chessgames.com

William Ewart Napier vs Mikhail Chigorin
Monte Carlo 1902  ·  Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Main Line (C51)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 2 more W Napier/Chigorin games
PGN: download | view Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The feature find similar games (see link above) will show you lists of games with similar openings.

Java Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Chess Viewer Deluxe Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-29-04   shr0pshire: This game won the Rothschild Brilliancy Prize in the Monte Carlo Tournament.
Feb-13-05   Kenkaku: If 37...Rh7 it seems 38. Rxf6 wins fairly easily.
Jan-24-08   Bartleby: From John S. Hilbert's biography, 'Napier: The Forgotten Chessmaster':

Of his twentieth round encounter with Chigorin at Monte Carlo, Napier wrote in "Amenities" that "at Monte Carlo in 1902 my opponent on the last day was Chigorin. I decided to celebrate with a gambit, and so gave him to understand the night before. In the morning I steered into the Evans, confident that he would not expect an opening that had scarcely been out of the stable since its crippling in the St. Petersburg event of 1896. He used the old defense. After the game he asked what new play I had in mind for Lasker's Defense, and when I replied 'None,' he said good-naturedly that I had a talent--for poker! After that agreeable little memento it was a bit comforting to receive the brilliancy prize for the game."

A fine chess writer, as well as a prodigious talent. As quotable as Tartakower. My favorite of Napier's is: "In the laboratory, gambits all test unfavorably; over-the-board, all gambits prove sound."

Apr-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  ToTheDeath: Nice example of a slow building attack.

One possible line given by Rybka is 24... Bxg1 25. Rxg1 Qb6 26. Nd4 Re8 27. Qg4 Rfe7 28. Qg3 Qc5 29. Bf5 Nf8 30. Ne6 Nxe6 31. Bxe6+ Kh8 32. Bxf6

Apr-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <ToTheDeath> After 24...Bxg1 25.Rxg1 Qb6 26.Nd4, Fritz preferred: (-.84) (27 ply) 26...Qc5 27.Rxg6 Qa3 28.Nb5 hxg6 29.Nxa3 gxf5 30.Bxa5 fxe4 31.fxe4 b6 32.Bb4 f5, with some advantage for Black.

After 26...Re8? 27.Qh5 Qc5, Fritz indicated the game is equal.

After 26...Re8? 27.Qg4?, Fritz showed that Black again has some advantage with: 27...Qc5 28.Qg3 b5 29.Be6 b4 30.Bxf7+ Kxf7 31.Ne3 Rxe6 32.dxe6+ Kf8.

Finally, Fritz indicated the game is equal, in your line after: 29...Qa3 30.Nb5 Qc5. The move 29...Nf8?? leads to a quick loss for Black.

Apr-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  ToTheDeath: Those lines are accurate, though not quite forced as there are many alternatives along the way. My comment was simply an example of plausible play. I wouldn't put a lot of faith in Fritz's evaluation of positions with great material imbalance- computers still struggle with the concept of compensation.
Apr-29-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: Even though White will still have a strong attack, Fritz indicated Black should have accepted the win of the exchange, with a resulting position with some advantage for Black.

L. Hoffer in "The Field" stated regarding 24...Ne5: <The attack remaining the same, rook or no rook, Black should have taken the rook.>

Pillsbury stated: <If 24...Bxg1 25.Rxg1 Ne5 26.Nd4, and White will regain at least the Exchange. It will be noticed that the Black Knight at a5 is the cause of his difficultly. If for Black 25...b5 26.Rxg6 hxg6 27.Qxg6 Re8 28.Nf4 with a winning attack.>

Black's move 27...g5?, considerably shortened Black's resistence.

L. Hoffer commented regarding 27...g5: <A desperate remedy, hardly improving matters.>

Pillsbury stated: <27...Kh8 is probably better, but White's attack is tremendous.>

Fritz agrees that 27...Kh8 was a better move, and also agrees that White's attack was tremendous. Even if Black had played 27...Kh8, Fritz indicated White's position was winning.

After 27...Kh8 28.Rag1 b5 29.Bf5, Fritz found White to be winning after: 29...g5 30.Qg3 Nb7 31.f4 gxf4 32.Qxf4 Nc5 33.Be6, or 29...Nb7 30.Qh4 g5 31.Qh5 b4 32.Bxb4 Qb6 33.f4 Qxb4 34.Qh6, or 29...Nb7 30.Qh4 g5 31.Qh5 Nc5 32.f4 b4 33.Bd4 Ncd3 34.fxe5 Nf4 35.Qh6 fxe5 36.Rxg5.

Improvements may be found for Black, but I believe by move 27, White's attack is decisive.

Apr-29-08   sharkw: Surely White's 10th and 11th moves have been mixed up - after 10. Nc3 Black can just reply 10...Nxc4.
Apr-29-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  ToTheDeath: <Pawn and Two>: Excellent annotations!
Apr-30-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <sharkw> The game score is correct.

Pillsbury stated after 10...Ne7: <Probably preferable was 10...Nxc4 11.Qa4+ c6 12.Qxc4 Ne7. As played, it will be seen that the knight is left completely out of it later on.>

L. Hoffer in "The Field" noted that the game through 14...Bg4, followed a known book line. After 14...Bg4, Hoffer stated: <All book so far, and also the text move, but the latter bad book, as Chigorin ought to know, the correct move being 14...Rb8, followed by the advance of the b-pawn. If Black can make no diversion on the queen's side - his strength - the attack on his king's position must become too powerful.>

Fritz agrees with Pillsbury that 10...Nxc4 11.Qa4+ c6 12.Qxc4 Ne7 is a preferable line for Black. Fritz indicates Black has a small advantage in this line, while after 10...Ne7 11.Bd3 0-0 12.h3, Fritz rates the position as equal.

Fritz does not agree with Hoffer's evaluation of 14...Rb8 as opposed to 14...Bg4. Fritz finds both moves playable, but indicated 14...Bg4 is Black's best move, with more advantage for Black than after 14...Rb8.

<ToTheDeath> Thanks!

Jul-14-08   myschkin: Napier wrote in "Amenities":
"....at Monte Carlo in 1902 my opponent on the last day was Chigorin. <I decided to celebrate with a gambit, and so gave him to understand the night before>. In the morning I steered into the Evans, confident that he would not expect an opening that had scarcely been out of the stable since its crippling in the St. Petersburg event of 1896. He used the old defense. After the game he asked what new play I had in mind for Lasker's Defense, and when I replied 'None,' he said good-naturedly that I had a talent--for poker! After that agreeable little memento it was a bit comforting to receive the brilliancy prize for the game."

the good 'ol chess times :)


heart failure community and support group
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
Monte Carlo 1902
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies