|Oct-12-05|| ||notyetagm: 32 ... ♘d1+!, <discovered interference>, winning the exchange.|
|Oct-12-05|| ||notyetagm: <A discovered attack is like making two moves at once.> This is the reason for the lethality of discoveries. When Kasparov played the discovered interference 32 ... ♘d1+!, it was like he played 32 ... ♖a8-c8 and 32 ... ♘b2-d1+ <simultaneously>.|
It's like Garry waved a magic wand and said "For my 32nd move I will now make two moves in a row. For the first part of my move, I will play 32 ... ♖a8-c8, moving my rook to an open line and making the White c1-knight loose. And for the second part of my move, I will play 32 ... ♘b2-d1+, exploiting by interference the looseness that was created in the first part of my move".
|Dec-04-05|| ||TopaLove: The move I most liked in this game was 40 ... ♖c2+. It made possible for Black to promote his pawn first than White cause of the threat ♖b2+. Nice endgame!|
|Jan-16-06|| ||crepo: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 O-O 6. Be3 e5 7. d5 c6 8. Bd3 b5
9. cxb5 cxd5 10. exd5 e4 11. fxe4 and now where are the compensation for black ?! please someone help me|
|Jun-23-07|| ||notyetagm: It's like Garry waved a magic wand and said
<"For my 32nd move I will now make two moves in a row. For the first part of my move, I will play 32 ... Ra8-c8, moving my rook to an open line and making the White c1-knight loose. And for the second part of my move, I will play 32 ... Nb2-d1+, exploiting by interference the looseness that was created in the first part of my move">.
|Jun-23-07|| ||sanyas: You said that already.|
|Jun-23-07|| ||notyetagm: <sanyas: You said that already.>|
I know. But I was reading Stohl's book last night and saw that tactical idea again and was going to do the writeup that I forgot I had already done. So that repeat was just a little note to myself. You do not often see the <DISCOVERED INTERFERENCE> tactic.
|Jun-26-07|| ||sanyas: Also note that if 33.♔e2 then 33...♖xc1 defends the knight|
|Apr-27-08|| ||compuserve: Hey Garry,whats your move if 11.fxe4?
Anybody? tnx much...
|Apr-28-08|| ||KarAkter: You are right.11.fe4! is much better.11... Ng4 12.Qd2 and now Bc3,Ne3 or f5(from my own database).Anyway,white rules|
|Apr-28-08|| ||KarAkter: But 11.Ne4 is also ok|
|Apr-29-08|| ||compuserve: Thnx much Karakter...|
|Feb-13-12|| ||screwdriver: I'd have liked to see the game played out further.|
|Nov-09-13|| ||Swedish Logician: The black variation, with 8. _ b5 was introduced by Timman in his game with Spassky, IBM 1973. Spassy refused the pawn sac. The seond sacrifice 10. _ e4 Timman gave already in his comments to the game Timman-Balashov, Sochi 1973, published in Learn from the Grandmasters (ed. Keene), Batsford 1975.
It is ironic that a decade and half later he should come to lose playing white against that very sacrifice ...|
|Sep-02-18|| ||An Englishman: Good Evening: If you wonder why not 11.fxe4, the game N Sabbag vs C de Holanda, 1992 might show why it's quite risky OTB.|
|Sep-02-18|| ||cunctatorg: Why not 32. Nxb3 (or even 32. ab) instead of 32. Rxb3 which permits the lethal 32. Nd1+! ?|
|Sep-02-18|| ||wordfunph: <cunctatorg>
1) -2.70 (22 ply) 32.Rxb3 Nd1+ 33.Rxd1 Rxd1 34.Nd3 Rd2+ 35.Ke3 Rxa2 36.g3 Re8+ 37.Kd4 g5
2) -3.78 (21 ply) 32.Nxb3 Nxb1 33.Rxb1 Rc2+ 34.Kg3 Rxa2 35.h4 g5 36.hxg5 hxg5
|Sep-02-18|| ||belgradegambit: Lately "puns" have been unimaginative or low quality. I wonder if they are still looking at user submissions or just making them up.|
|Sep-02-18|| ||RookFile: I think you should start by being thankful this website is even still around.|
|Sep-02-18|| ||belgradegambit: I am quite thankful for Sargon and others getting the site running again.|
|Sep-02-18|| ||Ron: After 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 O-O 6. Be3 e5 7. d5 c6 8. Bd3, 8. .... b5 is the move made by Stockfish 9.|
However, instead of 9. cxb5, Stockfish 9's choice is Nge2