chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Nash vs Jim Jordan
Dayton (1979), Dayton, OH USA
King's Gambit: Accepted. Tumbleweed (C33)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [11536 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more games of Jim Jordan
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "C33"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-24-06  Jim Bartle: In 1979 Jordan must have been 15, while Nash was only five, so the result isn't so surprising.
Apr-24-06  Whitehat1963: Yeah, you're right <Jim Bartle>, Nash did play about like 5-year-old in this one, so it's not surprising.
Apr-24-06  Jim Bartle: And talk about stereotyping: Nash was white, Jordan black...
Apr-24-06  DP12: Runemaster White normally would play in this way against inferior opponents. By the way, to my eyes the best response to Qh4+ is Ke2.
Apr-24-06  AlexandraThess: This game explains why it is called King's Gambit, hehehee
May-06-06  CapablancaFan: Interesting...a guy who plays like this (Nash) ends up U.S. Chess Federation Scholastic Director! http://www.uschess.org/news/press/u...
May-06-06  monopole2313: What a coincidence - Jim Jordan also worked for USCF.
Apr-25-07  Judah: <<Runemaster>:Could someone please post the links to the other games with the Tumbleweed opening - I'm curious to see how White achieves an 80% score with such a weird opening!>

J Fort vs W Campbell, 1913
H Howe vs W Beers, 1940
D Rigby vs J Moylan, 1976
J Chiarelli vs D Jennings, 1979

Nov-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: The king is a fighting piece! Unfortunately, he's not a very good fighter...
Nov-01-09  YoungEd: The Nash Rambler crashes.
Sep-02-11  joshuap: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Kf2? No wonder I've never haerd of the tumbleweed. Maybe white accidentally toutched his king. 3...Qh4+ 4.Kf3?? This just plain loses. Maybee white accidentally moed his king To f3 also! That would be a very unlucky coicedence! Honestly, I think Kf3 was just an unfortunate blunder. 4...Qh5+ and black wins.
Aug-23-13  Conrad93: 3. Kf2?? loses on the spot to 3...Qh4+ 4. g3 fxg3 5. Kg2 gxh2 6. Rxh2 Qxe4+ 7. Nf3 and now black can 7. Bd6!. Black should be able to easily reach a winning endgame after trading material.
Aug-23-13  Shams: <Conrad> After 8.Rh4 how does Black force pieces off?

There are many ways for White to lose with this setup; I have found ...b6/Bb7 to be the most convincing.

Aug-23-13  Conrad93: 8...Qg4+, Shams, is the winning move.
Aug-23-13  Shams: <Conrad93> That move just drops the queen.
Aug-25-13  Conrad93: You aren't seriously going to argue that white has a solid or defensible position are you?

8...Qg6+ 9. Kh1 Nh6 and all black has to do is trade pieces.

Aug-25-13  Conrad93: 9....Ne7 is even more solid.
Aug-25-13  Shams: Of course White is losing; I said as much. If you like we can even name the refutation after you. 8...Qg6+ has been played many times before (at least three times against me in blitz) but that hardly matters for naming rights.
Aug-25-13  Conrad93: Basically almost any move works. White doesn't have any compensation for the weakened kingside after black castles.
Aug-25-13  Conrad93: I think more solid is what Steinitz use to play. 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. d4!? Qh4+ 4. Ke2.
Aug-25-13  Conrad93: Actually, does black even have to play 3. Qh4+?

Black could just play normal developing moves and still get a good position.

Aug-25-13  Shams: 3...Qh4+ is by far the best move; if Black plays anything else then it really is a game again (although still dubious for White as he did give up an important pawn on move 2.) White castles by hand or not at all in many KGA lines, so his King is not *that* bad on f2 after he gets in Nf3.
Aug-25-13  Conrad93: Shams, but after the pawn genocide by black, white has no way to recover in the endgame.

He will be stuck with a weak kingside and very few pawns, so I don't see how white has such a huge winning percentage.

Maybe the opponents were just starting out.

Aug-25-13  Shams: <Conrad93> I think that's probably it. Strong players don't play this way in serious games. Also, the sample size is small, and there is probably selection bias: White playing this way and losing is just ordinary, but winning with it is much more notable, so the latter games are more likely to find their way into databases.

You might kick the tires with it in blitz sometime. Of course it's terrible, horrible, no good and very bad, but if Black is imprecise White's advantage in activity can lead to a lot of fun for the first player.

Just don't tell your mother you play this crap. :)

Aug-26-13  Conrad93: Well, Shams, it's a bit too late too late for that. I already told her I play chess.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
White tries to chase a pawn with his king and loses his queen
from King hunts by Steffy
July 29, 2015
from Clever Openings by Brit
KGA. Tumbleweed (C33) 0-1 Royal skewer+
from 1 L Mirages in Laredo, KS landed @Laramie, WY by fredthebear
KGA. Tumbleweed (C33) 0-1 Royal skewer+
from x( C33 ) Fredthebear's K i n g B's G a m b i t by fredthebear
King activity!
by Minor Piece Activity
A True King's Gambit
from Super-brevities by FSR. by PinkLedDoor
A True King's Gambit
from Super-brevities by FSR


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC