chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Nigel Short
Chess Olympiad (1988), Thessaloniki GRE, rd 6, Nov-19
Queen's Gambit Declined: Charousek (Petrosian) Variation (D31)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 33 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 91 more Kasparov/Short games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-13-05  KingG: Short gets completely smashed in this game. Probably all his problems stem from the risky 9...c5!?, allowing White to stop Black from castling with the simple 10.Bh6!. After that, White just piles on the pressure down the e-file against the stranded king.

In the final position, Bxg5 is coming, and then it is all over.

Dec-13-05  hayton3: Yes - nice find. Kasparov just exploits the non-consolidated space behind Short's premature pawn advances.
Oct-26-11  SimonWebbsTiger: 10. Bh6 was a theoretical novelty; previously, 10. Bb5 had been seen (in Petrosian-Beliavsky, USSR 1982).

In GK's opinion (Informator - ref. 46/518), Short's error came at move 13. He suggested in his annotations <13...Nc6 14.Bg2 Bf8 15. 0-0 Bh6 16. Qh6 Qb6 17. Rad1 (17. Qg7 Ke7) 0-0-0 18. Rd2 > whilst <19...f6 > was more stubborn.

Oct-27-11  DrMAL: In this game Short used Charousek variation (3...Be7) that has several subvariations. 5.Bf4 started Alatortsev (5.Bf4 c6 6.e3 Bf5) which often prompts 7.g4! Be6 (or 7...Bg6 not as good) for strong and sharp attack as in recent Nakamura vs Aronian, 2011 (ignore silly criticism of 7.g4! there), this is main reason why 6...Bd6 often gets better results. Kasparov chose 6.Qc2 which can transpose to Alatortsev as it did, this was interesting alternative then. 6...Bd6 is most popular but results have been unimpressive and opening is still not played much, maybe 6...Nf6 is more promising. 6...g6 was interesting then but now considered quite poor and not really played at high level any more. Spassky originally tried it and lost Korchnoi vs Spassky, 1968 but maybe best example is famous Karpov loss Topalov vs Karpov, 1998.

9...c5 attempt at sharpness makes matters for black worse (10.Bh6! is obvious reason), best was simply to castle. Game is not good example of opening play, miniature is included because it shows excellent example of Kasparov attacking technique. On move 10 white has other options here is deep computer eval.

Houdini_20_x64: 32/78 31:03:42 1,177,070,553,482
+0.44 10.Bh6 Nc6 11.Bb5 cxd4 12.exd4 Bf8 13.Nge2
+0.36 10.Bb5+ Bd7 11.Bh6 Bxb5 12.Nxb5 cxd4 13.Ne2
+0.29 10.g4 Be6 11.Bh6 cxd4 12.exd4 a6 13.Bd3
+0.23 10.dxc5 0-0 11.Nge2 Bxc5 12.Nd4 Bd7 13.Bg5
+0.23 10.Nge2 0-0 11.dxc5 Bxc5 12.Nd4 Bd7 13.Bg5

Position here was worth deep computation, I was interested in how move order affects lines, such as idea of 10.g4 intermediate move since it had not been played earlier. It also keeps with old saying: see good move look for better one. Bb5+ was also interesting idea on move 10 or 11 but Kasparov wanted B on g2, allowing 11...a6 to prevent it. His technique here can be summarized as "sharp and most direct" avoiding anything fancy.

Computer offers 12.Qe3 as best to pin B and centralize Q for pressure on e-file where 12...Be6 is also likely response. However, this is less sharp than 12.g4! so it is no surprise what Kasparov chose. Computer also gives long castle as transposition (12.g4 Be3 13.0-0-0 Nc6) but Kasparov was more interested in sharpness and tempo. Likewise, intermediate move 12.h4 Nc6 13.g4 was avoided, consistent with "sharp and most direct."

This immediately paid off, after 13.Nge2 to get N into attack Short chose 13...Nbd7?! instead of 13...Nc6 perhaps this was aimed at Bf8 with N to recapture then move away for castle. 13...Bf8 was also good, after B swap black K can go to g7. It seems Kasparov was almost clairvoyant about not playing Bb5 earlier 14.Bg2! was now excellent position for B. 14.Nf4! is also clearly strong but bishop on e6 is not going anywhere and Kasparov practices another key principle in his technique "don't rush!" 14...Nb6 clarified intention of 13...Nd7 to maneuver Nc4 but this requires three tempos, and worse 15.b3! puts N in bad position on b6 anyway, with no future and away from battle.

This shows another key principle to Kasparov technique "get opponent pieces away from battle" that often appears as some sort of magic in his games. After 15...Rc8 (strong) 16.0-0 Rc6 to try and create some sort of counterplay 17.h3! reinforcing g4 underlines black complete inability to do so (computer gives 17.a4! showing white dominance all over board). Here 17...Bf8 seems clearly best (earlier too) but again Short chooses slower 17...Nfd7 for some sort of maneuver. Kasparov took advantage with more important manuever Nd1-Nf2 readying N for attack.

Short again avoided 18...Bf8 I guess his otherwise pointless 18...Rg8 was aimed at going g5 as he shortly did. But 19...f5?! was again rather dubious, part of plan for K-side counterattack. Black pieces are not poised for this and 20.Rae1! to ready last piece, being consistent and ignoring was strong reply. Now 20...g5?! was probably decisive but 21...Bf7? instead of 21...Bxf5 insured white victory after 22.Ng4! black is in virtual zugzwang here. With 22...Bh5? desperation move 23.Ng3! made hopelessness even more obvious, resignation was clearly best.

Oct-27-11  DrMAL: <SWT> Thanx for Informator notes I did not see your post before making mine. Yes 13...Nbd7 was error as noted. But in Kasparov line 16...Qb6 looks dubious, more solid looking 16...Qe7 or 16...Qd6 evaluates strongest by computer as one might suspect, game is nearly equal then. After 16...Qb6?! much stronger is 17.Qg7! forcing 17...Ke7 and then 18.Rad1 has clear advantage. I think Kasparov did not pay as much attention here, he would almost certainly have played 17.Qg7! OTB, cheers.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Queen's Gambit Declined
by KingG
senakash's favorite games qgd
by senakash
Kasparov The Killer!!
by chezstartz
158
from Middlegame Strategy by Patca63
Kasparov's miniatures
by shsmusic
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by KingG
158
from Middlegame Strategy by jakaiden
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by niazidarwish
Nigel Short ( 28 - 4 ) Thessaloniki
from 3. Garry Kasparov [69-9-1] by IsmaelElzara
158
from Middlegame Strategy by Sudgon
working on 3
by wwm
158
from Middlegame Strategy by Del ToRo
QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav #2
by Zhbugnoimt
Statonc's opens
by Statonc
Yardbird's favorite games
by Yardbird
Garry Kasparov's Best Games
by mangala
exploiting the pin!!!!!!!!
from jsteward's favorite games by jsteward
Kasparov The Killer!!
by Zhbugnoimt


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC