chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Viktor Korchnoi vs Bruno Parma
URS-YUG (1971), Yerevan ARM, rd 1, Nov-??
Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Nimzowitsch Variation (E15)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 111 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Korchnoi/Parma games
sac: 64.Bxd4+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-31-05  The beginner: Maybe it was a mistake from parma to trade the Queens. Looking ahead to a 2 knight vs bishop pair in endgame isent that better for whom have the bishop pair in most situations ?

How many here would have played ?

46 ..Qh1+
47 Bf1 ..Qxh2

Jul-31-05  child of my tears: Great play by Korchnoi. 64. Bxd4! deflects the king too far away from the h pawn after which the knight on d8 is overworked as the only guard of the back rank. 67. Bh4 is crucial to the combo, preventing the other knight from getting back to guard h8. I got this one!
Jul-31-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Beginner>, looking quickly, I have to agree that the Queen exchange looks questionable. Maybe Qh1-h2, e4, and Qe5 would work.
Jul-31-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <I thought that move 64...Kf5 saves black in this.> Those poor black Knights have no chance against mighty Bishop pair of white. There are many ways to win it easily for white after 64...Kf5. White can play even immediately 65.Bd5 and none of black Knights can move.

The idea of 64.Bxd4+ was that black Knights cannot stop both white passed Pawns and the only problem here was to find and calculate correct order of moves, which was quite obvious. I saw quickly that 64.Bxd4+ Kxd4 65.h6 Nxb6 (65...Nf7 66.b7) 66.Bh5 wins and guessed that 65...Nc5 66.Bh5 or 65...Nb2+ 66.Ke2 (with white b-Pawn still alive) cannot improve anything for black although I did not calculate it in details. Pretty puzzle.

Jul-31-05  erimiro1: Envy you guys, I failed this time to find the solution. Indeed it's not that hard , but I decided that 64. h5?? will do, overlooking N:b2+. At least I know that Chigorin (against Tarrash and Steinitz) and Taimanov (against Fischer) made bigger errors!
Jul-31-05  f1list: First sunday puzzle I ever got. For what it's worth...
Jul-31-05  EinZweiDrei: I got the key move and the general idea. The exact game continuation, for me, is usually a whole other story when it comes to endgame puzzles.
Jul-31-05  aginis: <blackjacki2, vampiero, tamar>65.b7? Nb2+ 66.Kc2 Nxb7! 67.h6 Nd6 68.Bh5 e2!! 69.Kd2 Nbc4+ 70.Kxe2 Ne5 71.h7 Nef7 =

Jul-31-05  Koster: Not hard at all. Bd4ch was the 2nd move I looked at. Solves two problems- the loose bishop and black's connected passed pawns.
Jul-31-05  seagull1756: Loads of endgame puzzles this week, I have to say. It's very useful, for many of us often forget to count in endgames.
Jul-31-05  Happypuppet: Yesterday was the first saturday I got to the end. Today is the first sunday I got to the end. Maybe I'm just good with the endgame puzzles...
Jul-31-05  Greginctw: well i got it wrong. I thought b7 wins and didnt do anything beyond superficial analysis to support it. Learned my lesson.
Jul-31-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Desparado-white sacs his bishop so black couldn't take it with check. The knights were unable to stop those widely spread pawns.

Such open positions make knights hobble like the horses have extra bones in their feet.

Jul-31-05  ThomYorke: When I promote a pawn it can becomes another piece. One day I watched a game that kasparov chose another king. He had 2 kings. It was more dificult to ckeckmate him.
Jul-31-05  snowie1: It was easy to find_knowing there was a win! What I like about this move is, it drives computers wild!!
Jul-31-05  mahmoudkubba: black should've played 65 ...,NxP then he ws going to be safe!
Jul-31-05  mahmoudkubba: Also I really no little abt the condition, reason, and occassion of this game??
Jul-31-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  jahhaj: <mahmoudkubba> After 65...♘xb6 White wins with 66.♗h5 and the h pawn cannot be stopped. I think that was one of the moves you had to see to say you had solved the puzzle.
Jul-31-05  snowie1: The real reason black traded Qs is he
saw that white was ready to play the
very dangerous move,47.b6!
Jul-31-05  Happypuppet: <Desparado-white sacs his bishop so black couldn't take it with check.> I don't think that's the point of Bxd4. It's to deflect the king away from the h-pawn so it has a clear path to victory after Bh5.
Jul-31-05  Nicholson: Bxd4+ was honestly the first move I looked at. Then I was momentarily seduced by b7.
Jul-31-05  Shokwave: Easy Sunday puzzle...woohoo!
Aug-01-05  mahmoudkubba: <jahhaj>:I was thinking in another way thank u telling me that
Jun-30-09  WhiteRook48: 64 Bxd4+!!
Oct-04-12  Tigranny: I love games like this.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
bishops dominate limping knights
from magic endings by kevin86
64. Bxd4+!
from End game tactics by nakul1964
2 Bishops vs 2 Knights
from Endgames to Study by starscream74
Invisible Endgames
by jaigans
64.? (Sunday, July 31)
from POTD Indian (Not King's Indian,Bogo or Nimzo) by takchess
64. Bxd4+!
from End game tactics by patzer2
64.? (Sunday, July 31)
from Puzzle of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
64. Bxd4+!
from End game tactics by Jaredfchess
64. Bxd4+!
from End game tactics by nakul1964
64.? (July 31, 2005)
from Sunday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
2 Bishops vs 2 Knights
from Endgames to Study by xajik
64.? (July 31, 2005)
from Sunday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Jaredfchess


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC