| Jun-12-03 |
| bishop: I liked Capablanca's 9...f5! reacting to Nimzovitch's passive play by seizing some space on the King side. Capa's unexpected 33...Bf2! forces checkmate. |
 |
| Jun-12-03 |
| Shadout Mapes: This is the famous Saint Sebastian tournament. Marshall had to attest for Capa in order for the organizers to allow him to compete, and Nimzovich apparently complained that Capa was too weak to play and should be sent home. In the end, Capa won first place, an acheiment which can be compared to Pillsbury at Hastings. |
 |
| Dec-26-03 |
| Lawrence: 34.Bxf5 Nxf5 35.g4 Be4+ 36.Kh2 Rh6#. (Junior 8) Gary K. says (OMGP vol.1) that Capa later claimed that his triumph in San Sebastian was even better than what Pillsbury had done in Hastings, but Gazza is having none of it because P. had to face Lasker and Capa didn't. |
 |
| Dec-26-03 |
| Benjamin Lau: According to an analysis by Glenn Giffen using chessmetrics.com's statistics, the strongest tournaments were: 1.Hastings 1895 - Pillsbury, Chigorin, Lasker, Steinitz, Tarrasch ... the whole top twelve were there. 2.Linares 1992 - World champion Gary Kasparov dominated completely making up for his recent failure at Reggio Emilia 1991/2 where he came 3rd after Viswanathan Anand and Boris Gelfand, and his poor showing at Linares the previous year where he had to cede first to Vassily Ivanchuk. An indication of his fine form was his first round victory over second place Jan Timman, a 25 move miniature where Kasparov sacrifices a knight for a mating attack. Ivanchuk, who had also recently won the Reykjavik World Cup (with Karpov), shared second with Timman ahead of Anatoly Karpov, Anand, Valery Salov and Gelfand. Spanish businessman Luis Rentero has been financing the Linares tournaments for over two decades now, and since about 1990, these tournaments have usually been among the strongest in any given year. 3.Vienna 1882 - The top nine in the world along with nine other strong players descended on Wilhelm Steinitz's old stomping ground to test their mettle against the master himself. James Mason and George Mackenzie came across from the U.S. and Simon Winawer and Mikhail Chigorin appeared from Russia making this one of the most representative international tournaments yet. Only world #10 France's Samuel Rosenthal was absent. Steinitz had not played a serious game since demolishing Blackburne +7 in a match in 1876, but he proved to be in fine form. Mackenzie, however, brought Steinitz's twenty five game winning streak to an end in the third round by managing to find a perpetual check just as Steinitz's attack was closing in. In the end, Steinitz and Winawer tied for first, played a two game playoff but split the prize after scoring one win each. 4.London 1883 - Again the top nine were all here but once again #10 was missing, this time, Alexander Wittek. Johannes Zukertort was a protege of the great Adolf Anderssen who had been brought to England by Steinitz's enemies. Up until this tournament, Steinitz had much the better of things defeating Zukertort decisively in a match, but here Zukertort finally found his form, and won the tournament. Note: the scoring system for this tournament was a bit strange. Draws were to be replayed, and if the players drew again, a third time. A player's score was given as a total out of 26 with initial draws not counting. Thus finishing order was 1.Zukertort 2.Steinitz 3.Blackburne 4.Chigorin even though by traditional methods, Blackburne had more points than Steinitz. 5.Nottingham 1936 won by Jose Raul Capablanca and Mikhail Botvinnik ahead of Reuben Fine, Samuel Reshevsky, world champion Max Euwe and Alexander Alekhine. 6.Zurich/Neuhausen Candidates 1953 won by Smyslov ahead of Bronstein, Reshevsky, Keres, Petrosian, Najdorf, Geller, Kotov, Taimanov et al. 7.Corus, Wijk aan Zee 2001 won by Kasparov ahead of Anand, Kramnik, Ivanchuk, Adams, Morozevich, Shirov, Leko, Topalov et al. |
 |
| Dec-26-03 |
| Benjamin Lau: 8.Baden-Baden 1870 won by Adolf Anderssen ahead of Wilhelm Steinitz, Gustav Neumann, Joseph Henry Blackburne and Louis Paulsen. The first tournament to be held in Germany and also the first to be interrupted by war, in this case the Franco-Prussian war that saw the unification of Germany. (Mannheim 1914 and Buenos Aires Olympiad 1939 were also interrupted in this way). The French player Stern withdrew early on, while his countryman Rosenthal defaulted games against Minckwitz and de Vere. 9.St.Petersburg 1914 won by Emanuel Lasker ahead of Jose Raul Capablanca, Alexander Alekhine, Siegbert Tarrasch, Frank Marshall, Akiba Rubinstein and Aron Nimzowitsch. Famous for the way world champion Lasker came from behind to steal first place from the new favorite, young Capablanca. Lasker won a famous game against Capablanca from the white side of the "drawish" Ruy Lopez Exchange variation. 10.Linares 1994 won by Anatoly Karpov ahead of Gary Kasparov, Alexei Shirov, Evgeni Bareev, Vladimir Kramnik and Viswanathan Anand. Before this event, Kasparov suggested that winner could be considered the world tournament champion, but perhaps spurred on by this, Karpov put in the performance of his career scoring +9=4 to finish two and a half points ahead of second place Kasparov and Shirov. 11.AVRO Amsterdam 1938 won by Paul Keres and Reuben Fine ahead of Mikhail Botvinnik, Max Euwe, Samuel Reshevsky, world champion Alexander Alekhine, Jose Raul Capablanca and Salomon Flohr. Fine established a strong lead in the first half, but lost to Keres in the seventh round and Reshevsky in the ninth, allowing Keres to catch up. The once invincible Capablanca suffered a mild stroke during the tournament which doubtless affected his play. Flohr was hampered by the fact that his native Czechoslovakia had recently been invaded by the Nazis. He eventually emigrated to the Soviet Union. http://www3.sympatico.ca/g.giffen/t... |
 |
May-21-05
 |
| notyetagm: Nice posts, Benjamin. |
 |
| May-21-05 |
| RookFile: And this is a nice game. Capablanca gives a powerful performance. |
 |
May-21-05
 |
| Boomie: The results from this tourney show that Capablanca did not win it as previously stated. San Sebastian 1911
1 Rubinstein,Akiba 10.0/15
2 Capablanca,Jose Raul 9.5/15
3 Vidmar,Milan Sr 9.0/14
4 Marshall,Frank James 8.5/14
5 Tarrasch,Siegbert 7.5/14 53.25
6 Schlechter,Carl 7.5/14 51.25
7 Nimzowitsch,Aaron 7.5/14 49.50
8 Bernstein,Ossip 7.0/14 48.00
9 Spielmann,Rudolf 7.0/14 45.00
10 Teichmann,Richard 6.5/14
11 Maroczy,Geza 6.0/14 44.00
12 Janowski,Dawid 6.0/14 35.00
13 Burn,Amos 5.0/14 35.50
14 Duras,Oldrich 5.0/14 34.50
15 Leonhardt,Paul 4.0/14 |
 |
May-21-05
 |
| Boomie: <Benjamin Lau> After looking at the Chessmetrics site, I noticed that Hastings 1895 is ranked 10th all time.
The top ten list given there is:
1. Vienna 1882
2. Linares 1993
3. Nottinghame 1936
4. Avro 1938
5. Linares 1992
6. Corus 2001
7. London 1883
8. Corus 1999
9. Linares 1994
10. Hastings 1895
|
 |
| Feb-16-06 |
| Whitehat1963: First meeting between these two, and it turns out to be a victory for Capablanca behind the black pieces. Interesting that all five of Capa's victories over Nimzo were achieved while playing black. And Nimzo never got a single game from Capa. http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... |
 |
Feb-16-06
 |
| euripides: <Boomie> perhaps your results come from a database where Rubinstein's win against Capablanca is double-counted. Hence they are recorded as playing a game more than everyone else and Rubinstein comes out ahead of Capbablanca not half a point behdin him as the books say. . The usual historical understanding is that Capablanca won the tournament:-) |
 |
| Feb-16-06 |
| Fan of Leko: <According to an analysis by Glenn Giffen using chessmetrics.com's statistics, the strongest tournaments were:> #1 has to be USSR vs. World (1970) Fischer, Spassky, Petrosian, Larsen, Tal, Keres, Korchnoi, Botvinnik, Smyslov, Portisch, Polugaevsky, Gligoric, Geller, Stein, Reshevsky, Hort, Taimanov, Uhlmann, Najdorf, Ivkov, Olafsson. |
 |
| Feb-16-06 |
| RookFile: Gee, another Nimzo vs. Capa game, and yet another example of Capa slapping Nimzo silly. |
 |
Feb-16-06
 |
| Boomie: <euripides> You are right. I was looking at Fritz's db but I forgot that I had analysed Capa's loss to Rubinstein. Fritz dutifully counted this as a round in the tourney. |
 |
| Feb-17-06 |
| Fan of Leko: <8.Baden-Baden 1870> Anyone who thinks this event was stronger than AVRO '38 should put down the crack pipe. For that matter how could Nottingham '36 be stronger than AVRO? AVRO co-winner Keres didn't even play at Nottingham, and the 3 Brits who finished last at Nottingham obviously weren't invited to AVRO. Without looking I would bet $100 that Giffen is British... |
 |
| Feb-17-06 |
| RookFile: The end of this Nimzo vs Capa game is comical. Had Capa taken white's bishop, we would have had a situation where, with white's king under attack, the 'master of strategy' has withdrawn every one of his pieces to the distant queenside. Alas, Capa prefers to set up a direct checkmating net on Nimzo right away, and leaves the bishop there. |
 |
Apr-26-06
 |
| notyetagm: This game ends with one of those famous Capablanca <zwischenzug> (in-between move). After 33 x ?, Capablanca does not play the obvious recapture 33 ... x . Instead, Capablanca sets up a mating net using the <Greco mate> pattern with 33 ... f2!. Now the White h1-king is trapped in a corridor on the open h-file (<Greco mate>) and White cannot prevent mate by the maneuver ... f6-h6. For example, if White tries to make luft to get his king off of the h-file by moving his g2-pawn out of the way (34 g3 or 34 g4), then Black simply plays 34 ... x +, covering the g2-square with tempo, and mates next move after 35 h2 h6#. |
 |
Oct-07-06
 |
| Jonathan Sarfati: Before the tournament, Nimzovich, along with fellow Russian Empire rep Ossip Bernstein, objected to Capablanca's entry because he had not yet won a master tournament. Marshall supported Capa's entry because Capa had beaten him +8-1=14 in a match two years before. In annotating Panov vs Botvinnik, 1940, Botvinnik wrote: "If during the game Panov had guessed that his strivings to depart from the thoroughly studied variations were all for nothing, and that Black was simply following Capablanca in [this game with Nimzovich], he would only have been in despair! We note only that Nimzovich did not embark on the manoeuvre Nf1-e3 [which helps Black advance f5-f4]. |
 |
| Nov-05-06 |
| mack: 5.Be2 is dire. It's not really consistent with 2.d3, is it. |
 |
Nov-05-06
 |
| Calli: Developing the Bishop at g2 is more common, but the line is not unknown, for instance, S Smagin vs K Bischoff, 1990 |
 |
| Jul-29-08 |
| maxi: The defensive move 23.g3 would have made Capa's job a lot more difficult. Capa's 27...Nce7 is a great move, made in the spirit of his opponent's teachings! |
 |
Jul-17-09
 |
| IMlday: 13.bxc5 looks like an improvement. |
 |
Jul-31-09
 |
| Knight13: <IMlday: 13.bxc5 looks like an improvement.> Indeed. White can then use the b-file and also play c4 if needed. |
 |
| Jul-31-09 |
| theagenbiteofinwit: Nimz complained about Capablanca's lack of experience, but the Cuban beat him without even having to praxis. |
 |
Jul-31-09
 |
| Knight13: <Nimz complained about Capablanca's lack of experience> Well apparently Capa did not need enough "experience" in order to beat Nimzo, which means Nimzo pretty much insinuated that Capablanca is more talented than him. |
 |
|
 |

Secrets of Opening Surprises
|
|
|