chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Anatoly Karpov vs Vladimir Kramnik
Linares (1994), Linares ESP, rd 11, Mar-11
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran. Reynolds' Variation (D48)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 15 times; par: 57 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 42 more Karpov/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-27-06  you vs yourself: <18.Be3 "This unassuming little move is Karpov's earth-shattering invention...>

I don't understand why this move is being praised so much. It seems logical to develop the only minor piece on the back rank so that the two rooks are connected. The bishop has 3 sqaures it can go to; one will lose. So, of the two possible squares for bishop, it seems logical to move the bishop to a square where it attacks the centralized knight. What's so earth-shattering about that? What am I missing here?

Mar-27-06  notyetagm: <you vs yourself> This game is dissected in the newest volume, V, of Kasparov's My Great Predessors.

I do not remember all of the details of the excellent analysis but the main point was that no one prior to Karpov thought that this move 18 ♗e3! promised White anything at all. Karpov saw that it could give him a small advantage. Kramnik, a Semi-Slav expert, was then confronted with a new position over the board and was totally outplayed by Karpov.

This game probably decided the tournament. Because of the lot drawing, players had to play Kasparov and then Karpov in succession. Kramnik had just beaten Kasparov's KID when in the next round he lost this game to Karpov.

Sep-29-06  positionalgenius: Karpov's best victory at linares,amd his best win ever vs kramnik.
Oct-04-06  colles: <WMD: "Karpov has beaten me in Linares - 94, in that tournament he scored 11 of 13. I was making normal moves but I do not understand why there appears a lost position. Even after the game I could not understand anything> That reminds me of a statement made by Spassky to whom asked who was the strongest player he ever met: "It was not Fischer. It was Karpov: he was the only player that gave me feeling of not understanding what was going on the chessboard".
Oct-04-06  cotdt: How exactly is this won for Karpov? I know Kramnik's flag fell, and later he admitted that he was lost anyway. But I've played through the final position with an engine and it seems like black can save the game. Black's knight maneuvers can take the h4 pawn, and white can't make progress on the kingside. meanwhile, black can trade off the queenside pawns. the remaining position looks drawn.

40...Rb4
41. Rc8 Kh7 42. Kg3 Ne6 43. Kg4 g6 44. Rc6 a5 45. b3 Nd4 46. Rc7+ Kh8 47. Nxa5 Nf5+ 48. Kf3 Rb5 49. Nc6 Rxb3+ 50. Kf4 Nxh4 1/2-1/2

Oct-05-06  positionalgenius: <cotdt>You trust a chess engine over two of the greatest chessplayers ever?:) Schiller gives ...<Kf7 is met by Nd6.The endgame is lost>In standard chess openings.
Oct-05-06  cotdt: <positionalgenius>I trust what I can understand, and these GM's didn't explain why White is winning. Also, GM's are poor endgame players in general. I'm not saying this to be arrogant, I'm just stating a well-known belief in correspondence chess circles.

Why Kf7 when you can move Rb4? Fine then let's take 40...Kf7 41. Nd6+ Kg8 (forced)
42. Ra8 (or h5, which changes little) Rxb2+
43. Kg3 (or Kf3 doesn't matter) g6
44. Rxa6 (or Ne4, which also draws) Rb3+
45. Kg4 Rb4+ 46. Kh3 Rb3+
47. Kg2 Rb4 48. Ne8 Rxh4 Draw

Oct-05-06  positionalgenius: <cotdt>is this a serious post?? "GMs are poor endgame players in general" Um,if they were they wouldn't be grandmasters.If Kramnik says he's lost trust me he's lost.And karpov and Kramnik are two of the greatest endgame players of all time.
Oct-05-06  cotdt: From Page 1, Danny King annotated:
"40...Rb4! is better: 41 Rc8 Kf7!. The kingside pawn majority could yet prove its worth, but while White's knight is tied to the defence of the b-pawn - and while the rook is tied to defending the knight, for that matter - I think the game is more likely to end as a draw."

So even a GM thinks it's a draw! so why did Karpov claim it was a win? he's supposed to have a deep understanding of chess, but his games show mainly just good opening preparation. Can someone with a 6-man tablebase do the calculations to the very end? Might take a long time but it'll be worth it.

Oct-05-06  cotdt: <positionalgenius> really? I've seen very many games where Kramnik, Karpov, and Kasparov screwed up the endgame. Even a specialist at endgames like Korchnoi screws up a lot of endgames. in kramnik's case, it's just about every single game he played so far in this WCC match. only tablebases can be trusted in the endgame. computer engines are weak in the endgame too, but with human guidance they are much stronger.
Oct-05-06  positionalgenius: <cotdt>my gosh-Danny king??? He's the master of the endgame,so lets believe him before two great world champions!!!!! Pardon me!!!!
Oct-05-06  positionalgenius: Everyone is human,nobody is a tablebase.
Oct-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <cotdt> After 40...Rb4 white can play also 41.Re4 and if 41...Rb3, then 42.Re3 (instead of Re8 with repetition) 42...Rb4 43.b3. I cannot say that this is won by force for white but in practice it would be very difficult to play it with black against player like Karpov. Also after 40...Kf7 41.Re3 Rb4 42.b3 white has a solid chance to win.
Oct-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <Also after 40...Kf7 41.Re3 Rb4 42.b3 white has a solid chance to win.> Well, here 42...Kg6 with threat Kh5 would be quite annoying. So 40...Kf7 41.Re3 Rb4 42.Rf3+ Ke7 (or Ke8 or Kg8) 43.b3 looks better.
Oct-05-06  positionalgenius: <Honza cervenka>Thanks for the winning lines.
Oct-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <Thanks for the winning lines.> I don't think that they are winning. They keep the game alive but due to very reduced material black has objectively fine chance to save it. Especially if he eliminates white b-Pawn his task would be quite easy. He can sac the Knight for both Ks Pawns with theoretical draw in K+R vs K+R+N endgame.
Oct-05-06  positionalgenius: <honca cervenka>Two super-GMs (and world champs)agree that its a win for white.Why is everybody saying draw?
Oct-05-06  Everett: <karpov and Kramnik are two of the greatest endgame players of all time.>

Karpov yes, but not flawless. Kramnik, good, but not considered one of the greatest.

<positionalgenius> The clear winning line is a long way off, but the advantage is still with white. Karpov would have to prove it, and it won't be easy. So the position is not a foreseeable win, at least not yet.

Nov-02-06  Sularus: <lostemperor: you have to learn to draw before you can paint>

harharhar! very funny!

Nov-05-06  pilobolus: To chessgames.
Somehow the Slovak chess player
Ftacnik name is copied to
event and site field.
Feb-28-07  micartouse: The comments on 18. Be3! by GM King seem very odd to me: "How many night's slaving over a hot chessboard had it taken for Anatoly to discover this possibility? We can only marvel at the alchemy that changes a position previously thought to be equal into one where White has ... a miniscule advantage."

With all respect to King, I think he's way off the mark here. I bet Karpov spotted the possibility almost instantly when trying to improve theoretically equal endgame lines. The move is natural and therefore an obvious candidate for exploration. Maybe he took a few minutes to work it out and convince himself it had potential, but I hardly picture him slaving away like some demented scientist. But who knows?

Feb-28-07  Brown: <micartouse> I took King's commentary to be snide, with the "..." pause, mocking Karpov, either for the work Karpov may have put into it, or for the "miniscule advantage" the novelty produces.
May-31-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Daniel ♔'s annotations are pretty cool.
Aug-15-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: Absolutely. I have always liked them, although they tend to be a tad sensationalist.
Aug-16-08  M.D. Wilson: <colles: <WMD: "Karpov has beaten me in Linares - 94, in that tournament he scored 11 of 13. I was making normal moves but I do not understand why there appears a lost position. Even after the game I could not understand anything> That reminds me of a statement made by Spassky to whom asked who was the strongest player he ever met: "It was not Fischer. It was Karpov: he was the only player that gave me feeling of not understanding what was going on the chessboard".>

Interesting. Yes, Spassky did say Karpov was the toughest player he ever faced in his many years against the best.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
275
from Anatoly Karpov - My Best 300 Games by webbing1947
The Champion at Linares - 1994
from Simply Karpov!!, Simply Superb!! by Open Defence
103
from OMGP V by keypusher
Karpov's Games from Linares 1994!
by danielpi
Linares ESP 1994 Rd.11
from Favorite Games from (1980-1999) by Jaredfchess
masterizando el juego final
by kastillov
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav by Zhbugnoimt
by fredthebear
Slavosch
from Mrcomputer55's favorite games by Mrcomputer55
41_R+N - TActical TAngos
by whiteshark
Game 42, QGD, Semi-Slav
from Anatoly Karpov's Best Games by nakul1964
Karpov's Strategic Wins, volume 2
by ssp
Karpov at his peak torments young Kramnik. [Meran Ng5]
from Kar pov 12th World Chess Champion by fredthebear
100 best of the best Chess Games
by tallike
Power Chess - Karpov
by Anatoly21
Anatoli Karpov tied Vladimir Kramnik 2 to 2, with 9 draws
from Karpov vs. the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Game 103
from On My Great Predecessors 5 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
moreorlesschess' favorite games
by moreorlesschess
Karpov's Strategic Wins, volume 2
by Incremental
Round Eleven, Game #73
from Linares 1994 by suenteus po 147
Game 41
from Move by Move - Karpov (Collins) by Qindarka
plus 40 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC