|Jul-21-05|| ||EmperorAtahualpa: Excellent game by Konstantinopolski!
|Oct-09-05|| ||BaiKosta: Great game in byzantine style!|
|Oct-09-05|| ||dakgootje: yes very nice game indeed|
|Mar-18-06|| ||ltsiros: Also to note is the Bishop manouver Ba6-d3-e4, attacking the target at g2.|
|Dec-10-07|| ||refutor: great game by konstantinopolsky
i thought the ...Ne4 followed by ...f5, ...g5 and ...f4 was great, especially against an opponent of the strength of keres.
|Jan-14-08|| ||vintage geisha: Can anyone explain what happens if black played 15)...Nxc5?? Can't black win the pawn safely, meeting 16)Nxe5 with 16)...Qxe5? Sorry if this is really simple- I don't have a chess computer at the moment|
|Feb-19-09|| ||ALwoodpusher: <vintage geisha> 15...Nxc5?! would allow white to post a bishop to d6, i.e. 15...Nxc5 16.Be3-Ne4 17.NxN dxe4 18.Bc5 |
|Feb-19-12|| ||The Curious Emblem: I don't like 8. c5. That move does not help White with his Queenside attack, as Black can prepre an ... e5 breakthrough in the center and nullify it. White had no concrete plan from there on in the game except to play defensively. A better move would be 8. Bg5, if White is willing to accept an Isolated Queen Pawn, which is perfectly fine here.|
|Feb-21-12|| ||Dr. Siggy: |
click for larger view
"This position which ocurred after White's 40th move is a study in the utilization of passed pawns. Black has won the Queen for Rook and Bishop, but White's QBPs are difficult to stop and it is only by using his own pawns in conjunction with mating threats that Black can win the game. The play is very delicate."
(William Winter, "Chess for Match Players", Bath 1951, page 277.)
|Dec-11-16|| ||Chizoad: I'm trying to learn to play against the Caro-Kann, and I don't understand 7.a3 in this game. 10 years later, Keres played another game that had the same position on board, but via transposition. Again, he had to play defensively and lost thanks to Tal's incessant pressure.|
Keres vs Tal, 1957
It's probably not good to lose two instructive games from the same position.
It seems to me the more active plan is to limit Black's ability to attack white's d4 pawn, which cannot be defended by a pawn. For a plan along those lines, look at Botvinnik vs Konstantinopolsky, 1943 in which Botvinnik trades off the dark squared bishops, then the knights, leaving black with the bad bishop versus his good knight.
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC