Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Kotov vs Samuel Reshevsky
Zurich Candidates (1953), Zurich SUI, rd 23, Oct-11
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 112 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Kotov/Reshevsky game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-30-06  SnoopDogg: Clever Endgame by Kotov.
Apr-03-10  tonsillolith: What did Kasparov have to say about this game in My Great Predecessors? I'm guessing the section was about Reshevsky and not about Kotov. Was he remarking on a certain weakness of Reshevsky's?
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <tonsillolith> His main point was that Reshevsky shot himself in the foot at the tournament with this game and Reshevsky vs Geller, 1953. If you have Bronstein's book of the tournament, his notes on this game are wonderful.
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: Kotov-Reshevsky

click for larger view

engine suggested 55...Kc7 ( 1.12) but Sammy decided on 55...Nb1 ( 1.45)

the game was even-steven until white took a slight advantage with 54.Nxg4

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <wordfunph>

<the game was even-steven until white took a slight advantage with 54.Nxg4>

That doesn't make sense. White can't "take" an advantage out of thin air; Black has to make a mistake. The engine may not have perceived White's advantage until 54.Nxg4 was played, but that is not the same thing.

Feb-25-16  ZonszeinP: Exactly! Before that, the engine didn't have a clue...:)
Aug-04-17  cwcarlson: 52.♔e3 ♘c3 53.♔d3 ♘b1 54.♔c2 ♘a3+ 55.♔b2+- Bronstein; 54.c5+ bc 55.bc+ ♔c5 56.fg+- Houdini 5.
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: A couple of rounds earlier Petrosian had played 11 Rad1 against Najdorf and the game was drawn after a few moves; 11 e4 was new and was an improvement. Starting with 29 Qg4 White was outmaneuvered allowing Black to obtain promising play. 35 f4? was very weakening and could have cost White the game. White probably overlooked that had he played 36 h3 Black could have responded with the powerful 36..e5!. With 37..Rd8? Reshevsky missed the opportunity to get a powerful attack with 37..f5! 38 Qf3..e5 39 h3..e4 40 Qe2..Nf6 41 Nf1..h4. With 50..a4?! Reshevsky was playing for a win but subsequent events showed that he misjudged the position. Reshevsky must have missed Kotov's pretty 52 Ke3!. Still, Reshevsky would have had good drawing chances after 54..Nxg3 55 Nf2..Nf1+ 56 Kd3..e5 57 fxe+..Kxe5 58 Nd1..f4 59 Nc3..f3 60 Nxa4..f2 61 Ke2..Nd2 62 Nxf2..Nxc4; instead he continued his ill-advised plan of going after the a-pawn with 54..Nc3?!. After 57 b5! the knight was trapped (57 Kc3..b5 would have led to a draw). 57..Kc5 58 Nd7+..Kb4 59 Nxb6..Nb1 60 Nxa4..Kxa4 61 b6 would also have been winning for White.

Played in the 23rd (out of 30) round; entering the round Reshevsky was neck and neck with Smyslov. This game plus missing a win against Geller followed by losing to Smyslov in round 25 ended his hopes.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14) 1-0 Ns ending
from f6 again? by fredthebear
Instructive chess endgames I
by Jaredfchess
Grandmaster At Work
by Benzol
good endgame
from Games to review by Gambit86
Knight Endgame
from Endgames by parmetd
Game 397
from number 4 by Frodo7
Game 156
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by smarticecream
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from Zurich 1953 - Bronstein by vantheanh
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by Atsa
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Game 156
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Qindarka
Game 15
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by nakul1964
Game 15
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 15
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by isfsam
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by suenteus po 147
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Zurich 1953 by Pawn N Hand
Game 15
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (4) by AdrianP
Round Twenty-Three, Game 156
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by TigerTiger
Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14) 1-0 Ns ending
from EG Minors Excavating the Elements by fredthebear
plus 12 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC