< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Aug-18-12
 | | FSR: Surely Black can't survive after 9.Qg4+ Kxe5 10.d4+ Kxd4 11.Qxf4. |
|
Aug-18-12 | | The Last Straw: Made it to 10…♔xd4. |
|
Aug-18-12 | | TomOhio: Now, see? THAT'S how a King's Gambit game is supposed to be played... weird positions and combinations, crazy looking moves... total chaos. That's why I always liked it. |
|
Aug-18-12
 | | chrisowen: One roller coaster up tour queg4 in slow bury it hope in terrible it lane tooth in claw back ground be7 is a recipe for disaster in d6 it or ascent in d5 even g5 doll fun in the sun shred pawn to rights it d5 instead hokey cokey e5 as taking middle porch in buy it gook e6 fares no better in what asking is the sell in e7? |
|
Aug-18-12
 | | chrisowen: Manage in ko ala d5 gobble the stallion e5 and then find safe refuge escry in light so first idea us try line g4 bring him on key establish in evermore d4 c3 pastiche ditto in grab it you in mention expose the soft under-belly again double it dig in try 9.qg4+ kxe5 10.d4+ dellusions of grandeur in kingxd4 11.c3+ cocky punt in? |
|
Aug-18-12 | | Abdel Irada: <morfishine: Made it through to <15.Bxd8> but didn't see it all the way through to <24.Qxf6#> Do I get half-credit for guessing the opening was a Kings Gambit? :)> I think you get full credit for what you did find. The continuation after 15. ...♖xd8 involved suboptimal defense by Korchnoi, so can't be regarded as part of the puzzle. In fact, as <abuzic> has pointed out, winning Black's queen is not White's best line either; apparently 13. ♕h5! forces mate, which is far clearer than settling for queen plus attacking chances versus three minor pieces. By this criterion, either <abuzic> alone (if he found that solution without reference to silicon) or no one (if he didn't) gets *full* credit. And if that is so, it seems to me that we all get credit to the extent that we found our way to some advantage for White. By that measure, I award myself partial credit, and I am now 4.7165384/5 on the week. :-D |
|
Aug-18-12
 | | Jimfromprovidence: At first I thought 9 d5, with the threat of 10 Qg4#. Then I saw that that was too slow because black can check on h4 with his bishop, so 9 Qg4+ was necessary to force 9...Kxe5. Then I looked over the whole game and saw that it was "cooked', so I said what the @##@ is going on? We need a forensic chess detective to figure this one out! |
|
Aug-18-12 | | bengalcat47: This is quite a shock to see Korchnoi lose in this manner. If Morphy had been alive at the time of this game he would've thoroughly enjoyed it! |
|
Aug-18-12 | | Moonwalker: I got to 11. c3+, but couldn't keep track of the position in my head! |
|
Aug-18-12 | | njchess: 9. Qg4+ is not all that difficult. The game line is a bit tricky after 16. 0-0. But once you realize that White is "all in", it's just a matter of throwing pieces at the Black king. This game is yet another good reason not to play 5. ... Nxe4! |
|
Aug-18-12 | | TheBish: Lutikov vs Korchnoi, 1951 White to play (9.?) "Very Difficult"
This looks somewhat familiar, so maybe that helped to work out the attack. 9. Qg4+! Kxe5 10. d4+ Kxd4
Or 10...Kxe4 11. Qxf4#
11. c3+ Ke5
Now if 11...Kxe4 12. Qxf4+ Kd3 13. Qd4#, or 11...Kd3 12. Qe2#. 12. Bxf4+ Kxe4 13. Qf3+ Kf5 14. Bxc7+
White wins the queen, and will continue the king hunt from there. |
|
Aug-19-12 | | sevenseaman: <Jimfromprovidence> <Then I looked over the whole game and saw that it was "cooked', so I said what the @##@ is going on? We need a forensic chess detective to figure this one out!> Intriguing. How so? Not that I could see any tell tale signs! |
|
Aug-19-12 | | stst: One obvious course:
9.Qg4+ Kxe5
10.d4+ Kxd4
11.c3+ Kxe4
12.0-0+ Kd3
13.Qe2#
IF, as above, after 10.d4+ Kxe4, then
11.Qxf4#
See what's missing.... |
|
Aug-19-12
 | | Jimfromprovidence: <sevenseaman> <Intriguing. How so? Not that I could see any tell tale signs!> Some of the earlier posts put the idea in my head. Then two telltale signs for me were 7...Ke6 instead of 7...Kg8 and 8...d5 instead of 8...Kxe5. Now 9 Qg4+ leaves black with only 9 ...Kxe5 and the king hunt is on. No player of that caliber puts his king out there for slaughter unforced. |
|
Aug-19-12 | | morfishine: <Abdel Irada> Thanks for the input. Once a line begins to string itself out, I pretty much call it a day. For example, one mentioned castling either side (move 14?) which I looked at as winning for White (keeping the threat against <c7>) and the improvement for Black <15...Bxd8> which makes it harder for White. IMO, its important to ID main points, like <10...Kxd4> since 10...Kxe4 is answered by 11.Qxf4#, stuff like. Once the forcing line ceases, it becomes a tree, and thats when I'm done |
|
Aug-20-12
 | | LIFE Master AJ: This game has to be a record of some kind, lots of checks! |
|
Dec-16-19 | | m.okun: Of course, Lutikov could not calculate everything in advance, but caused a storm on the board with a sacrifice of the bishop on the seventh move. |
|
Dec-16-19
 | | HeMateMe: Helluva King hunt! Viktor Korchnoi is 20 years old here. I would guess he changed his response to the Kings Gambit after this game. |
|
Dec-18-19 | | m.okun: Lutikov is two years younger than the opponent. He was a very talented chess player, but he was ruined by drunkenness. |
|
Dec-19-19 | | Carrots and Pizza: This guy Lutikov smashed Tal and Korchnoi. I haven't heard of him before today. He's like a Paul Morphy from the 1950s. |
|
Dec-19-19
 | | perfidious: Lutikov gave Tal a rough ride throughout their careers (+5 -2 =8 overall). |
|
Dec-19-19 | | m.okun: About Lutikov: Genna Sosonko. My testimony (portraits of people of a bygone era). Moscow, 2003 (in russian). |
|
Sep-26-21 | | Whitehat1963: Ouch! What a buttkick! |
|
Dec-23-22
 | | GrahamClayton: Lutikov finished 14th and last in the 1951 Chigorin Memorial with a score of 2.5/13, but his two victories were over Mark Taimanov and this brilliant attacking game. |
|
Aug-15-24
 | | WTHarvey: White mates in 2.
 click for larger view23. ? |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |