| May-29-04 |
| mack: Whoops now Allen. |
 |
| Feb-16-05 |
| jesterco12: I feel dumb. I don't understand the problem here. |
|
| Feb-16-05 |
| Dudley: You can't lose two pawns for no compensation against Koltanowski and have the faintest chance of surviving. |
|
| Mar-07-05 |
| Mate Hunter: Black could play 4...Bd7 instead of 4...Nd7, then black don't lose the pawn on d5. |
|
| Mar-15-05 |
| Autoreparaturwerkbau: One way or another, can you estimate the rating of black's play? I wouldn't go over 1200. |
|
| Jan-09-06 |
| Jim Bartle: Maybe it was black who was playing blindfold. |
|
| Feb-18-07 |
| Rubenus: <Jim Bartle> If it is a simul, then usually the blind player has white. Besides, white is one of the best blindfold players ever. But I agree that black played horribly. |
|
| Sep-17-07 |
| sfm: If you can play 2.-,c5 you should not resign here but play on and try to learn. |
|
| May-08-08 |
| Salaskan: If Black played 4...Bd7 the game would continue 5.Bxd7+ Nxd7 6.exd5 1-0, so that really doesn't matter. |
|
| Jun-08-08 |
| TheKingOfSpades: i am of the belief that c5 while questionable (esp against Kolty), was nowhere near as horrible for black as d5?. |
|
| Jun-19-08 |
| number 23 NBer: I guess it's agreed that 2... c5 is not a good move, seeing as it's a 'Theoretical Novelty' according to this database. |
|
| Mar-16-09 |
| TheTamale: It is certainly odd that someone who plays as weakly as Black does here would survive after a mere two pawn deficit. |
|
| Mar-16-09 |
| MaxxLange: He seems to be very fond of his grudges. |
|
| Mar-16-09 |
| MaxxLange: please disregard the above comment - I posted it in the wrong place |
|
