chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Ljubomir Ljubojevic vs Nikola Padevsky
Olympiad Final-A (1974), Nice FRA, rd 2, Jun-16
Formation: Hippopotamus (A00)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

find similar games 1 more Ljubojevic/N Padevsky game
sac: 23.Nf6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-21-05  carpedieumjoe: quite obvious to me .... nice puzzle
= D
Jul-21-05  chesswonders: Nice one.
Jul-21-05  Nicholson: This is my first post here, though I've been lurking for awhile. I just have to say that this is the easiest Thursday puzzle I've seen so far.
Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <Nicholson> Hello! Welcome to the group! These exercises are great for keeping our tactics sharp. Yet the usual candidate moves are a check (23. Nf6+!) or a capture (24. Qxf7+) leading to the solution. Still, this is a winning motif that might be missed if we weren't looking for it. See you around.

After playing through the opening, I see why Black lost. Ugh.

Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Pretty puzzle and nice game. I think that this is quite typical game of Ljubojevic playing at olympiad. He very often played especially with white pieces some uncommon line like French Defence with 2.d3, which is not much ambitious but which usually eliminates opponent's opening preparation, and then outplayed the opponent with unbelievable ease from even position. Of course, Nikola Padevsky's unorthodox treatment of opening in this game, which probably was not the best, did not make great obstacles to him.
Jul-21-05  VishyFan: quite easy, but a nice one.....
Jul-21-05  Knight13: I was looking at 23. Nxg5 hxg5 24. h6 Bxh6 25. Nxb6 cxb6 26. Qxf7. Does this work?
Jul-21-05  SamuelS: <Knight13>, at least it does not lead to checkmate. For example, Black can play 25...Qe6 26. Qxe6 fxe6 27. Nxa8 Rxa8 etc. On the other hand, Black does not have to take the knight by 23...hxg5, but can play 23...Kg8 instead. Forced checkmate is always the best option.
Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I thought of Nf6 and Ng5+ immediatley but frst went for ( after discarding 23. Ng5+) 23. Nf6+ Bf6 24. N:g5+ etc Then 23. Nf6+ B:f6 24. Q:f7+ Bg7 25. Rd7 ..then the two ideas came tgether so I got the game continuation and after 25. Ng5+ h:g5 26 h6 wins in all replies I could see..a nice combination. The question being where did Back go wrong - he couldn't castle because of his h6 pawn so he had to "shuffle" his King to the K-side but maybe that wasn't wrong:maybe some other move?
Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: What about 9. ...Bb7 10.Be2 d5? may have been better ? But then is 9. .. Bb7 10. B:d6 but then maybe 10. 0-0 !?

Perhaps 9. ... Nf6 10. Bd3 Bb7 (Ne:4!?) 11. b4 Qd7......?

Black can wait and see whether to castle either side perhaps.

Jul-21-05  bishopmate: can someone explain to me why black didn't castle and chose to waste tempi and block his rook by moving over one by one to h7??
Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Black couldn't castle at move 9, <bishopmate>, because white had a double attack on his h-pawn. Castling would have removed the rook from its protection, so black had to "castle" much more slowly.
Jul-21-05  paul dorion: <bishopmate> by castling instead of playing h6 , black would have invited Bh6 followed by h4-h5 as seen in the Dragon-Yugoslav variation. In the present case , black would have no counterplay to compensate. Padevsky played passively , not contesting the center and Ljubo had the board for himself.
Jul-21-05  xxdsdxx: Hmmm. I enjoy using the sjkbase board in quiz mode for these puzzles. I started with the obvious check (Nf6+), noted the forced Bxf6, followed that with Qxf7+, another forced Bg7. Thought a moment, hmmmm, Nxg5+, hxg5 forced again, h6! and there ain't no way out of this! hxg7#!!!!
Jul-21-05  xxdsdxx: Looking at these posts, I realized that it worked either way. The OTHER check (Nxg5+), hxg5 (preferred over Kg8), Nf6+ Bxf6 forced, Qxf7+ Bg7 forced, h6!!! and there ain't no way out of this! Two trails to the same ending, no wonder I found it so quickly! & I thought I was a learning around here LOL!!!
Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: 11..Kg8 looks correct.
Jul-21-05  YouRang: Woo hoo! I can't believe that after blowing yesterday's easy puzzle, that I got this one! The knight 'sacrifices' were the only forcing moves, and they allowed the queen, pawn and rook to move in for the kill.
Jul-21-05  EinZweiDrei: I got it, must be easy.
Jul-21-05  Knight13: <SamuelS> Thanks! I got it! :)
Jul-21-05  zabbura2002: <xxdsdxx: The OTHER check (Nxg5+), hxg5 (preferred over Kg8), Nf6+ Bxf6 forced, Qxf7+ Bg7 forced, h6!!!>

I think Nxg5+ is even more frightening for Black.. it might lead to a mate if Black blunders by 23. ..Kg8 24.Nf6+ where ..Kf8(or..Bxf6) 25.Qxf7#

Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This game reminds me of a Napier win-in which he sacrificed a queen and mated by double check. Good attack by white.
Jul-21-05  Backward Development: I too looked at 23.Nxg5+ I usually spot all the tactical motifs in a puzzle, just play the moves in the wrong order! D'oh!
Jul-21-05  hpfisch: It was my first time to visit and try one of these. Interesting and rather easy. Thanks
Jul-21-05  BishopofBlunder: First time I ever solved a Thursday puzzle. And by solved, I mean actually following through with the combination instead of just "guessing" the right move, like I usually do. :)
Jul-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: Hippos are hard to understand; they shouldn't DO anything. Doing something is White's problem. But with ..Nc6 and ..e5 Padevsky DID something himself with severe consequences.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Not in the Art of Attack, but in CT-ART
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by howardb86
ct-art number 321 sac brings king to side epaulette problems
from how to beat your dad at chess _general collectio by howtobeatyourdad
23.? (Thursday, July 21)
from Puzzle of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
23.? (Thursday, July 21)
from POTD French by takchess
23.? (July 21, 2005)
from Thursday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Not in the Art of Attack, but in CT-ART
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by Jaredfchess
Not in the Art of Attack, but in CT-ART
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by ksadler
Formation: Hippopotamus (A00) 1-0 23.?
from How d'ya spEll Hipoptamus? Is that 1 'p' or 2? by fredthebear
Formation: Hippopotamus (A00) 1-0 23.?
from 25 collection A-D-E of Fredthebear by fredthebear
25 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection X by wwall
Not in the Art of Attack, but in CT-ART
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by sdbehrendt
180
from Yugoslav Chess Triumphs, Part 1 by Chessdreamer
Not in the Art of Attack, but in CT-ART
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by Ziiggyy
23. Nf6+!
from 1974 Chess Olympiad by chessmoron
25 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection X by PinkLedDoor
23. White to Move
from Mating Net's Tactical Favorites by Mating Net
Not in the Art of Attack, but in CT-ART
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by nakul1964


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC