Bishop Attack (E47)  ·  1/2-1/2


explore this opening
find similar games 120 more Korchnoi/Karpov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-01-04  Helloween: Has anyone ever looked at the continuation 39...Bxf2! 40.Rf1 Qb6 41.Ne4(Qf4) Nxe4 42.Qf4+ Nf6 43.Rxf2 Qd4, retaining winning chances for Black?
Jun-01-04  WMD: Ray Keene: "We started analysing the adjourned position [after 41...Kf8; Korchnoi had sealed 42.Qh8+] in a state of deep depression but it gradually became clear that Korchnoi could fight on. The key defensive resource was found by Murei, appropriately enough on his thirty-eighth birthday. When we finally abandoned analysis at 7 a.m. we had still not solved the position. We had found neither a clear win for Karpov nor a clear draw for Korchnoi. To our astonishment Karpov came to the board next day and offered a draw, which was of course accepted. As the players were seen signing the score sheets most of the spectators assumed Korchnoi had resigned and pandemonium broke loose when it was announced the game was drawn. "They'll never believe me in Argentina," lamented Najdorf.

"Asian Junior Champion, Murray Chandler, articulated the question in everyone's mind for New Zealand radio: "Why was Karpov so sure that Korchnoi had found the crucial saving continuation? Why did he not even probe to find out jus how much Korchnoi knew? Personally I think Karpov was just plain gutless. He could have played on and forced Korchnoi to prove he had found a saving variation. Karpov would not have risked anything."" (Karpov-Korchnoi 1978)

Jun-01-04  WMD: It's interesting that in his book From Baguio to Merano (co-authored with Baturinsky), Karpov does not directly address the finale of game 7, but instead has this to say:

"The seventh game was played in an atmosphere of extreme tension. When in a Nimzo-Indian Defence my opponent with White employed a relatively new continuation, after 20 minutes' thought I realized that it would be extremely dangerous to remain passive. It was amusing that, while I was thinking, Korchnoi literally ran off the stage, demonstating to those present that extraneous forces were acting on him - that hypnosis again. I sacrificed a pawn, and then the exchange, and my opponent could not keep running off to the rest room: White's position, although it looked sound, demanded careful consideration at the board. For the first time in many games between us we both ran short of time, and we both made mistakes, the last one, as later transpired in analysis, being made by me. And although it was terribly vexing to have to reject playing for a win, and to agree to a draw, this seventh game nevertheless showed me that my opponent felt ill at ease in sharp, unclear positions. And another thing: he had become less good at defending. An important conclusion! Formerly he had been a different player, more resourceful, whereas he now had a clear leaning toward technical positions. And the eighth game of the match confirmed the correctness of this conclusion."

Mar-17-05  mcgee: Black is still probably winning regardless of whether he plays 39..Bxf2 or not. 40...Nxe4 is the one that virtually throws the win away, I think. I think that Karpov's analysis of Korchnoi should really be reversed -he plays awfully in this game when he is the exchange up and needs to play boring technical chess. At the eleventh hour, he successfully manages to muck up the position when Karpov is in time trouble and swindle a draw. Indeed, I like Larsen's annotation where he gives 40 Ne4 two exclamation marks in parentheses and says, ' A good try.'
Jul-07-06  who: What are the other options?

Larsen gives 40...c2, but Fritz points out that 41.Nxf6 Qxf6 42.Qxh7+ Kf8 (42...Qg7 43.Re7+ ) 43.Qh6+ Qg7 (43...Kg8 44.Rxd3 ) 44.Qf4+ Qf7 is a draw as well.

Jul-07-06  who: Larsen has another mistake in the annotation of the game. In his analysis of the final position.

He gives 42...Kf7 43.Qh7+ Kf6 44.Qh4+Ke5 45.Qg3+! as drawing, but actually 45.f3! actually wins for white.

Apr-09-08  Knight13: White should've went 14. bxa6. The resulting position after exchange sacrifice is not fun.

I wonder if 36...Re7 followed by ...Rd7 is better since then Black can prevent ...Qh6 with ...Kg7. I'd be fine with trading rooks after exd4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This is the final position, after 42.♕h7-h8+.

click for larger view

Black has two possible moves: 42...Kf7 & 42...Ke7.
In either case white checks with his queen again. If black wants to avoid the checks he has to go at some point to d7, for example: 42. Qh8+ Kf7

<(42... Ke7 43. Qg7+ Ke8 44. Qg8+ Kd7 45. Rxd3+ is the same)>

43. Qh7+ Ke8 44. Qg8+ Ke7 45. Qg7+ Ke8 46. Qg8+ and the only escape route is by 46...Kd7

click for larger view

But this allows 47. Rxd3+, grabbing a crucial passed pawn with check. 47...Kc8 48. Rxd8+ Bxd8 and this is the position on the board:

click for larger view

♕,♖ ♙♙♙♙♙ v ♕♗♘♙♙♙.

That whole line is not too hard to see. That was why the adjourned position was agreed a draw.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I like this position, after 15...axb5:

click for larger view


click for larger view

Kortschnoi played 32.b4. Keene says that this was en error, giving Black a passed pawn for no reason.

Towards the time control things start to look bad for White.

click for larger view

He plays a last, very clever bid for salvation, based on Qh6 followed by Ne4!, which deflects the ♘f6 from the defence of the h-pawn. *****
Does anyone know why Karpov played

click for larger view

28...Kh8? It seems a bit early in the game to be a time-trouble move.

Jan-07-17  Howard: Karpov no doubt would have won this game if he'd had White. Once he was the exchange up, he'd just play in his dry, technical style and just patiently wrap up the win.

The comments by Keene and Chandler, by the way, appeared in Chess Life & Review. In my opinion, they were typical of the biased coverage that Keene and Stean gave of this match, not to mention the Korchnoi-Spassky match in late 1977.

Sep-17-17  Howard: Just looked at the December, 1978 issue of CL&R earlier today. The issue doesn't mention any forced wins for Karpov, though I do recall reading a couple times in other sources that Karpov missed excellent winning chances just before the adjournment.

Perhaps Stean and Keene (Korchnoi's seconds) didn't want to admit that Karpov probably should have won. Their coverage of this match was blatantly biased--no question about it. For example, regarding the adjournment, they remark that Korchnoi was upset during the game by the presence of that "hypnotist" in the audience who was trying to rattle Korchnoi. Now, was his presence really anything to be concerned about?

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
15... axb5
from The Exchange Sacrifice: A Practical Guide by Jaredfchess
Match Korchnoi! (i) The Early Years (1956-1984)
by amadeus
1978, Game 7
from Karpov World Championship Games by Penguincw
Nimzo Indian
by Zhbugnoimt
by rodrigochaves
World Championship Game #7
from Run for the Championship - Viktor Korchnoi by Fischer of Men
Korchnoi get outplayed with extra exchange, then he saves
from Immortal draw games by Darth Lasker
Game 7, Match tied (0-0) 3 1/2-3 1/2
from 1978 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Game 7
from WCC Index [Karpov-Korchnoi 1978] by nescio
15... axb5
from The Exchange Sacrifice: A Practical Guide by QueensideCastler

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC