chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Jackson Whipps Showalter vs Geza Maroczy
London (1899), London ENG, rd 12, Jun-14
Horwitz Defense: General (A40)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Showalter/Maroczy games
sac: 30...Rxd2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: "No, Mr. Showalter...I expect you to resign!"

I love Maroczy's fifth move. He had a knack for the offbeat.

Jan-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: As keypusher noted almost seven years ago, Maroczy's "offbeat" 5...g5, while perhaps not as good as the "correct 5...Bd6 or 5...c4) set the tone for this game and posed problems for Showalter he was unable to solve. Given Showalter's efforts to set up a Stonewall formation (I hate his 4. c3) Maroczy's move livened up the game without incurring any major risks.

Showalter should surely have responded 6. Nh3 instead of his 6. fxg5 which gave Maroczy exactly what he wanted--a King's side attack.

On the other hand, Showalter's courageous 7. Nf3 was excellent, and Maroczy rightly declined to go in for 7...Qxg2 8. Rg1 Qh3 9. Rg3.

The first real crack in Showalter's armor came with his limpid 10. Nf1 (10. b3 was much better). Maroczy was then in the driver's seat.

But Maroczy erred with 13...NxB, Showalter missed the fine intermediate move 14. h3 that would have led to equality. Tne Tournament Book says that Showalter should not have recaptured Maroczy's Knight with 14. N1xN but instead should have recaptured with his Rook or his Queen. This is all wrong. The question was not which piece to use to recapture but whether to drive away Maroczy's Queen with 14. h3 first. Both the players and the Tournament Book missed this (as did I--but Fritz found it in a nano-second).

Showalter was still in the game until his 21st move. He needed to play 21. Qg2 in the following position:


click for larger view

Instead, Showalter played 21. Ne1 and Maroczy then swept him off the board beginning with his brually effective 21...e5. 21. Ne1 was Showalter's last chance. The rest of the game was a massacre.

Maroczy is generally known as a positional and defensive player. This game shows, however, that he could more than hold his own in a tactical brawl. He chose to precipitate this kind of game with his 5...g5, and he was simply too good for Showalter in the cut and thrust struggle that resulted.

A fun game for Maroczy fans.

Jan-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: One wonders whether Maroczy knew of the efforts by Janowski with 5....g5, played in two of the latter's matches with Showalter not long before this encounter.

From an objective standpoint, I have my doubts about 5....g5, but psychologically, it has the virtue of not allowing White to settle behind the ramparts and get 'his' type of game.

Mar-14-19  Retireborn: <perf> Maroczy almost certainly *did* know those Janowski games; in "Hunderd Schachpartien" he gives 8...f5 a ! and implies that because it prevents e4 it's an improvement on the ...Nf6 that Janowski played.

<KEG> Many thanks for your notes, which I've found helpful. Maroczy doesn't notice 14.h3! either; his comment on 14.N1d2 is "White sets a pretty trap."

I don't know if it's given in the tournament book, but he's referring to the possibilty of 17...Qxg2 18.Rg1! Qxe2 19.Rxg8+ Bf8 20.Bd1!! (20.Rhh8 not enough, although he doesn't say why) Qxe3 and now he gives 21.Nh4 with the ideas of Bh5+ and Ng6 as winning, although Houdini thinks that Black can hold with 21...Ne7! then; instead 21.Ne5 seems to win handily.

A fun game for Maroczy fans, indeed.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Variation on p. 37, Stonewall. Note 6. fxg5? (Better 6. Nf3!)
from Soltis Book by Jersey Joe
Noteworthy Games
by BAJones
64idi0t's_1
by 64idi0t
Variation on p. 37, Stonewall. Note 6. fxg5? (Better 6. Nf3!)
from Soltis Slow Queen Pawn Book by fredthebear
Variation on p. 37, Stonewall. Note 6. fxg5? (Better 6. Nf3!)
from Soltis-Colle by skybluesky
The Two Chess Careers of Geza Maroczy
by Resignation Trap
Variation on p. 37, Stonewall. Note 6. fxg5? (Better 6. Nf3!)
from White Walls, Black Stones, and Read Newspapers by fredthebear
Variation on p. 37, Stonewall. Note 6. fxg5? (Better 6. Nf3!)
from Soltis Slow Queen Pawn Book by mneuwirth
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC