chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Paul Morphy vs Charles Maurian
"Checkpoint Charlie" (game of the day Dec-08-2008)
New Orleans (1866), New Orleans, LA USA
King's Gambit: Accepted. Ghulam-Kassim Gambit (C37)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 53 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 73 more Morphy/Maurian games
sac: 5.d4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-08-08  A.G. Argent: Well, to paraphrase a pal of mine who was, ironically, also from New Orleans: "Oh yeah, Morphy, he wudn't NUTTIN' nice!" Thanks <JG27Pyth> for the machine analysis in looking at Maurian's futility at holding off the onslaught. Spot-on.
Dec-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Lest anyone think that Charles Maurian was a complete patzer, he does have a win against Steinitz in the CG.com database.
Dec-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: I seemed to recall that Steinitz lost two to Maurian and won 5 or so. Maurian also beat Zukertort. I'll see if I can find those games later. Morphy's opponents were not so weak as many think.
Dec-08-08  WhiteRook48: Ha ha ha ... Morphy definitely wins. Since Maurian has to save the King, Morphy will be able to save his hanging Queen ... GO MORPHY!
Dec-08-08  DoubleCheck: Can someone post and explain what would of happened if Black tried to counter with 16... Qe4 or Qxc2. Thanks
Dec-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  amadeus: <what if Black tried to counter with 16... Qe4 or Qxc2>

17.Qh6+ Kg8 18.Qf8#

Dec-08-08  whatthefat: <JG27Pyth: Morphy is just <unbelieveable> ... Bxf7 is preposterous/genius!

I'm sure a twentieth century GM would give Morphy a much harder time but give Maurian some credit -- he isn't playing like an ape -- he's just getting torn to shreds by one of the greatest, if not the greatest, attacking geniuses of all time.>

It's worth noting that the Bxf7 sacrifice was not a new idea in this line.

Cochrane vs Staunton, 1842
Staunton vs NN, 1847

Dec-08-08  xrt999: 6...d5 is the refutation to this line. After 7.exd5 Qh4 8.Kf1, the game is in black's favor by a small margin, typical of the kings gambit; although white has traded down material, he has a slight spatial advantage and will attempt to build an attack.

After 8...Qf6, black is fine. White might try 9.Nc3, Black might try to put his knight on e7 and castle kingside, or even develop and castle queenside. White cannot castle.

I like black here, although I will probably never see this type of opening from white in a serious game. On the other hand, I would never play 3...g5 against the Kings gambit!

Dec-09-08  Whack8888: Hehe, nice game but no way Morphy was 150 years ahead of his time. I think he was about 50 or so years, maybe less actually, depending on what date you are starting from. Morphy was the best up until about early Lasker, mid-later Steinitz etc.

Morphy's games are certainly some of the best aesthetically, though. I am not sure if any other player, aside from Tal, had quite the beauty of chess done as much as Morphy.

Dec-09-08  JG27Pyth: <It's worth noting that the Bxf7 sacrifice was not a new idea in this line.

Cochrane vs Staunton, 1842
Staunton vs NN, 1847>

Wow, thanks for pointing that out...! Hats off to Cochrane. Nice to see Staunton remembered it well enough to whip some poor amateur with it when he got the chance.

Dec-09-08  Andrijadj: Well,if you are forced to play a move like Nf6 in ninth move,your defence and tactical vision is extremely bad...And one more thing,after 10 Bg5 why didnt he play Qe8...Cause after all attacks he has Bb4 and capture of queen on e8...
Dec-11-08  xrt999: < Andrijadj: This is such an idiotic game,blacks play is simply awful...It would be good to see Morphy trying this opening against Petrosian or Korchnoi... >

Thank you!

I really have never understood this part of CG: when a very strong player dominates a weaker player, everyone is so enamored and gushes over the very strong player and how awesome his play is, picking apart the weaker player and pointing out the tactical mistakes.

simply put, black played the wrong opening move, 6...Nc6, and lost the game! This is neither remarkable nor notable, it is just a very strong player dominating a weaker player.

Dec-11-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  amadeus: 10...Qe8 11.Bxf6 Kxf6 12.0-0!, and now the game is over: 12...Ke7 13.Qg5 Kd6 14.Rf6 Ke7 15.Rg6 1-0
Dec-11-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: This game should be at knight odds. Morphy never played Maurian even.
Dec-16-08  Andrijadj: Nice amadeus thanks for the insight...But still,same type of demolition happenned in the game,so that just proves my point... Xrt,that is exactly what I wanted to say...Maurian simply puts no resistance and that is why quality of this game is questionable...
Apr-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  heuristic: <6...d5 is the refutation> 6...d5 7.exd5 Qh4+ 8.Qf2 Qxf2+ 9.Kxf2

mo' better moves :
8...Kg7 9.Qg4+ Kf7 10.Qh5+ Ke6 11.d5+

13...Kf7 14.Bxf6 Rg8 (14...Ke8 15.Nc3 Rg8 16.g3 ;14...Rf8 15.Nc3 d6 16.d5 )15.Nc3 Ke8 16.g3

Nov-20-09  cornflake: <xrt999: 6...d5 is the refutation to this line. After 7.exd5 Qh4 8.Kf1, the game is in black's favor by a small margin, typical of the kings gambit; although white has traded down material, he has a slight spatial advantage and will attempt to build an attack>

6... d5 is not a refutation. after 7.Bxd5 (not 7.exd5) white still has a dangerous attack on the f file after he plays 0-0. 6...Nc6 is a vastly inferior line to 6...d6. For a possibly tenable way to play the 6...d6 line see Degraeve vs C Marcelin, 2002.

Aug-02-12  LoveThatJoker: Guess-the-Move Final Score:

Morphy vs Maurian, 1866.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF MORPHY.
Your score: 30 (par = 20)

LTJ

Jan-06-16  BobbyLev: Some of the comments were pretty negative about "Checkpoint Charlie. A few seconds of poking around on this website shows that Maurian was a regular sparring partner of Morphy's over years, usually playing Black. If you look at the record, Maurian was clearly a worthy opponent. Classical games: Paul Morphy beat Charles Maurian 2 to 0. Including rapid/exhibition games: Charles Maurian beat Paul Morphy 36 to 31, with 7 draws. Only rapid/exhibition games: Charles Maurian beat Paul Morphy 36 to 29, with 7 draws.
Jan-06-16  RookFile: Maurian beat Steinitz in an offhand game. The guy could play.
Sep-17-16  talhal20: Morphy is that genius who would beat any chess engine, simply because chess engines are made by humans at best possessing the brains above average. But that is not sufficient to beat Morphy consistently.
Jul-08-17  talhal20: No modern chess grand master has ever said he could beat Morphy. Apart from Fischer's assesment of Morphy,in an interview Fischer was asked a straight question if he could beat Morphy to which he replyed " I don't know " Fischer is considered one of the greatest ever chess players the world has produced.Now doubters draw your on own conclusion on Morphy.
Jan-26-19  RookFile: Morphy was great at the openings in his day. His opponents criticized him for booking up. Such a player today would have no problem being up to speed with the openings.
Jan-26-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <His opponents criticized him for booking up.>

Which ones?

Jan-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Hi Miss S.

Maybe something here, or is it a back handed compliment.

"For Morphy possessed the most profound book knowledge of any master of his time, and he never in his practice introduced a single novelty, whereas since his day the books have had to study the players." Steinitz.

Full quote here.

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

***

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or similar offensive language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, nonsense, or duplicate posts.
  3. No personal attacks, antagonism, name-calling or trolling of any member or their family, friends, associates, or business interests—including Admin and Owners.
  4. No posting of or linking to personal or negative information about any member or their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise.
  5. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal, at the sole discretion of the Moderators.
  6. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  8. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  9. Try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Mis favoritos
by juan31
Morphy is destructive like an enormous hurricane
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World by Atsa
"Checkpoint Charlie"
from The great hall of immortal games by tentsewang
Morphy !
from Life is not long enough ! Is there any ...... ? by arielbekarov
KGA Ghulam-Kassim Gambit 6.Qf3 (C37) 1-0 6...d5 is better
from PM Joins the Under 30 Crowd@Fredthebear's Place by fredthebear
KGA Ghulam-Kassim Gambit 6.Qf3 (C37) 1-0 6...d5 is better
from Attacks and Sacs of f7 Vol. II by Fredthebear by kishchess
#574 should be knight odds
from Morphy - Maurian by Calli
Knight Odds
from Super Muzio Games by Calli
1. Paul Morphy
by Roshon N
KGA Ghulam-Kassim Gambit 6.Qf3 (C37) 1-0 6...d5 is better
from M&M players... it's a mixed bag by fredthebear
New Orleans 1866
from Favorite Games from (1515-1916) by wanabe2000
piranja's favorite games
by piranja
Kings Gambit
by Nodreads
White uses lead in development and F-file to attack
from King's Gambit attacking games by Calar
KGA Ghulam-Kassim Gambit 6.Qf3 (C37) 1-0 6...d5 is better
from Attacks and Sacs of f7 Vol. II by Fredthebear by nakul1964
kings gambit accepted
by nadvil
Beginner lessons
by DrChopperz


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC