|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
| Aug-15-06 |
| syracrophy: <Tommy Jensen> I appreciate your idea of 24...Qxd4 25.Rd1 Qe4 26.Bxh6 Ng6 27.Bg5, to play 27...Nf4, but after 28.Bxf4 Qxf4 29.Rh3 f6 30.Qh7+ Kf7 <not 30...Kf8 31.Rh4 Qg5 32.f4 Qb5 33.Rg4 g5 34.fxg5 and black is in huge trouble> 31.Rh4 Qg5 32.Rg4 Qh6 33.Qxh6 gxh6 34.Nc4 Rad8 35.Nxd6+ Kf8 <Obviously not 35...Ke7 36.Rg7+> 36.Rg6 Re7 37.Rxh6 Kg7 38.Rh4  click for larger viewWhite's much better, is winning |
 |
| Aug-23-06 |
| Tommy Jensen: <syracrophy> I agree that the line is very plausible up to 24.Ne3 Qxd4 25.Rd1 Qe4 26.Bxh6 Ng6 27.Bg5 Nf4 28.Bxf4 Qxf4 29.Rh3 f6 30.Qh7+ Kf7 31.Rh4 Qg5 32.Rg4 Qh6 33.Qxh6 gxh6 34.Nc4. But here instead of 34... Rad8 I would suggest 34... Red8 with the idea 35.Nxd6+ Kf8 36.Rg6? Bd5! 37.Nb5? Be4! 38.Rxf6+ Ke7 and all of a sudden it is black who is winning! White still has a large advantage after 34...Red8 35.Nxd6+ Kf8 36.Rgd4 Bc6 37.f4 (37.b5?! Bd5!) but the win is not yet completely obvious. |
 |
| Nov-24-06 |
| Total Blunder: I have a friend who was caught several times in a trap which leads into a windmill similar to this one. I call this kind of windmill after him "Renato's windmill/trap". lol |
 |
Feb-08-07
 |
| Ulhumbrus: Instead of 18...Bxg5, 18..g6 followed by ...Nxd4 gains the bishop pair. |
 |
| Feb-09-07 |
| Cyphelium: <Ulhumbrus> 18.- g6 19. h6 xd3? 20. xd3 just aids white, getting the rook ready for kingside attack. The threat is 21. xh7 followed by 22. h3. Now 20.- f5 21. xh7! obviously won't do.
The best defence (though still not very good) seems to be 20.- xg5 21. xg5 f5 (else 22. f6) 22. b5 d7 (not 22.- g7 23. xg7+ xg7 24. c7) 23. f6 d5 24. d6 eb8 25. e5 when white is clearly better. |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| Themofro: Wonderful game, gotta love the windmill tactic.
The pun is of course referring to the spectatular classic "The Seventh Seal" by Ingmar Bergman who just died yesterday. He was one of the greatest directors of all time and one whose films will live with us forever. P.S. Thanks chessgames.com |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| tacite: <Chessgames> Thanks for the pun, for this simple hommage to one of the greatest, if not the greatest movie director of the post-war era. <Themofro> You are right about Bergman's film. And in this film, the Crusador performed by Max Von Sydow plays a game of chess against Death. And against Death, there is neither a win or a draw that is possible... |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| realbrob: This looks like a Scheveningen rather than a Najdorf.. Interesting way of drawing a sort of Sicilian defense out of 1.d4, even though I don't think White often plays the Torre Attack nowadays. I saw this game annotated in a book by Garry Kasparov, and it was the first time I met the idea of the repeated discovered check by rook and bishop, usually with heavy win of material. <About the Seventh Seal> So in this game who is supposed to be Death? Torre presumably, though I think it's unfair that Death who is unbeatable plays with White. lol Anyway I think that if one wants to make the metaphor more realistic one should say you don't play a single game of chess against Death, but an infinite match composed of a lot of games... So sometimes you can win or draw, but you eventually lose. |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| tacite: So it seems that Death was playing chess against both Bergman and Antonioni. |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| unixfanatic: This is not the Sicilian Najdorf, however, it is very similar to the Hedgehog system, which is characteristic of those openings. |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| Jim Bartle: A simul, then?
Then again, as realbrob suggests, maybe God's really playing an unending six-billion board simul. |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| backyard pawn: With 24..., Qb5 Lasker hangs his queen. Now after 25 Bf6 he can't both save his queen and defend against the attack on his king. Lasker would have been better off if he had simply "passed" on his 24th move. |
 |
Jul-31-07
 |
| kevin86: Here is one case where the pun fits the GAME-and not just the name of a player. The windmill on the seventh rank by Torre certainly "tilted" the outcome of this one. Anytime Lasker lost,it was news-and especially here-in such an artistic game! |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| laskereshevsky: In the Boris Vainstejn's book on the Lasker's life and carrer, he reported this anecdote...: <The witnesses report that during the game, while Torre reflected on its difficult position, an errand boy posed in front of Lasker a telegram. Frau Marta communicated it that the commedia VOM MENSCEN DIE GESCHICHTE, wrote from he with the brother Berthold, would have been soon put in scene. Lasker, that it held always a reserved behavior, was not in degree in this occasion, to contain the own joy. This commedia was the fruit of seven years of intense job and expressed its "philosophy of the inequality". It is necessary to add that with the aid of the Berthold's wife, the poetess Else Lasker-Müller, was made it one poetic version. Those December's day in the Metropol Lasker probably lived the happyest moment in his life. He moved away from the chessboard and with emotioned mood air showed to the friends the event. It was the only circumstance in hes life when he didnt respect the rule not to be distracted from the tournament game and not to never lose the concentration. When they said it that Tower had moved, Lasker made return the chessboard and... it committed three serious consecutive mistakes! After this game Laker became unrecognizable. Find herself in a no hope's position against Duz-Chotimirskij, also ending in order to win, and little after lost against Levenfish in a finale that could have saved; Subsequently drawed with Tartakower in 17 moves. Towards the end others two draws with outsiders like Sämisch and Gottilf (in 18 moves)... It was clearly that Lasker was victim of some chess extra problems, be placed second in front of Capablanca and to all the pleiade of the best grand masters, it came however considered by all like a great success....> An interesting anectode, expecial considering that Vainstejn was a living witness of the tournament, thanks to his he partecipation in the tournament bulletin typing... |
 |
Jul-31-07
 |
| fm avari viraf: At one stage, Lasker must have thought that he almost won White's Bishop on g5 but his joy was ephemeral as Carlos Torre grinded his whole combo into the windmill where Lasker was mere a spectator. A didactic game where one learns the windmill tactics. |
 |
Jul-31-07
 |
| Rodrigo Gutierrez: This game is often considered "The Mexican Immortal" by the Chess community here in Mexico. It's an honor that it was chosen as a tribute to Bergman's life and career. Human existence is so brief and frail! In the end, Death always wins the game and would even if it played with black... |
 |
Jul-31-07
 |
| Timothy Glenn Forney: This is Torre's best game IMHO-Carlos Torre vs N Banks, 1924 |
 |
Jul-31-07
 |
| Calli: <laskereshevsky> The exact story is in Hannak's "Life of a Chess Master" which was published 30 years before Vainstein's "Thinker". (I don't know if it is really true.) |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| soberknight: Wow. That was a cool windmill. I could just imagine Torre wearing a T-shirt saying: "I sacrificed my queen, set up a windmill, and all I got was two lousy pawns" - but it was enough to win. |
 |
| Jul-31-07 |
| syracrophy: Something important to mention about this game, is that Torre said in an interview (with Gabriel Velasco): <"I really don't consider this game as a good one, since both of us commited a lot of mistakes <On my early analysis it can be explained>...I really appreciate Lasker's attacking spirit and I know that he was not at his best day..."> |
 |
Oct-13-07
 |
| Calli: Four minutes of "The Seventh Seal" is available on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyqg... |
 |
May-14-09
 |
| keypusher: <After this game Laker became unrecognizable. Find herself in a no hope's position against Duz-Chotimirskij, also ending in order to win, and little after lost against Levenfish in a finale that could have saved; Subsequently drawed with Tartakower in 17 moves. Towards the end others two draws with outsiders like Sämisch and Gottilf (in 18 moves)... >> This is a rather selective view of the rest of Lasker's tournament. The Torre game was in round 12. In round 13 he got an extremely bad position against Dus Chotmirsky and nevertheless won; but as we read in other books winning from a bad position is the very quintessence of Lasker. In round 14 he beat Marshall in an excellent game. In Round 15 came the missed draw against Levenfish, followed by a short draw against Tartakower; but in the next two rounds he beat Spielmann and Zubarev. He ended the tournament with a quiet draw against Saemisch, a great drawn battle with Bogoljubov, and another short draw against Gotthilf. But it is silly to make much of the last-round Gotthilf game. Lasker would have had to beat Bogoljubov the round before to have a realistic chance of catching him. In the final round, Bogoljubov drew in 20 moves to clinch first place, and Capablanca had a bye. So 1st, 2nd and 3rd places were all determined. Lasker certainly played worse in the second half of the tournament than in the first, and I would include the Torre game in the substandard play; as I wrote somewhere, given the number of errors by both men, maybe they both were getting handed exciting telegrams at key moments. But it isn't as if Lasker collapsed after Round 12. Maybe he got a little tired. |
 |
| Jun-05-09 |
| WhiteRook48: I've heard about this game!! But I didn't know who the players were!! |
 |
| Jun-06-09 |
| epiglottis5: <syracrophy> Is there analysis for 22...f6? It looks like white can escape with a draw. 22...f6 23.Nc4! Red8 24.Ne3 Qg6 (now white's bishop will be trapped after 25.Qxg6 Nxg6) But white has 25.Bxf6! Qxf6 26.Ng4! followed by Nh6+ with a draw by perpetual check. |
 |
| Sep-18-09 |
| WhiteRook48: 25 Bf6!! |
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing > |