Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Jose Raul Capablanca vs Grigory Levenfish
"Slav to Love" (game of the day Jun-26-2010)
Moscow (1935), Moscow URS, rd 19, Mar-14
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran. Stahlberg Variation (D49)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 43 times; par: 17 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Capablanca/Levenfish games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: Not so decisive would be "21. Nh6 gh 22. Qh6, and Black is still alive" (Golombek) Completely wrong. 22. Bf6 with a mating net : 22... Bf6 23. Qh6 Re8 24. Bh7 Kh8 25. Bg6 Kg8 26. Qh7 Kf8 27. Qf7 mate. So Nh6 was the best here.
Apr-07-08  MichAdams: Alekhine, annotating the game, Alekhine vs Bogoljubov, 1934, for his Best Games book (published 1939), comments after his 9.0-0:

<Nowadays the leading masters consider that the line 9.e4 c5 10.e5 cxd4 11.Nxb5 Nxe5 12.Nxe5 axb5 13.Qf3! is decidely advantageous for White. But in 1934 the 13th move of White in this variation had not yet been sufficiently considered and the Meran Variation's shares stood pretty high. Therefore the quiet move in the text.>

Alekhine obviously hadn't appreciated that Petrov had found a sufficient defence in Reshevsky vs V Petrov, 1937 when he even emerged from the opening with an advantage.

Sep-14-08  AnalyzeThis: Incisive play by Capablanca!
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: HURRAH !!!! BRONSTEIN'S THEORY IS RIGHT !!!!!
Game Collection: x- - -> Bronstein's theory how Capablanca won
Jun-26-10  C4gambit: Why not 21. ... Bxf6 instead of gxf6? What am I missing?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <C4gambit> <Why not 21. ... Bxf6 instead of gxf6? What am I missing?>

If 21...Bxf6 22.Nxh6+ gxh6 23.Qxh6 Re8 24.Bh7+ Kh8 25.Bg6+ Kg8 26.Qh7+ Kf8 27.Qxf7 mate.

Jun-26-10  C4gambit: Never mind... i got it... 22. Nxh6+ gxh6 (otherwise Nxf7+ and the queen is lost), 23. Qxh6 Re8 24. Bh7+ Kh8 25. Bg6+ Kg8 26. Qh7+ Kf8 27. Qxf7 ++
Jun-26-10  C4gambit: Although I saw the bishop move to h7 after i posted my first kibitz, but thanks anyway to Benzol
Jun-26-10  randomsac: Once again the queen and knight team up for a lethal combination.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Capa can attack---as well as sharks can hunt.
Premium Chessgames Member
  SuperPatzer77: After 26. Qg6+, Black resigns in lieu of 26...Kf8, 27. Nxh8! (stronger than 27. Nxd8 and threatening 28. Qf7#) Qe8 (only move), 28. Qh6+ Kg8, 29. Qh7+ Kf8, 30. Ng6+ Qxg6, 31. Bxg6 (forcing the inevitable mate in next move) 1-0


Premium Chessgames Member
  DarthStapler: 28. Bh7+ Kxh8 29. Bg6+ Kg8 30. Qh7+ Kf8 31. Qh8# is faster
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: <randomsac: Once again the queen and knight team up for a lethal combination.>

Indeed. I read somewhere that some grandmasters have a saying "queen and knight, you'll be alright". Perhaps the queen and knight combine so well because they don't share each others powers, and this allows them to cover more squares for tactics like mating combinations.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: Great win by white, with excellent pressure applied to black's position.

Black had defensive resources, however, that he did not employ.

17... Bc7, as mentioned by <Mateo> in 2005, looks pretty good for black.

click for larger view

It protects against the knight fork on c6, and if 18 Ng4, then 18...g6 looks good.

click for larger view

White still has the bishop skewer on c6, with a small advantage to work with thereafter.

Black also had 19...h5, below, which protects against the devastating text move 20 Ng4.

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  SuperPatzer77: <DarthStapler: 28. Bh7+ Kxh8 29. Bg6+ Kg8 30. Qh7+ Kf8 31. Qh8# is faster>

You use the incorrect move number - 28. Bh7+ - the correct move number should be 29. Bh7+.

It is mate on the 32nd move below:

Your analysis is as follows:

29. Bh7+ Kxh8, 30. Bg6+ Kg8, 31. Qh7+ Kf8, <32. Qh8#>

Mine is as follows:

29. Qh7+ Kf8, 30. Ng6+ Qxg6, 31. Bxg6 any bishop move, <32. Qf7#>

It is not faster than mine. It's just the 32nd move of both analyses.

Well, it doesn't matter if your analysis is faster than mine. Just a win is a win (period).


Jun-26-10  screwdriver: great game
Mar-27-11  Whitehat1963: How can it both LOOK so simple and be so difficult for Guess the Move?
Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: Going into an ultra-sharp opening like this Meran variation was never Capablanca's common practice. He prepped his opening here.

11. Nxb5

click for larger view

Such prepared opening sac variations do not occur in the normal Capablanca game. It might be unsurprising in an Alekhine game, or might occur more familiarly with modern GMs who have these prepared variations ready to spring on their opponents (who hopefully did not prepare as well and would get lost quickly in the complications). I would like to know if Capablanca has other similar games in which he sprung a sharp previously prepared opening variation.

Premium Chessgames Member
  visayanbraindoctor: Note aside, if Capablanca had been diligent enough to have prepped most of his openings in such razor sharp variations, especially during his earlier years when he could wade through any complications out-calculating every one, what games he could have produced!

Just imagine dozens of Capablanca games with razor sharp openings leading to whirlwind attacks just like those of Alekhine or Kasparov's.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <talchess2003: A sharp game would have arisen after: 11. exf6 dxc3 12. fxg7 Bxg7 (12... cxb2 13. gxh8=Q bxa1=Q 14. Qxf8+! Kxf8 15. Ba3+) 13. Qc2 cxb2 and now white will face two appealing prospects of recapture. I would not mind playing white in this position, even though he is a pawn down he has good chances> [from Dec-17-03]

The comment quoted above from eight years ago is remarkable for the large number of obvious flaws contained in a short paragraph. <Chessical> has already commented that <13. Nc5> (in lieu of <13. cxb2>?) is a big improvement for Black in <talchess2003>s proposed main line. In addition, in the variation with <12. cxb2>?, the suggested <14. Qxf8> (annotated with ! in the original post) probably deserves ?? because after <14. Nxf8>, White is completely lost. On the other hand, in this line the obvious <14. Qxa1> is totally winning.

As far as the whole idea of <11. exf6> is concerned, it is dismissed by theory. According to Opening Explorer, the only example currently in the database is: E Kursk vs Keres, 1935, 0-1 in 30 moves, even though (as pointed out at page 44 of this thread: Kramnik vs Anand, 2008) Keres did not play the clearly winning <14. Bxc3+> (with <15. Bxa1> to follow), presumably due to exaggerated fears of dark-square weaknesses in this line.

Jul-27-13  builttospill: Been thinking about converting to a d4 player, so I'm testing things out on Guess-the-Move. From the looks of it this game has been heavily analyzed. But just in case anyone missed it, I had a strong recollection of a chess puzzle I'd solved from CT-Art as I was playing through. Perhaps not the same exact game, but a very similar theme.

On move 22 I saw a very clear mate to follow, as after Nxf6 Bxf6, black does not have the luxury of pushing his f pawn (which would block the light squared bishop -- the reason for Capa's zig-zagging queen moves in the game variation).

Anyway, after Qxh6 Re8, Bh7+ wins. (With Bg6+, Qh7+ and Qxf7# to follow. ) More forcing than the game continuation.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: builttospill> After 22. Nxf6+!? Black can coolly reply Kg7. So Nxh6 is best.
Oct-04-13  builttospill: <Calli> Sorry I missed your comment. But you are absolutely right, of course. I've been in the habit of calculating forcing lines first, but forgot to look at your line.
Oct-04-13  RookFile: Hard to find a defense after 17. Qh3. White has possibilities of:

1) Nc6
2) a knight move followed by Bc7
3) Bg5 with mating ideas on h7
4) g4 and g5

The one thing black does have is the nominal advantage of an extra pawn. You almost want to play 17....Rxe5 and get it over with, but over course, that is death against Capablanca - you're going to lose any random endgame when he has that kind of advantage.

Premium Chessgames Member
  naresb: There appears to be some refinement needed because multiple probabilities could open up. After 20. Ng4, Black plays 20... Be7, but he could have opted for:-- 20... e5 With this Bc8 pins Ng4-Qh3. Also Ng4 is now under attack by Bc8, Nf6. There are various ways with which both players can react to.

(A) White decides to delay exchange of White Bishop and Black Knight.

21. Bh4; h5
22. BxNf6; gxBh6
23. Nh6+; Kh8
24. Nxf7+; RxNf7
25. Qxh6+; Kg8
26. Qh7+; Kf8
27. Qh8+; Ke7
28. Qh5; and white has to struggle to gain superiority.

(B) White decides for immediate exchange of Black Knight with White Bishop.

21. BxNf6; gxBf6
22. Nxh6+; Kg7
23. Qh5; Qe7
24. Qg3+; Kf8 and in the absence of dark squared White bishop, White has to struggle to gain command over the situation.

(C) White decides to immediately attack Black King with White Knight.

20... e5
21. Nxh6+; gxNh6
22. Qxh6; Re8
23. BxNf6; Bf8
24. Qh7+ # (1-0)

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
The Chess Champions (Classical Era)
by Owl
Moscow 1935
by Benzol
98. "A murderous attack"
from Immortal Games of Capablanca, F. Reinfeld by mjk
Casablanca Trap - p. 102
from ATomsLearning by inlimbo777
Capa Kingside Slav
from Arcturus' favorite games by Arcturus
Game 481
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by demirchess
Moscow 1935
by JoseTigranTalFischer
from 500 Master Games of Chess III (part 2) by alachabre
June 26: Slav to Love
from Game of the Day 2010 by Phony Benoni
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by Chessdreamer
Capablanca demonstrating an almost perfect technique!
from Slavs more SLAVS, Semi-Slavs, the whole Sha-bang by fredthebear
Game 88
from World's Great Chess Games (Fine) by Qindarka
Game 69
from World Champion - Capablanca (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Game 481
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
from Elements of Combination Play in C - Reinfeld %jb by fredthebear
Ato's favorite games
by Ato
brontein theor white shark
from LIS SPECIAL COLLECTION by gmlisowitz
Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games
by KingG
capablanca best games
by brager

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC