| Aug-31-05 |
| Arquetipal: Wow, a queen sacrifice to check mate almost 15 moves later, this its awesomw, the game should be in the best 10 game of the history. |
 |
Aug-31-05
 |
| refutor: yawn...hello ignore list |
|
| Sep-02-05 |
| Yawnn: And for those who say Kramnik its a boring player, where are you now??? This shows how good player Kramnik its , |
|
| Sep-22-05 |
| Profesor X: I love the game, Kramnik made the horse sacrifice and win awesome, its in my collection of good games now. |
|
| Sep-23-05 |
| fgh: Some people just seem to ignore Kramnik's overall score against Lobron: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... |
|
| Sep-24-05 |
| Professor X: Some people just seem to ignore Kramnik's Trademark: a short draw!!!!!! |
|
| Sep-24-05 |
| ovcharka: 2!! <profesor x> and <professor x>. both are pathetic. also <arquetipal> and <yawnn>. how sick and lonely can you be who waste the time like this?? |
|
| Sep-24-05 |
| Green Square: <ovcharka> you are the pathetic one here, cause if you think this people its so sick and lonely to waste the time like this, you must be more sick and more lonely ans must be more dumb to answer to them dont defend Kramniks mediocrity this draws are a shame! |
|
| Sep-24-05 |
| ughaibu: Is Kramnik bashing coordinated with the school timetable? Perhaps I'm imagining it. There was something of a lull recently, at the least this further suggests that the army of Kramnik detractors are actually one person. |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| fgh: There is nothing wrong with defending something. You can't forbid someone to have his own taste, no matter if he listens to Igor Stravinsky or Britney Spears. It's his own decision, and he has the right to defend it with his point of view if he enjoys it. |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| ovcharka: i think this new <green square> name is made to attack me. only 1 post. i dont defend the short draws. i only want the stupid baby whines to stop. they ruin the chessgames.com. |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| you vs yourself: Regarding this one kibitz wonders and the theory that they are just one person, I've noticed some evidence to support it's only one kibitzer. This one person keeps misusing <its>. For example, take a look at this:
<this people its so sick and lonely to waste the time like this> I observed the very same misuse on the Kramnik's page.
|
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| fgh: The one who is most likely to be this person is <QueensGambit>. Not <Medusa> or <csmath>, neither <RetiSystem> or <BlitzChess>, but <QueensGambit>. |
|
Sep-25-05
 |
| tpstar: <Medusa> Try to vary your style each time. Otherwise people here might deduce your identity, although this process may take a while. At least you corrected "Professor" lol |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| fgh: <tpstar>: I wouldn't agree this mysterious guy is <Medusa>. |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| fgh: Just too take a nearer look:
Medusa
Member since Jun-05-05
Queens Gambit
Member since Jul-28-05
RetiSystem
Member since Aug-05-05
Blitz Chess
Member since Aug-07-05
Cosmo
Member since Aug-21-05
Garry Power
Member since Aug-28-05
Arquetipal
Member since Aug-31-05
Yawnn
Member since Sep-02-05
Profesor X
Member since Sep-22-05
Professor X
Member since Sep-23-05
Green Square
Member since Sep-24-05 |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| fgh: And also:
Verbatim 2HD
Member since Aug-22-05
You can compare their posts, their way talking, and make up your own mind. |
|
| Sep-25-05 |
| fgh: Could any premium rated member please be so kind and take a quick look with the search feature who was the first one to use "its" on the Kramnik page? Thousands of thanks. |
|
Sep-25-05
 |
| who: <fgh> there is no function that allows you to search for kibbitzing on a specific player. If you really care you can try to google <its kramnik site:http://www.chessgames.com>; |
|
Sep-25-05
|
| who: fyi the word its is used on page 1 of kramnik kibbitzing |
|
| Oct-13-05 |
| Queens Gambit: <fgh> <The one who is most likely to be this person is QueensGambit> I dont like Kramnik, and yes, i can be called a Kramnik Basher, but i aint making no duplicates , believe me i dont need to do that, i express my opinions about the worsest champ of the history without creating multiple accounts. |
|
