chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Savielly Tartakower vs Henry Ernest Atkins
"Atkins' Diet" (game of the day Oct-09-2004)
London (1922), London ENG, rd 9, Aug-11
Four Knights Game: Italian Variation (C46)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,364 more games of Tartakower
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-09-04  notsodeepthought: Shoot, I didn't expect to start such a debate when I commented on the need for an apostrophe - or lack thereof - in my earlier post. Coming soon: my thoughts on the use of the semicolon... nah, I'll spare everyone that topic.
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: I think Tartakower could have resigned much much earlier in this game. Guess he was @#$%* off or something....or maybe he had a little of that "Marshall" spirit on this day.
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: From http://www.write101.com/sample.htm:
<When you're using names that end in -S, you follow the same rules as with any other name and add apostrophe S:

Chris's car, Bridget Jones's Diary.>

Oct-09-04  Seraph88: This is was a great game.
I would like to see more games like this.
Oct-09-04  Catfriend: Really liked the confident way Atkins attacks!
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <offramp> From the site you gave "Some words sound awkward when an apostrophe 's' is added: Jesus's disciples.

The accepted form here is to just use the 's' apostrophe:

Jesus' disciples."

I'd say it's the same for Atkins' Diet as opposed to the clumsy sounding Atkins's Diet.

The usual rules for using the apostrophe with possessive nouns are nicely summarized by example at http://www.dowlingcentral.com/MrsD/...

Oct-09-04  Catfriend: <patzer2> you added it to the collection about deflections. Can you explain please why 19..♖a6!! is a deflection? Perhaps I just don't know the precise definition.
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Catfriend> A strong "deflection" move forces (i.e. deflects) your opponent to a square that weakens their position and strengthens yours. In this case, 19...Ra6!! initiates a whole series of deflection moves to weaken the White position and give Black an overpowering attack. Note that if 20. cxb4? then 20...axb4! 21. Qc2 Bxa2+ 22. Kc1 Rxb6 is immediately decisive.
Oct-09-04  Catfriend: thanks a lot!
Oct-09-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Mack> I've changed my mind and will defer to conventional useage and your suggestion of "Atkins Diet." "Atkins Diet" without the apostrophe is apparently the singular trademark name.

If it were not for the trademark, I suppose it could be Dr. Atkins's Diet or Dr. Atkins' Diet if you think it sounds less clumsy that way. I've even seen it on the internet as the ridiculous "Atkin's Diet." Best I think is to refer to it by the official trademark or trade name "Atkins Diet."

Oct-11-04  Sadgrinner: Can someone please tell my why Atkins doesn't play 20. ...b5 to win the queen?
Oct-11-04  Swindler: The Queen can escape to the c2-square.
Oct-11-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willem Wallekers: <Sadgrinner> Qc2
Oct-11-04  Zaius: <Granite> I completely agree with your assessment. Since this is a pun that refers to a man that did not come up with the well known diet, you should be allowed to say that it is his diet. The connection between "Atkin's Diet" and "The Atkins Diet" is to be made by you, the reader. The writer of the pun is simply making you "pronounce" the title in your head and letting you make your own connection.
Oct-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: <Zaius> Exactly what I was trying to convey as well, in my own primordial way.
Oct-14-05  Averageguy: Dr Atkins died while on the Atkin's diet.
Understanably, this wasn't good for business.
Jan-23-06  Timothy Glenn Forney: A very fun game to move through.Great Tactics by Atkins,he really understood the Zwischenzug tactic.19...♖a6!! brilliant move.
Aug-11-07  sanyas: 38...♗f5+ mates in three.
Jun-07-11  jerseybob: Atkins' handling of the whole game reminds me of Lasker: the opening unpretentious but effective, the middlegame deadly. White's whole idea of castling long with the center lines open couldn't have been more wrong. There was never any chance of a kingside attack.
Jun-08-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Atkins is a remarkable player - an amateur who won the British Championship 9 times in 11 attempts. He tied for first in 1904 (his first championship) but lost the playoff to William Ewart Napier. Then he won every year from 1905 through 1911. Then he took 12 years off, and won again in 1924 and 1925. In 1937, he finished equal third at age 65. Oh, and then there was Hanover 1902, where he finished third, behind Janowski and Pillsbury but ahead of Marshall and Tchigorin. There is no doubt that if he had devoted himself to the game he would have been one of the world's top players.
Jun-08-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: Some good advantage trading by Atkins, but Tart should have gotten the better game from the opening. What is wrong with 8. Bxc6+ destroying blacks Q side pawn formation permanently? Black can have the two bishops. Tarts'. Q side castling was very ambitious considering how unsettled the center of the board was.

Atkins was a great British player. Tarts' lack of pragmatism in the opening helped him a bit.

Jun-08-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <SteinitzLives: Some good advantage trading by Atkins, but Tart should have gotten the better game from the opening. What is wrong with 8. Bxc6+ destroying blacks Q side pawn formation permanently?>

It's been an unpopular move, rightly or wrongly -- only two in the database. Here's an example featuring a cg.com kibitzer.

Smejkal vs J Cervenka, 1994

Tartakower won some good games after 8....exd4 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 10.Qxd4.

Tartakower vs Reti, 1920

Tartakower vs Bogoljubov, 1922

Jun-08-11  parisattack: <jerseybob: Atkins' handling of the whole game reminds me of Lasker: the opening unpretentious but effective, the middlegame deadly. White's whole idea of castling long with the center lines open couldn't have been more wrong. There was never any chance of a kingside attack.>

I think that is a good comparison! The book of his games is a bit HTF but there are some real gems in it. <FSR> is correct - devoted to the game he would have been a chess power in his day.

Apr-09-14  Conrad93: Why would one of the Founding Fathers of Chess castle queenside in that postion...

Bizzare!

Jul-15-17  Muttley101: Not sure that 000 was the real problem, playing at a rook odds probably was :)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Four Knights Game: Italian (C55) 0-1 Reinfeld checkmate puzzle
from 4 NW 4 NE 4 SW 4 SE Good to Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 44
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Qindarka
October 9: Atkins' Diet
from Game of the Day 2004 by Jaredfchess
Four Knights Game: Italian (C55) 0-1 Reinfeld checkmate puzzle
from yFredthebear's Diagonals Diagonals II by fredthebear
keypusher's bookmarked games
by keypusher
September / October, p. 140 [Game 155 / 4171]
from American Chess Bulletin 1922 by Phony Benoni
Game 44
from 500 Master Games of Chess by smarticecream
Games I Like
by arctic tern
36. Rxc6!+
from Double Attack by patzer2
London 1922
by Benzol
42b
from Checkmates 18+ by Kasputin
Game 44
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Jersey Joe
October 9: Atkins' Diet
from Game of the Day 2004 by Phony Benoni
Best of the British
by Timothy Glenn Forney


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC