Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Boris Spassky vs F Gibson
WchT U26 07th (1960), Leningrad URS, rd 4, Jul-18
King's Gambit: Accepted. Becker Defense (C34)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 2,260 more games of Spassky
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-14-02  refutor: the king's gambit seems so strange to me. although i'm sure there's positional reasons behind it and i'm sure it's been played for 200 years the move 6.g3 looks repulsive to me
Dec-14-02  Kulla Tierchen: 3...h6 is an unusual move by black. I prefer 3...d6 to avoid the Kieseritzky Gambit if that is black's aim here.
Dec-14-02  Kulla Tierchen: 6...g3 is necessary to neutralize the black pawn assault after which white will castle longside, something which was already dictated by black.
Dec-14-02  judokausa1: The king's gambit is probably one of the most under rated openings available right now. The positional purpose of the opening is to create rapid development and a strong center. (note that in the end game white tends to have a queen side majority) a great book on this opening is "winning with the King's Gambit" by Gallagher. [he actually plays this opening at the GM level.]

6... g3?(I assume you mean g4 since fg was the move played in the game.) If 6... g4 7. Nh4 and the pawns begin to drop as white pieces gain a huge leap activity. Note that the h5 square looks quite yummy for the queen as well. white is vastly better due to his lead in development and open lines on the kingside. take note that the check with the pawn on f2 is a normal line I am sure Spassky is aware of. The text limits the scope of the queen bishop by controlling the f4 square. [a key square in the KG for both sides]

Dec-15-02  THE GENERAL: why decline the gambit?
Dec-15-02  Kulla Tierchen: <6... g3? (I assume you mean g4 since fg was the move played in the game.)> I did intend g3 but for white. Thank you for noting my typing error. I was responding to the comment by refutor that 6.g3 looks repulsive to him.
Dec-15-02  Kulla Tierchen: <why decline the gambit?> I have never seen a convincing line for black which declines the gambit. If one were certain that white would win in a tactical mle, then declining would put black in a slightly inferior, but considerably quieter, position.
Dec-15-02  refutor: thank you for the explanation kulla...i still think i'll stick to the ruy lopez though :)
Dec-17-02  drukenknight: As Kulla suggests, the h3 move already begins to dictate certain things will happen (Kulla suggests 000)

If it is true that black can dictate this result to white, then maybe white should simply accept a more closed in game and proceed with: not g3 but rather b3.

There is at least one Kasparov game with the early ...h6, the black player often traps the KN when he plays ...d6 in conjunction.

But this sort of approach w/ d6/h6 will take more time than the more classic version that starts with g4.

Perhaps white should play 4 b3 and start to play his own positional strategy.

Dec-25-04  russep: Can someone please give me a continuation on how this game would end if they had played on?
Dec-25-04  iron maiden: <russep> 25. Bd3 forces Black to lose either the exchange or a piece, since playing 25...h5 to open an escape square for the knight leads to 26. Bf5. He can't stop the bishop pin without giving up the knight.
Dec-25-04  russep: thanks
Jul-10-08  HannibalSchlecter: why doesn't black take on d4 on move 10?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Must be 11. Nxg4.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Nimzonick: <HannibalSchlecter: why doesn't black take on d4 on move 10?>

His light-squared bishop is en prise, and Qd7 protects it. Plus, not only would he only have a pawn for piece, but he'd have a somewhat annoying pin of knight and queen.

On another note, I must agree with Refutor that some moves in this opening just do not makes sense to me sometimes

Jan-25-10  Ulhumbrus: After 6 g3, the exchange 6...fxg3 7 hxg3 leaves Black with a backward f pawn.

After 9 Bc4 one may ask what Spassky is going to do with his QN on d5 and his KB on c4. One answer is that both pieces are going to help to restrain Black's backward f pawn by attacking the f5 square. The QN on d5 will go to e3 attacking the square f5 and the White KB will come to d3, also attacking the square f5.

After 10 Ne3 Black does not really want to let go his white squared bishop for the N, but on 10...Bd7 11 c3 Qe7 12 Qc2 0-0-0 13 0-0 Qe8 14 e5 Nge7 15 Nd2 Rhf8 16 Ne4 Black's f pawn remains backward.

12 ..Nf6 obstructs the f pawn. This backward f pawn is one of Black's main problems and Black does not manage to free it.

The pair of moves 13...Bh3 and 14...Ng4 ends up trapping the B on h3, and Black's attempt to avoid losing this bishop gets the N trapped on g4.

After 25 Bd3 Black has no answer to ther threat of Bf5 attacking the Black K, R and N all on the h3-f5 diagonal.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
KGA. Becker Defense (C34) 1-0 Bishop fork coming
from x( C34 - C35 ) KG Accepted Fredthebear's Apology by fredthebear
KGA. Becker Defense (C34) 1-0 Bishop fork coming
from KGB Secrets of the KOld War by fredthebear
Gambito de Rey
by Chessdreamer

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC