chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Efim Bogoljubov vs Alexander Alekhine
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 17, Apr-09
French Defense: McCutcheon Variation. Wolf Gambit (C12)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 93 more Bogoljubov/Alekhine games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-15-03  morphynoman2: The queen's sacrifice 25... axb5 fails because 26. Rxg6 fxg6 27. Ng3 The endgame is two rocks against rock and two bishops. Nothing to do. It is a draw.
Aug-15-03  Sylvester: Alekhine kept playing this guy instead of Capablanca. Against Capa he would have to play sober and might even lose!
Jul-20-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Alekhine kicked himself because he missed 26...Qxg3! which is a puzzle-like win.

At first it looks obvious, but how do you guard e7 after White plays 27 Qxf7, and threatens both 28 Qe8+ and 28 Rh7?


click for larger view

Alekhine's solution which meets both threats is 27...axb5 28 Rh7 Qe1+ 29 Ka2 Qb4! (hard to see because of the pin that has just been created by taking the bishop)30 Rh8+ Kd7 31 Rxa8 Qc4+!

Feb-22-18  Howard: Alekhine stated in the tournament book that this game was enough to "try nerves of steel".
Aug-21-18  Howard: According to the, excellent, tournament book, 79...e5! would have won. That was the good news.

The bad news is that the winning line given in the book would have been very difficult to see over the board. The book implies that Alekine may have seen the line, but didn't want to take the chance of trying it given its apparent complexity.

Aug-21-18  Telemus: <Howard: According to the, excellent, tournament book, 79...e5! would have won. That was the good news.>

This is a tactical position, and if checked with an engine, one can find several interesting points.

I. Alekhine's line after 79.. e5 80.fxe5 is far from being forced, and it contains a major blunder (85.♖g7 holds the position). Before that White had several possibilities to improve, e.g. 80.. ♗d8 81.♖gb1.

II. Black had indeed a very promising idea at this move: 79.. ♖b2+!. Stockfish gives ∓.

Aug-22-18  Telemus: I just saw that White could even have won by 82.♖xb8 ♔xb8 83.♖e1, since Black loses first e6 and then one of the other two pawns, too. Did both grandmasters overlook this?

No! The game-score here is wrong. Alekhine played 78.. ♖g8 (instead of 78.. ♖b8 given above). Of course, my comments of yesterday become thereby irrelevant.

Aug-22-18  Telemus: Checking Alekhine's analysis after 79.. e5 again, this time with the black rook on g8, the results are not too different from yesterdays.

Again it turns out that Alekhine's line after 79.. e5 80.fxe5 is far from being forced, and it contains several sub-optimal moves. Stockfish gives triple zeros ...

---
In the final position of one of Alekhine's *winning* lines, the one after 86.♖hb7 ♗d8,


click for larger view

White isn't lost at all. White can play 87.♖d7! threatening mate, and after 87.. ♖xg4 88.♖d6+ ♔f5 89.♖f7+ White eliminates the pawn f2.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
alvis hope's favorite games
by alvishope1
47ey_RR(B) vs RBB
by whiteshark
Sylvester: "Against Capa he would have to play sober"
from Alekhine was drunk! by Calli
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by vantheanh
Super Bogo 1
by policrates
New York 1924
by JoseTigranTalFischer
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by StoppedClock
Super Bogo 1
by Nimzophile
New York 1924
by Benzol


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC