Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Tal vs Paul Keres
Tallinn (1973), Tallinn URS, rd 12, Mar-08
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Modern Steinitz Defense (C72)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 29 more Tal/Keres games
sac: 43.Qh5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-30-03  Shadout Mapes: What if 19...gxf6?
Sep-30-03  Cyphelium: Shadout Mapes> 19.- gxf6 20. Qxh6 with the threat of Re3-g3. Black seems to be lost, e.g. 20.- exd4 (20.- Ne7? 21. Re3 Qe6 22. d5) 21. cxd4 Ne7 22. Re3 Qe6 23. Rg3+ Ng6 24. h5 and white crashes through.
Sep-30-03  drukenknight: what if 44...Qg5?
Sep-30-03  ughaibu: Mate in 2.
Sep-30-03  drukenknight: oh I forgot about the pawn, crap. HOw did he manage to lose the exchange?
Sep-30-03  ughaibu: See Cyphelium's last note.
Mar-29-06  whatthefat: This is a really interesting tactical battle, with Tal showing devastating vision. As <tamar> showed on the Mikhail Tal page, the climax to the battle is set off by Tal's 16.Nd5.

This move - and Keres' reply 16...Qxf3 - give a unique insight into the minds of the two players. To play his 16th move, Tal has to see the follow up 19.Nf6+ and must furthermore judge the position after black's 20th to be better for white.

So the question is, what did Keres see when he decided to accept the sacrifice? Did he overlook the strength of 19.Nf6+? Or alternatively did he still consider himself to be better after his 20th move? In either case, it's an intriguing point.

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <whatthefat>I first saw this game in a small booklet covering Talinn 1973. Somehow I lost it, and am trying to piece together Tal's amazing run on chessgames.

Keres had a considerable plus score on Tal up to their meeting, and may have even hoped to win after declining the 19 Nf6+

33 years later Shredder thinks it is a draw after 19...gxf6 20 Qxh6 exd4 21 Kh1 Ne5 22 Rg1+ Bg4 23 Rg3 Qf1+ 24 Rg1 Qh3

Mar-29-06  whatthefat: <tamar: 33 years later Shredder thinks it is a draw after 19...gxf6 20 Qxh6 exd4 21 Kh1 Ne5 22 Rg1+ Bg4 23 Rg3 Qf1+ 24 Rg1 Qh3>

Very interesting. I suppose white could try to continue with 23.Rxg4+ Nxg4 24.Bxg4 Qxg4 25.Rg1. What does Shredder think of the position?

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <whatthefat> It sees no winning chances for White after Black gives up his queen with 25...Qxg1+ 26 Kxg1
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <tamar & whatthefat>

Fritz 9's evaluation after 19...gxf6, shows this line leads to a clear draw (.00) (19 ply).

Per Fritz 9, 19...gxf6, is also clearly Black's best move. 19...Kh8 is rated as (.73) (18 ply).

After 19...gxf6, Fritz 9's evaluation shows there are no reasonable alternatives to: 20.Qxh6 exd4 21.Kh1 Ne5 22.Rg1+ Bg4 23.cxd4 Nf3 (if 23.Rg3 Qf1+ =) 24.Rg2 Rxe4 25.Bb3 f5 (if 25...Ne1 26.Qg6+ =) 26.Qg6+ and the game will be a draw.

In his book, "The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal", Tal indicates that 19...Kh8 was a mistake. He then stated that White gradually realized his advantage of the exchange.

Regarding 19...gxf6, Tal provided this varation and short statement: "19...gxf6 20.Qxh6 exd4 21.Kh1 Ne5 with a very sharp game".

Now with the aid of computer programs, we can verify this sharp variation leads to a clear draw.

Mar-30-06  Hesam7: <tamar: Keres had a considerable plus score on Tal up to their meeting,>

All the "exact calculators" had a positive score against Tal: Keres, Korchnoi and Polugaevsky.

Mar-30-06  whatthefat: <Hesam7>
Spassky should probably be added to that list as well. I'd question the inclusion of Polugaevsky though - didn't he admit to tactical shortcomings?
Apr-01-06  Hesam7: <whatthefat> Polugaevsky has a very good score against Tal (+8 -2 =15, according to this database) better than Keres for example.

The point I was trying to make is that all the mentioned players were famous for calculating variations accurately and all of them have good positive scores against Tal.

Spassky is a universal player and his positive score against Tal is not as good as the above GMs.

Apr-02-06  whatthefat: <Hesam7>
I'm aware that Tal on the whole struggled against Polugaevsky. But what I'm not as sure about is this: <The point I was trying to make is that all the mentioned players were famous for calculating variations accurately>

In <The Mammoth Book of the World's Greatest Chess Games> by Burgess, Nunn and Emms, Polugaevsky is described like so: "His great strengths as a player were his strategic understanding and deep opening preparation, while his Achilles' Heel was his tactical vision, which let him down in some crucial games."

Maybe I've misunderstood your idea of an "exact calculator", but I would have thought that a tactical weakness would preclude one from being classified as such. By contrast, Keres, Korchnoi and Spassky were of course all exceptional tacticians.

Apr-19-06  Hesam7: <whathefat> Sorry for the late reply. I did not know about the quote by Burgess, Nunn and Emms. I always thought that nerves where Polugaevsky's main problems not his chess abilities. I think Polugaevsky was a good tactician, you can look up the chapter "Logic or Intuition?" in "School of Chess Excellence, Tactical Play".
Apr-19-06  whatthefat: <Hesam7>
Okay, thanks for that. I'm guessing he made a few tactical blunders in high publicity games, thereby gaining a bad reputation; when in fact he was a good tactician the majority of the time. To be honest I haven't deeply studied more than a handful of games by Polugaevsky, so it's difficult for me to judge.
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <Hesam7,whatthefat> Exact calculators did well against Tal, I'd agree, but add they had to be very hard workers as well.

Polugaevsky for example had a minus score (-1) until 1969, and had never beaten Tal. But his personality was to study very deeply, and play only variations he understood so well, he could compensate for his less speed of calculation with certainty about his position.

Tal was more of a gambler, and would play unfamiliar positions feeling secure in his over the board skill.

By the way, Tal at Talinn has my vote as the most inspiring tournament performance of all time.

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: It's hard to imagine someone having success with some of the sharpest variations of the Najdorf (including the Polugaevsky variation) without being good at tactics.
Apr-20-06  Akavall: Polugaevsky was perhaps the best at analyzing adjourned games, and it didn't matter whether the position was complex or simple.
Apr-26-09  WhiteRook48: who Keres?
Jun-12-15  ToTheDeath: TWO sacs on f6 including an Alekhine's Block with Rf6! The finish is attractive.
Jun-12-15  RookFile: Tal plowed right over Keres in this game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Instructive tactics, how to pry open the kingside with three pieces. I love the position after 42. R-h6. Black has a pawn attacking both black Rooks, and can't take either one of them!
Premium Chessgames Member
  wtpy: Just going over some of the wealth of games on this site trying to avoid the acrimony on kibitzer/Daniel/Rogoff, the latter of which I have sworn off and come upon this beautiful game. It helps me rememeber why this site is such a jewel. Thank you, Daniel. This game would be a great GOTD or Thursday or Friday puzzle if we ever go back to the good old days where we start with Monday (easy) and solve increasingly hard ones as we move into the weekend.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 38
from Move by Move - Tal (Lakdawala) by edwin.n.walker
ughaibu's bookmarked games
by ughaibu
Tal Fever
by chocobonbon
50 games better than that other Tal game.
by CheckMateEndsTheGame
19...Kh8 was a mistake.
from Spaniards Settin' Sail by fredthebear
Tal's Board with Excitement
from My 50 Years in Chess Compiled by parisattack by fredthebear
Modern Steinitz
from Monster Tal by Geronimo
by mughug
Walking Tal (aw1988)
from Punnier Games vol. IV by Memorable Quotes
Tamar's choice
by ughaibu
Keres vs World Champs Decisive Games Tal
from Keres vs World & Almost Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense, 6...Nge7 7. d4 Ng6 8. Re1
from The Ultimate Repetoire(1) by KKW
Game 38
from Move by Move - Tal (Lakdawala) by Qindarka
remembering Tal
by Yopo
Game 38
from Tal: Move by Move by ahammel
Game 11
from Power Chess (Keres) by Qindarka
Ruy Lopez
by nkvd
50 games better than that other Tal game.
by Retarf

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC