chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Akiba Rubinstein vs Emanuel Lasker
Moscow (1925), Moscow URS, rd 6, Nov-16
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation (D47)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 96 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Rubinstein/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-07-06  paladin at large: Beautiful endgame by Lasker, particularly from move 32 on, when Rubinstein allowed the exchange of queens. As an endgame, it surpasses Rubinstein's win over Lasker, which Rubinstein essentially had won in the transition to the endgame. One attractive feature here is the centralization of the black minor pieces and how the white king cannot even approach the black passed pawn, as the black king walks up the board.
Jun-07-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <paladin> Here's another great Lasker ending against Rubinstein.

Lasker vs Rubinstein, 1914

Apr-06-09  Ulhumbrus: 12 Ne5 is a mistake because the N is no weapon but a target. Instead of this, 12 a4 discourages ...c5.

13 Bf3 is a defensive move, for it does not threaten to attack the long diagonal but serves only to parry Black's attack on it. It is however a consequence of Ne5.

Instead of 14 Nxd7, 14 Nd3 aims at c5.

18 Bxd4 may lead to a draw and perhaps Rubinstein plays 18 exd4 in order to avoid it. After 18 exd4, with an isolated d5 pawn but greater space, it is White who is playing for the attack and Black who is playing to simplify. The result of the game suggests that Black is advised to offer exchanges of Rooks on the c file, and indeed an open file hinders a King side attack as the defence may try to occupy it with his Rooks. This suggests that exchanging the Rooks on the c file is a mistake on White's part. Instead of 21 Rxc8, 21 Rd1 avoids the first exchange of Rooks, while 22 Rd1 or 22 Re1 instead of 22 Rc1 avoids the second exchange of Rooks.

27 a3 makes a target of the pawn and following Qc3, the recapture Bxc3 displaces the bishop which defends the a3 pawn.

Apr-06-09  Archswindler: <Ulhumbrus: Instead of this, 12 a4 discourages ...c5.>

I'm not sure it does:

12. a4 b4 13. Na2 c5

Apr-08-09  Ulhumbrus: <Archswindler> Black can still play the move ...c5, but at a price: The reply ...b4 has weakened permanently Black's entire Queen side, exposing it to attack.
Apr-08-09  Archswindler: <The reply ...b4 has weakened permanently Black's entire Queen side, exposing it to attack.>

No it hasn't.

Jun-09-09  Bridgeburner: <paladin at large>

The queen exchange was definitely the losing move, at least in the proximate sense (White was probably lost in any case), as it made the <Pa3> indefensible. Lasker played the rest of the game very nicely but it was essentially an easy, somewhat routine endgame win for him.

Rubinstein was very much off his game here...he played the opening very conservatively, never getting around to <e4>, which would have been much more competitive than allowing the lame isolani he ended up with, which in turn allowed <d5> to be occupied as a staging point for Black's pieces.

Rubinstein's middle game was even worse, with lackluster placement of pieces allowing Lasker free rein for his.

I thought Lasker's <26...Nd5>, apart from being an excellent move in its own right, was also a psychological move aimed at provoking the weakening <27.a3>, the fate of which decided the game.

<Ulhumbrus: This suggests that exchanging the Rooks on the c file is a mistake on White's part. Instead of 21 Rxc8, 21 Rd1 avoids the first exchange of Rooks, while 22 Rd1 or 22 Re1 instead of 22 Rc1 avoids the second exchange of Rooks.>

I'm not sure.If <21.Rcd1>, then <21...Nf6> and the White isolani is fully blockaded. Moreover, <22.Re1> wouldn't be a good move as it becomes a target for Black's DSB if it reaches <b4> (there's the echo of that fateful <a3> again), eg: <21.Rcd1 Nf6 22.Rfe1 Nxe4 23.Bxe4 Bb4 24.Bxb7 Qxb7 25.Qe4 Qxe4 26.Rxe4 Rc2>:


click for larger view

Such a position wouldn't be defensible against Lasker.

Sep-29-13  YoGoSuN: Can anyone care to explain why Lasker went 57. Kd3 instead of 57. Kb1? I'm sure that 57. Kd3 wins as well, but isn't it 57. Kb1 more direct and obvious?
Dec-14-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 10 b3 was a new idea that has been repeated only rarely; the sharper 10 e4 is the main line.

<Archswindler: <Ulhumbrus: Instead of this, 12 a4 discourages ...c5.> I'm not sure it does:
12. a4 b4 13. Na2 c5>

I would think that 13 Nb1 with the idea of Nbd2 and Nc4 should be considered.

After 18 exd a poor version of the Isolated Queenpawn middlegame occurred with the bishop passive on b2.

<Ulhumbrus:....
18 Bxd4 may lead to a draw and perhaps Rubinstein plays 18 exd4 in order to avoid it.>

After 18 Bxd4..e5 it looks like White is forced to play 19 Bc5 as 19 Bb2..f5 will cost White a piece.

34 Ba5..axb 35 Bxb6..Bg5! would have been winning for Black.

<YoGoSuN: Can anyone care to explain why Lasker went 57. Kd3 instead of 57. Kb1? I'm sure that 57. Kd3 wins as well, but isn't it 57. Kb1 more direct and obvious?>

57 Kb1 allows White to play Kh6,Kh7,Kg8 with dangerous counterplay. The idea behind Lasker's 57 Kd3! is to place the king on f5 when White plays Kxf7 at which point Black's knight can leisurely win the two rook pawns and then head to the queenside to force the win of the bishop.

Jul-15-17  iron john: why not 35 bb4
Jul-15-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <iron john>
<why not 35 bb4> 35. Bb4 Bxb4 36. axb4 Kf8. Black transfers his king to the queenside and eventually picks up White's b-pawn while White's pieces are tied down by Black's a-pawn. I believe that plan wins for Black.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
game 30 Rubenstein vs lasker
from Richard Reti's Masters of the Chessboard games by takchess
Technique of using d5 against an isolani
from A course of study by KramRick
86
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by Incremental
Game 86
from Why Lasker Matters (Soltis) by Qindarka
192
from Middlegame Strategy by Del ToRo
mi sistema de nimzovich
by LESTRADAR
Game 29 in Masters of the Chessboard by Richard Reti, 21st Cent
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Treasure's Ark
by Gottschalk
22 (31...?)
from Ray Keene's Good Move Guide (Keene & Whiteley) by Chessdreamer
Game 29
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by MSteen
Na:B-; 4:4||
from 37_N endgames by whiteshark
Rubinstein vs World Champions Decisive Games Lasker
from Rubinstein vs World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Game 29 in Masters of the Chessboard by Richard Reti, 21st Cent
from EG Minors Excavating the Elements by fredthebear
Game 480
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
Their sixth and last meeting - a routine win by Lasker
from Rubinstein plays Lasker by Bridgeburner
Antiochus' favorite games
by Antiochus
86
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
mid-to-end-game
by saveyougod
Game 480
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by FRoeten
game 30 Rubenstein vs lasker
from Richard Reti's Masters of the Chessboard games by Takchessbooks
plus 29 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC