Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Beliavsky vs Garry Kasparov
Moscow (1981), Moscow URS, rd 1, Apr-04
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Yates Defense (E83)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 47 times; par: 53 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 29 more Beliavsky/Kasparov games
sac: 15...Rb8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-15-05  aw1988: 39...e2 40. Qd2 with a painful end for black.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <lopium: Why not 39...e2 ?> That would win a bishop for the e-pawn, but Black is aiming to maneuver the knight to d3 and win a whole rook for it.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <aw1988: 39...e2 40. Qd2 with a painful end for black.>

That would allow 40...exf1(Q)+ 41. Rxf1 Qxf1#. White probably has to play 40. Bxe2 instead, and Black's ahead, but not by as much as in the game.

Feb-15-05  aw1988: Did I really suggest Qd2???
Feb-15-05  eyalbd: <Benjamin Lau> According to a commentator in the Israeli Chess Federation Magazine from that time, Kasparov sank into a one hour thought before playing 13..b5!

So it is probably a sac to eliminate the weakness at b6. If there was an error, it's probably a move earlier (12...Nxc6 insdead of 12...bxc6)

Feb-15-05  aw1988: Benjamin Lau is no longer a regular member here, sadly. He will not see your message.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: The finish might be 41. Rb1 hxg2+ 42. Bxg2 e2 43. h3 Bd5 44. Qxf2 Nxf2+ 45. Kg1 Nd1! and Black queens.
Mar-14-05  lopium: If 39...e2. Then Qd2 as you said. But instead of eXf1, eXd1. So e pawn eat the tower and become a queen. Then 41.Qxd1. And black has one piece more than white. Isn't it?
Mar-14-05  Saruman: <lopium>, <beatgiant> have already demonstrated the mating line as I hope you observe, whereas it is completly forced. I suggest that you should give it another try.
Mar-15-05  lopium: <saruman>, beatgiant had demonstrated the mating line from the final position, yes. But not if 39...e2 39...e2 wins too. Maybe longer than Kasparov did, but wins.
Jul-12-05  Jafar219: 13...b5!.Kasparov pondered over this move for 68 minutes.It is his record.
Jul-12-05  AdrianP: It has been clarified here: Yusupov vs Kasparov, 1989 that, contrary to <Ben Lau's> post above Kasparov deliberately sacked the exchange.

There may exist examples of Kasparov losing rather than sacrificing exchanges, but neither this game nor Yusupov vs Kasparov, 1989 is one of them.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Jafar219: 13...b5!.Kasparov pondered over this move for 68 minutes.It is his record.> What is his record?
Jul-16-06  KingG: <What is his record?> Maybe record length of time spent on a move.

Out of interest, does anyone know of a someone spending longer than 68 minutes on one move in top class chess?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: In the game L Steiner vs Bogoljubov, 1928, Bogolyubov supposedly spent two huors on his 24th move, coming up with a lemon that lost a piece.
Dec-22-07  SuperPatzer77: White has the only move after 40...Ng4: 41. Rb1 below:

41...hxg2+, 42. Bxg2 e2, 43. Qg1 Qf4! (threatening Nf2+), 44. Bc6 Nf2+, 45. Kg2 Bh3#

After 43...Qf4!, 44. Rf1 exf1=Q, 45. Bxf1 Nf2+! 46. Kg2 Bh3#

After 45...Nf2+!, White has to give up the White Queen for the dangerous Black Knight with 46. Qxf2 Qxf2

So, 43. Qg1 leads to the overloading. So, White has a better try of 43. h3 instead of 43. Qg1.

Dec-22-07  SuperPatzer77: Addition to my analysis <SuperPatzer77> - 43...Qf4!:

43...Qf4! (threatening Nf2+), 44. Bf3!? (only move) Qxf3+, 45. Qg2 Nf2+!, 46. Kg1 Qxg2+, 47. Kxg2 Nd1! -> Black e-pawn goes queening .

Nov-24-08  aazqua: The exchange sacs seem almost like a bluff. The other player accepts, then plays some passive moves to try to consolidate only to be overwhelmed by Kasparov's superior piece activity. White's play after achieving the material advantage is down right insipid.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: I have done a youtube analysis of this game using Fritz, check out the following link if you are intersted - thanks!

Apr-24-10  Ulhumbrus: One justification for playing 26 f4 with the bishop still on e3 is that with White's Queen's Bishop on e3 the N on d4 is then attacked twice. Black can't respond with ....e4, as that displaces the e5 pawn which defends the N a second time, and leaves the N on d4 defended only once.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Deliberate sac or creative blunder!!?
Jan-04-11  SuperPatzer77: We overlooked 41...Bd5!! if White's reply is 41. Rc1 or Rb1.

41. Rc1/Rb1 Bd5!!, 42. Qxf2 (forced) exf2, 43. Rd1 Be4, 44. Rc1 Ne3! (forcing the inevitable mate)


Mar-20-11  janovisk: The best is 40...e2!! The most fine!!
Nov-24-11  Helios727: What happens after 20. Bxd4 exd4 21. Qxd4 ?


click for larger view

Does black still have enough compensation for the exchange?

Nov-24-11  King Death: <Helios> After your suggestion, I think Kasparov would have played 21...Nd5 with the idea 22.Qd2 Rb2, a standard idea from the Benko Gambit.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
King's Indian Defense
by SpiritedReposte
Chess Informant Best Games 2
by Olanovich
kasparov best games
by brager
A fine line between brilliancy and blunder
from Thunderstorms from a Blue Sky by Benjamin Lau
1. d4/c4.. and 1..........c5 games
by S T Sahasrabudhe
Secrets of Modern Chess
by Friedeggsof
Game 12
from Garry Kasparov's Greatest Chess Games (Stohl) by AdrianP
from Garry KASPAROV on Garry KASPAROV I 1973-1985 by beta
Chess Informant Best Games 2
by koinonia
Power Chess - Kasparov
by Anatoly21
Game collection: KID
by Cannon Fodder
King's Indian
by KingG
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by niazidarwish
KID Saemisch
by ISeth
Kasparov The Killer!!
by chezstartz
King's Indian
by ALL
The Very Best Games Of Garry Kasparov
by depamas
Game 158
from Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy (Watson) by isfsam
Game 158
from Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy (Watson) by Qindarka
Nikki KID
by reurbz
plus 16 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC