chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian
"The Bogus Indian" (game of the day Feb-10-2017)
Bugojno 3rd (1982), Bugojno BIH, rd 6, May-??
Bogo-Indian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation (E11)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 75 times; par: 33 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [11522 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Kasparov/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-27-12  DWINS: I've been reviewing this game with Houdini and it seems that Garry's note to Black's 20th move contains a mistake in analysis.

< There is nothing else, since it is no longer possible to buy off the opponent with a pawn sacrifice: 20...f6 21.Nc4 Bd7 22.Nxb6 axb6 23.Qxb6 Bc6 24.Bb5! Bxb5 25.Qxb5 with a straightforward win.>

However, instead of an exclamation point, 24.Bb5 deserves a question mark. Black would respond with 24...Qb4! forcing White to grab a perpetual by 25.Rxc6 bxc6 26.Qxc6 Rac8 27.Qa6 Ra8 28.Qc6 Rac8. All other continuations leave Black with an advantage.

For what it's worth, Houdini feels that 24.b4 Rxa2 25.b5 Rb2 26.Qe3 Rxb5 27.Bxb5 Bxb5 (0.76) is the best continuation.

Aug-15-12  Bezlitosci: Once i started analyzing this game with a computer, I was impressed by the number of possibilities white has in this game. Kasparov exaggerates a bit by giving exclamation marks to his moves that engine lists only as the third or fourth best move (however, all this moves are similar in evaluation).

Black's decisive mistake was 12...♕e7. After 13.♘fe5 black has nothing better than to take the knight - if he f.ex. plays 13...♖d8 than after 14.♘xc6 bc6 15.♕a5 white threatens ♘e5 with triple attack on the undefended at the moment c6 pawn, and black cannot defend this pawn. So 13...♘xe5 14.♘xe5 and as Kasparov pointed out, white has already dominating position, because all the squares controlled by white pieces restrict black's pieces movements possibilities very much.

Kasparov writes that 16.♕a5 prevents 16...f6 in view of 17.♘c4 ♘xc4 18.♖xc4 with a decisive invasion. However, black's position is so bad, that white doesn't really need to prevent f6 and can even play move like 16.a3 or 16.b3. After for example 16.b3 f6 17.♘c4 ♘xc4 18.♖xc4


click for larger view

black still cannot activate any of his pieces and white can slowly realize his advantage - for example 18...♖b8 19.♕c2 ♖d8 20.♖xd8 ♕xd8 21.♖c7 and white will eventually win the material by provoking weaknesses in black's position, while black can't really do anything.

After 19...♖e8
It's hard to give Kasparov's 20.♖dd1 exclamation mark, since there are other options, that put slightly more pressure. Possible was 20.♖dc3 with a threat of ♖c7 and 20.♖b3 threatinig ♖xb6. White could also play 20.♕b5 threating ♖c7

After 21...♔g7 Kasparov consistently realize his plan of advancing pawns on the queenside. However, at this moment there also were other options: white could play 22.♕c3 with the threat of discovered check and 22.♘g4 with the threat of ♕c3. If 22.♕c3 f6 then 23.♕c7 ♕xc7 24.♖xc7+ The difference between playing ♕c3 at 22th move and earlier is that earlier after ...f6 ♕c7 ♕xc7. ♖xc7 white wouldn't gave check, so he would lost the knight. After 21...♔g7 white could also double his rooks on the c -file with the intention of ♖c7.

Aug-15-12  Bezlitosci: Very interesting situation occurs after 18...♘b6.


click for larger view

Black threatens 19...f6 20.♘c4 ♘xc4 21.♖xc4 b6.


click for larger view

Now white cannot play ♕c3 maintaining pressure because of Ga6 and if 22.♕b5 than the whole continuation allows black to free from a pressure to some extent. White has after 18...♘b6 other (and probably better) than 19.♗f1 ways to met possible ...f6.

1) 19.♖dc3 with a threat ♖c7. ...f6 surely doesn't help now in the view of ♖c7

2) 19.♘g4 with the threat of ♕e5, after which white would have threats ♘f6, ♘h6 and ♖c7. If now 19...f6, then 20.e5 f5 21. ♘f6+ or 20.e5 exf5 21.♘xe5 and black weakened his pawns significantly. Black has to do something with white's threats, but f.ex. 19...f5 20.♘e5 fxe4 21.♗xe4 with position similar as in the variation above, or 19...h5 20.♘e5 and black cannot play f6 now, because the g6 pawn would be undefended.

3) 19.♖b3 f6 20.♘xg6 hxg6 21.♖xb6


click for larger view

4) 19.♗h3 The purpose of this move is that after 19...f6 20.♘c4 ♘xc4 21.♖xc4 b6 22.♕c3 ♗a6 23.♖c7 ♕xc7 24.♕xc7 ♗xd3 white can play 25.♗xe6+,


click for larger view

moreover, after 25...♔h8 26.♗f7 ♗xe4 27.♕e7 black has nothing better than to give a rook for a bishop. If 27...♔g7 than 28.♗d5 with check and simultaneous attack on black bishop.

Oct-06-12  Tigranny: Why did Kasparov always have the white pieces against Petrosian and never played black when the two played? Just curious.
Jul-26-15  Chessman1504: An important game by "The Dark One." Kasparov, known for his brilliant attacks, also had remarkable patience. I regret my preconceived notions and stereotypes of his play. He was an all-around genius.
Mar-20-16  posoo: I HEREBY NOMMANATE dis game for game of da day. I suggest da pun "NUT PUNNISHER."
Nov-12-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Gary learned how to get a good grip on things.
Nov-14-16  gareeb: Euthanized in Bugojno ..!!
Feb-10-17  Crapablanca: Why not 24. . . .Qe8 25. Ng4 Qf8
Feb-10-17  Nerwal: <Why not 24. . . .Qe8 25. Ng4 Qf8>

26. ♘f6+ and 27. ♕e5.

Feb-10-17  TransfiniteCardinal: Just joined this <intimidatingly intelligent> site, I've been lurking here for years.
Feb-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <TransfiniteCardinal>, welcome aboard!
Feb-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: I was just getting started in chess back when this was played...it made quite an impression on me, because I hadn't seen Petrosian smothered like this, apart from Fischer vs Petrosian, 1971.

Really, I didn't understand the game at all, and I've lost quite a few times to strong positional players by getting my queenside paralyzed as Petrosian did here. Looks like there has been some good kibitzing on this page, I'll have to work through it.

Feb-10-17  MelvinDoucet: DWINS wrote: <"There is nothing else, since it is no longer possible to buy off the opponent with a pawn sacrifice: 20...f6 21.♘c4 ♗d7 22.♘xb6 axb6 23.♕xb6 ♗c6 24.♗b5! ♗xb5 25.♕xb5 with a straightforward win."

However, instead of an exclamation point, 24.♗b5 deserves a question mark. Black would respond with 24...♕b4! forcing White to grab a perpetual by 25.♖xc6 bxc6 26.♕xc6 ♖ac8 27.♕a6 ♖a8 28.♕c6 ♖ac8. All other continuations leave Black with an advantage.>

Someone beat me to it.. by 5 years! :) Kasparov was quick to give his own moves exclams, it seems, but in his defense ♕b4 is an easy move to miss especially when you're not running the game through an engine.

Feb-10-17  sachman19: why Bogus Indian?
Feb-10-17  morfishine: <sachman19: why Bogus Indian?> Because its another irrelevant game-title that serves only one purpose: leave people perplexed, shaking their heads

more accurate: Bogus game title

*****

Feb-10-17  WorstPlayerEver: Pun is not nice to Bogoljubow, but hey... rats will be rats.
Mar-27-17  FredGambit: Quick note: In an otherwise fine book (Chess: The Art of Logical Thinking), GM Neil McDonald placed this game in a chapter called "Strategy Under The Microscope: 1 d4 d5"

Now, McDonald could blast me off the board in his sleep, but I'm pretty sure the Bogo-Indian isn't a 1 d4 d5 opening. But don't let that scare you off, it's quite a good book.

Mar-27-17  Nerwal: <Now, McDonald could blast me off the board in his sleep, but I'm pretty sure the Bogo-Indian isn't a 1 d4 d5 opening.>

There are many transpositions possible in the Catalan and Bogo-indian (like here 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. ♘f3 ♘f6 4. g3 ♗b4+ 5. ♗d2 ♗xd2+ 6. ♕xd2 0-0 7. ♗g2 ♕e7). The most important feature is that the pawn eventually stands at d5 and give later one of the typical Open Catalan structures (g3 fianchetto, black pawn at e6, c and d pawns exchanged).

Feb-17-18  tgyuid: put the donkey on e4, Sir
Feb-17-18  tgyuid: just put the donkey on e4, Sir
Feb-17-18  tgyuid: you should have put the donkey on e4, Sir
Feb-17-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  iking: <tgyuid: put the donkey on e4, Sir> ... the donkey wont help .. the rook on d8 is hanging after the queen exchange.
Feb-18-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: I'm sorry, but I every time I see a Bogo-Indian with 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 4.Bd2 I think about this game: L Palau vs S Kalabar, 1927.
Feb-21-18  Petrosianic: Kasparov's notes make no mention of it at all, but it looks like where Black starts to go wrong is with 12...Qe7. In such a wide open position, Black can't afford to lose even a single tempo.

Black needed to play something like an immediate Rd8, followed by Bd7 to mobilize the Queenside. It's important to play Rd8 with gain of time first, though, as if a White knight goes to e5, Black will probably want to play Be8 without shutting in his rook. After all that, the game is still relatively equal.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
crecs' favorite games
by crecs
His absolute favorites: GK's Golden Chess Stock
by SirChrislov
grincho13's favorite games
by grincho13
Notes
by Moonstardust
Open files
by vkastanas
Nimzowitsch Variation. 24a
from Bogo-Indian by PinkLedDoor
Kasparov
from Champions miniature champions by addison13
Round Six, Game #41
from Bugojno 1982 by suenteus po 147
Catalan
by Adoryn
Game 16
from Logical Thinking (McDonald) by Incremental
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by niazidarwish
Kasparov The Killer!!
by chezstartz
This game showed the brilliance of Kasparov
from Battle Chess ~ Chess Masters on Winning by Reinf by fredthebear
Game 18
from Garry Kasparov's Greatest Chess Games (Stohl) by AdrianP
Game 41
from Instructive Chess Miniatures (Ataman) / Qindarka by fredthebear
Bugojno, 1982
from Favorite Games from (1980-1999) by wanabe2000
Petrosian vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Book of Samurai's favorite games
by Book of Samurai


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC