chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Baron Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa vs Howard Staunton
Match (1853), Brussels BEL, rd 6
King's Gambit: Accepted. Kieseritsky Gambit Kolisch Defense (C39)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Von Der Lasa/Staunton games
sac: 31.Kc2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-21-17  Altairvega: 22...Na2+ 23. Kd2 Qb4+ 24 Ke2 Bb5 25 Bb5 Re4+ is what I thought. Tine to look the game
Sep-21-17  Walter Glattke: 22.-Na2+ 23.Kd2 Qb4+ 24.Ke2 f5 25.e5? Qxf4
25.Qxa7 Rxe4+ 26.Bxe4 Qxe4+ 27.Ke2 Qxf4+ 28.Kd3 Bb5+ or 28.Ke1 Re8+
Sep-21-17  stst: One possible line:
22..............Na2+
23.Kd2 Qb4+
24.c3 Qxb2+
25.Bc2 Ba4
26.Kd3 Qxc2+
27.Kd4 Rxe4+
28.Rd4 b5#
Sep-21-17  stst: 50 moves!? - more than double that of the starting 23.....

Even if all agreed that should be the development, sorry to deny it - my humble opinion.

Sep-21-17  Altairvega: The comment of the move 22 gives the answer. My first move correct, my second move less correct..
Sep-21-17  NBZ: Ah got the order wrong: I had Rxe4 Bxe4 Na2+, but of course Rxe4? Nc3! is excellent for White.
Sep-21-17  bane77: I saw Rxe4 and Na2+ idea instantly but Rxe4 gives white an option to play b3 and escape with Kb2. Therefore Na2+ first, then Rxe4 and white is lost. Now if b3, Qa5+ wins. Also if Bxe4, then Qxe4 and black has many options like Qxd5, Re8, Ne5 or Bf5 with serious threats. I didn't calculate much but it is pretty obvious that white cannot defend.
Sep-21-17  drollere: i also started with 22. .. Na2+, 23. Kd2 Qb4+, etc. with Bb5 and Re4 in reserve. the offer to exchange Q's (28. .. Qc5), declined, suggests neither player thought the combination was winning.
Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  diagonalley: blimey... this was/is more like a saturday puzzle... pass
Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Does 22...Nxd5 also count as a winning (albeit second-best) line?
Sep-21-17  newzild: <An Englishman>

Unfortunately 22...Nxd5 appears to run in to 23. b3 Qb4 24. Bd2.

I actually got the puzzle correct today, although I was sure it was wrong because it didn't look clear enough.

Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  gofer: Okay, today I don't see much. Nothing earth-shattering. So unless I am blind again we could be looking at the following...

<22 ... Na2+>
<23 Kd2 Rxe4>

I prefer this move order to any other is it 100% forcing and makes absolutely sure that the white king is forced into the centre of the board where our rook sacrifice (opening up the e file) will have maximum benefit. Black threatens Rxf4. There don't seem an awful lot of good moves for white. Not taking the rook is far more difficult to analyse, but Bf4 cannot be protected directly or indirectly.

24 Qf1 Rxf4 -+

24 b3? Qb4+ mating!

24 Nc3 Nxc3
25 bxc3 Rxf4 -+ or Bxe4 Nxe4 -+

24 g3 Rxf4
25 gxf4 Qxf4+
26 Ke1 Re8+
27 Be2 Bb5
28 Re2 Rxe2+ (Rd3 Qc1+ Rd1 Rxe2# or Qg2 Rxe2+ -+ or Nc3 Nxc3 -+)

29 Kd1 Qf1+! (Rxe2 Qc1#)
30 Qxf1 Ne3#

Nice!


click for larger view

So Bf4 will have to move but there are not many good squares!

24 Bg3 Re3 -+

24 Rg5 Re5 -+

24 Bh6? Rhd8 -+

This looks okay, but I think that h6 is a very bad square for Rh1 to end up on as black is quite likely to be able to play Nxh6 Rxh6 Qf4+ in some variations.

So taking the rook seems to be the only choice!

<24 Bxe4 Qxe4>


click for larger view

Black now threatens Qxf4+ but also threatens Qxd5+ bringing Rh8 into the action without loss of tempo, It is difficult to see how white can defend these threats except by playing...

<25 Be3 Nxe3>
<26 Qxe3 Qxg2+>


click for larger view

27 Ke1 Qxh1 -+

27 Ke2 Re8 (winning the queen as Qxe8 is the only defence) -+

<27 Qe2 Qxd5+>

28 Ke1 Qxh1 -+

28 Ke3 Qe5+
29 K move Qxe2+ leads to the same result.

<28 Qd3 Qg2+>

<29 Qe2 Qxe2>

<30 Kxe2 Bg4+>

<31 Kd2 Bxd1>

<32 Kxd1 Nb4 -+> (4 pawns up!)


click for larger view

~~~

Yep!

Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Spoiler 22...Bb5 23.Qf1 Bxd3 24.Qxd3 Rxe4 25.Nc3 Rxf4 26.Nxa4 Na2+ 27.Kd2 Rf2+ 28.Ke1 Re8+

lol

*****

Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Oxspawn: If I had been black I could have lost a lot more quickly...
Sep-21-17  mel gibson: As per the alternative text the computer says:

(22. ..
Na2+ (♘b4-a2+ ♔c1-d2 ♖e8xe4 ♘b1-c3 ♘a2xc3 ♖d1-a1 ♘c3-a2 ♖a1xa2 ♕a4xa2 ♗d3xe4 ♕a2-a4 ♔d2-c3 ♕a4-a5+ ♔c3-d3 ♕a5-b4 ♕g1-d4 ♗d7-b5+ c2-c4 ♗b5xc4+ ♕d4xc4 ♘g4-f2+ ♔d3-d4 ♕b4xb2+ ♕c4-c3 ♕b2xc3+ ♔d4xc3 ♘f2xh1 g2-g4 ♘h1-f2 ♗e4-f5+ ♔c8-b8) +5.17/17 98

Score for Black +5.17 depth 17

Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  gofer: <mel gibson> Thanks for the computer analysis! I didn't even considered that line!
Sep-21-17  mel gibson: <Sep-21-17 gofer: <mel gibson> Thanks for the computer analysis! I didn't even considered that line!>

I saw the first move but not the rook taking e4

Sep-21-17  mel gibson: Following the text by the actual player the computer says:

23. Nc3
(23. Nc3 (♘b1-c3 ♘b4-a2+ ♘c3xa2 ♕a4xa2 ♕g1-d4 h7-h5 c2-c4 ♗b5-d7 ♖d1-f1 ♘g4-e5 ♗f4xe5 ♖e8xe5 ♖f1xf7 ♖h8-g8 ♖h1-g1 ♗d7-e8 ♖f7-f5 ♖e5-e7 ♖f5-f3 ♔c8-b8 g2-g3 ♕a2-a1+ ♗d3-b1 ♕a1-a5) -0.21/17 51)

score for white -0.21 depth 17

so the answer was a very poor move by black.

Sep-21-17  Pasker: I found Bb5 quickly because its easy since the bishop is immune to capture due to check mate. So Bb5 is a good aggressive move and the rest is just natural follow up. This doesn't qualify for a puzzle.
Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Two aspects of today's Friday puzzle (22...?) and game which I found interesting were:

(1) The win missed by one of the greatest players of this time, Howard Staunton, with <22...Na2+! 23. Kd2 Rxe4! -+.>

Stockfish 8 gives the following winning line for Black:

<22...Na2+! 23.Kd2 Rxe4! 24.Nc3>

24.Bxe4 Qxe4 25.Be3

[25.Qf1 Qd4+ 26.Ke2

(26.Ke1 Re8+ 27.Qe2 (27.Be5 Qxe5+ 28.Kd2 Qe3#) 27...Qf2+ 28.Kd2 Qxe2#)

26...Re8+ 27.Kf3 Re3+ 28.Bxe3 Qxe3#]

25...Re8 26.Rh4 Qxd5+ 27.Ke1 Qa5+ 28.Ke2 Qb5+ 29.Rd3 Rxe3+ 30.Qxe3 Nxe3 31.Na3 Qg5 32.Rxe3 Qxh4 33.g3 Qd4 34.Rd3 Bg4+ 35.Kf1 Qe4 36.Nc4 Qxc4 37.Kf2 Qc5+ 38.Re3 Qd4 39.c3 Qd2+ 40.Kg1 Qxe3+ 41.Kg2 Qe2+ 42.Kg1 Bh3 43.b3 Qg2#.

<24...Nxc3 25.Bxe4 Nxe4+ 26.Ke1 Re8 27.Be3 Bb5 28.b3 Qa5+ 29.b4 Qxb4+ 30.Rd2 Qb1+ 31.Rd1 Qxc2 32.Rd2 Nxd2 33.g3> (33.Qf2 Qc1#) <33...Nf3#.>

(2) Finding out about Baron Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa who was apparently one of the greatest players of his day, even though he never played a single "official" tournament game. Accumulating a winning record against Staunton, Anderssen and Lowenthal <in a series of "offhand" games> was no small feat.

If anyone ever puts together a list of the strongest players never to play an official tournament game, surely the Baron's name should be near the top of the list.

P.S.: I missed the solution big time with 22...Nxd5? which is refuted by 23. b3! ± (+0.91 @ 32 depth, Stockfish 8.)

Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White takes over the center...and wins.
Sep-21-17  drollere: <White takes over the center...and wins.>

yes, after move 29 black's choices are limited and defensive. at each move thereafter, white methodically finds the weakest point and exploits it.

Sep-21-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: In the old days only Anderssen could be relied on not to miss moves like 22...Na2+.
Sep-21-17  leRevenant: In all respects an extremely puzzling puzzle, not least as we were asked to kick off with the looser's move.
Sep-21-17  Patriot: I found 22...Na2+ 23.Kd2 but decided it wins at least a pawn after 23...Qb4+ and that was it for me. That was good enough to decide on 22...Na2+ because what else was there? It's not imperative to see 23...Rxe4 at that point and find a 'genius' move.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
22...? (Thursday, September 21)
from Puzzle of the Day 2017 by Phony Benoni
KGA. Kieseritsky Gambit. Kolisch Defense (C39) 1-0 Missed N+
from x( C39 ) KGA Allgaier Gambit, Kieseritsky Gambit by fredthebear
22...? (September 21, 2017)
from Thursday Puzzles, 2011-2017 by Phony Benoni
KGA. Kieseritsky Gambit. Kolisch Defense.
from MKD's King's Gambit by MKD
King's Gambit: Accepted. Kieseritsky Gambit Kolisch Defense
from KING'S GAMBIT CLASSICAL by gambitfan
KGA. Kieseritsky Gambit. Kolisch Defense (C39) 1-0 Missed N+
from Pins Ins and Outs, ECO C French & K's Gambit by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC