Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
George Alcock MacDonnell vs Henry Edward Bird
"No Need for Queens" (game of the day Oct-25-2018)
London (1874), London ENG
King's Gambit: Accepted. Kieseritsky Gambit Long Whip (C39)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 4 more G MacDonnell/Bird games
sac: 17...Bxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-15-09  WhiteRook48: those funny knight promotions
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: <Honza Cervenka>White missed another blow in his 26th move: 26.Qe4!! Rf7 27.Bxe7!! (Not 27.Qxb7?? for Rf2+! 28.Kg1 Bg2 etc.).

I looked at 29.♕b5+ c6 30.♕d3 (Stopping the Black Rook from moving along the 2nd rank and protecting the g2 Bishop). 30...♖f3 looks good, attacking the Queen to give Black time to retreat the g2-Bishop, but then I think White has 31.♕e4, with the double attack on the e7 Knight. 31...♖f7 simply allows 32.♔g2.

Jun-15-09  remolino: What a fanstastic pun!!!
Feb-25-10  tommy boy: what an imagination and calculation! This game is realy fantastic
Oct-21-10  sevenseaman: ...15.dxe4, ...17.Bxd5 ...22. f1=N+,...23.exf1=N+ are some of the remarkable twists in this very queerly conducted game by Bird. About 7 replays do not look too many.

How 38. bxc3 insulates the vital Black R on d2 from the high voltage White Q on a5, is a masterstroke.

The only thing one can say with a degree of certainty is that Bird knew his onions and where he was going!

I've liked the game immensely; pure entertainment and high drama on the road.

Oct-21-10  sevenseaman: I wouldn't be surprised if some one said to me - Bird was a prankster!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bubo bubo: <An Englishman: Good Evening: Amusing little gem, for all its flaws. Any other games featuring consecutive Knight underpromotions?>

Better late than never: The game S Schweber vs B Wexler, 1964 ends with two consecutive ♘-promotions.

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: The ♔night is dark and full of terrors ...
Premium Chessgames Member
  MJCB: Why not 33... Kt h2+, followed by 34... Rf1. unless I miss something, this is mate?
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <MJCB> 33...Nh2 is illegal and is not check.
Apr-04-18  areknames: <FSR> He obviously meant 32...Nh2++ followed by mate.
Apr-04-18  schnarre: ...Impressive...most impressive.
Apr-04-18  The Kings Domain: The wild and crazy games of the Romantic era.
Apr-04-18  AlicesKnight: The CG catalogue does not seem to have reference to the La Bourdonnais - MacDonnell games of a generation earlier (a different MacDonnell??). One of the best of these had a not dissimilar Q sacrifice and Black N attack.

click for larger view

La Bourdonnais - MacDonnell 1834 match; Black plays 13.... NxNd5! 14.Bxe7 Ne3+; 15.Ke1 Kxe7; 16.Qd3 Rd8; 17.Rd2 Nc6; 18.b3 Ba5; 19.a3 Rac8; 20.Rg8 b5; 21.Bxb5 Bxf3; 22.gxf3 Nd4 and again two Black Ns create havoc.

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: The amount of howlers in this "game" are only exceeded by the amount of bloopers

Its quite possible the amount of questionable moves comfortable exceeds the amount of sound moves, but who's counting?

Not me


Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 22...Nc6 was more precise. White missed 14.Re1!
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <areknames> Ah, OK. That's makes more sense. He's right.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: <AlicesKnight> The CG catalogue does not seem to have reference to the La Bourdonnais - MacDonnell games of a generation earlier (a different MacDonnell??).

Yes that is a different player - Alexander McDonnell. The game you mentioned is one of the greatest of all time in my opinion. It is in the data base:

La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834

Apr-05-18  AlicesKnight: <Breunor> Well found. The difference a missing 'a' makes..... La Bourdonnais vs McDonnell, 1834
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Great game by Bird!
Oct-25-18  Ironmanth: An amazing game!!
Oct-25-18  TheaN: This brilliancy is also riddled with inaccuracies which in itself isn't too bizarre considering the plentora of unnatural positions MacDonnell and Bird got themselves into.

It starts with Black's sac which is perfectly sound but should not lead to the advantage it did. After <18.Bb5+! ∓> White still in.

Following the game with the Bishop on c4 Black's in control until the underpromotions. Though a flashy combo, 22....f1=N+ = was not the correct move and Black should have simply reloaded with the brilliant and bizarre <22....Nc6!! -+>. White's completely stuck.

After the apparent trade off White could salvage the game with <26.Qe4! 0.00> basically stressing Black's forces into a draw. Once again the strength of 22....Nc6 is clear, it would have protected b7 here.

One may question missing the mate with <32....Nh2++ -#1 33.Kf1/g1 Rf1#>; even in time trouble that should have been obvious. Bird won so all in all it doesn't matter.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Shams: A deserved pun win for <Phony Benoni>.>

Yes, "No Need for Queens" is very good.

Oct-25-18  Isilimela: How about Crazeyritsky Gambit ?
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: George was clearly Alcock, no bull.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Henry Bird
by MountPixel
Queen Sacs, Part II
by Ron
Knight Underpromotions
from Various games by paladin at large
KGA Kieseritsky G. Long Whip (C39) 0-1Pawn roller, 2under promo
from 1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear
19th Century Chess & English, Bird, KIA, et al.
by mmzkr
by Cultus
King Cotton is King
by fredthebear
by eklee
Knight after Knight
from Favorite Names by Mayoigo2
Kingside pawn storm ensures owerhelming compensation for queen
from Romantic era of chess by Calar
TheTamale's favorite games
by TheTamale
Pawns promoted to knights make a brilliant queen sac
from Would you like my queen? by Endangered71
Two consecutive N-promotions
from Cabinet of Curiosities by Bubo bubo
Knight After Knight
from more favourites by goodevans
put in kieser collection at later date
from KGA -other lines by takattack
Queen sac for pawn storm winning with under promotions!
from MJCB likes those games by MJCB
Knights are gallant
from From the edge of disaster by sevenseaman
22...f1=N+, 23...exf1=N+
from Promotion: Knight (pre-1900) by Penguincw
put in kieser collection at later date
from KGA -other lines by takchess

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC