chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian
Petrosian - Spassky World Championship Match (1966), Moscow URS, rd 19, May-27
French Defense: Classical. Steinitz Variation (C11)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 4 times; par: 146 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 74 more Spassky/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-07-05  percyblakeney: This is the game in the 1966 match where Spassky equalised to 9.5-9.5. It's hard to see any advantage for white until quite late in the game, maybe it begins to go wrong for Petrosian with 36. ... bxa4. Shredder thinks g5 instead would have kept a slight advantage for black in what looks like a probable draw:


click for larger view

Nov-07-05  aw1988: In my opinion, bxa4 is simply a blunder, a shocking move by Petrosian.
Feb-29-08  Knight13: <aw1988: In my opinion, bxa4 is simply a blunder, a shocking move by Petrosian.> Not taking the pawn also loses. I don't think there's a better move.
Sep-09-08  tjipa: A great game by Spassky.
Mar-02-09  sillybilly47: Brilliant game by Spassky. Petrosian looks just fine for the first half of the game but there are some looming problems:Petrosian's queenside is somewhat weak but more serious is the fact that his pieces are completely uncoordinated(shockingly so). That Spassky does not win the match is surprising.
Mar-02-09  Petrosianic: <It's hard to see any advantage for white until quite late in the game, maybe it begins to go wrong for Petrosian with 36. ... bxa4.> Vasiliev's book on Petrosian has an incredibly fanciful account of this game. There used to be a saying about how hanging pawns "whispered to one another", and you could never quite be sure what they were whispering. In this case, according to Vasiliev, what the pawns were whispering was that they hadn't liked Black's offer to exchange Queens on Move 21. (Make of that what you will. There's no hard analysis of the game in the book, only poetry).

<That Spassky does not win the match is surprising.>

But not unprecedented. It often seems to happen that when someone struggles long and hard to equalize a deficit, that he suffers a letdown at the very moment he achieves it. Other examples: Botvinnik in 1963, Korchnoi in 1978. That's why I'm not at all sure that Kasparov would have won had the 1984/5 match continued, even if he'd managed to tie it at 5-5.

Mar-02-09  sillybilly47: Agree with your comment on Kasparov-Karpov. Karpov should have hung in there.
Dec-30-09  AnalyzeThis: He might have had a problem winning, if he had died. That was the state that his health was in.
Oct-23-10  WiseWizard: 40. fxe4 dxe4. 41 Ne6 ( attacking the Rook and going to c5 with tempo to attack the Bishop who defends the isolated pawn! let me at him let me at him) is actually a mistake! White actually gift wraps (with a bow) counterplay to Black by opening both (!) files for his Rooks. 41..Rd2 threatening Rf2 and its lights out for White's house. So White must block the second rank but with which Rook? (42. R1e2 Rd1+ Re1 [Kh2?? Rff1 and lullabies] Rd2 back to the second rank he goes) 42. R3e2 Rd3 43. Nc5 Rxc3 44. NxB RxB 45. Rxe4 g5 46. Re6 Kg6. Am i missing something?
Oct-23-10  WiseWizard: This line has some instructive qualities. It is very tempting because of all of its pluses. But you must force yourself to find the truth of the position and to find the best defense for your opponent. 40. fxe4 dxe4. The pawn is much weaker on e4 then d5 since from that square Black goes from having 3 defenders to 1 for it. He can attack this only defender with tempo it seems with Ne6 -c5. But you must buy these postional trumps and the price is 2 brand new files for Black's Rooks. After 41. Ne6 Rd2 <42. Rf1 The difference from my last post> attacks the undefended Rook while simultaneously killing Black's counterplay idea of the Rooks on the second rank while renewing the threat of Nc5. after 42...RxR+ 43. KxR Nd7 (44. Ba4 Nb6 45. Be8 [to keep the N off d7] Nc4 46.Re2 e3 and White must be careful as Black has concrete threats now. So if White is to win in this line he needs to find a strong plan on move 44. Maybe something with creating a passed pawn on the queenside. Although it looks to me like Black holds. Much respect to #10 for not falling for this. Every move has its pluses and minuses. This is why sound positional play is so strong, keep playing the moves (plans) that hold the least minuses until your opponent collapses. I have said too much.
Nov-28-15  Ulhumbrus: 36...bxa4 isolates Black's a pawn. Instead of this 36...Bc6 covers the b5 pawn, not to mention 36...g5 given by <percyblakeney>
Sep-30-16  Aunt Jemima: As I played through this game (I'm going through the whole match) and I saw black play 20...e5, I realized that if I were playing white I would suddenly feel like I'm in a little trouble. As black when I played the French, I could never seem to get in ...e5 with impunity. Seeing it from the white side of the board as I play through it today, it's pretty scary looking. I would feel like black might be stealing the initiative.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
72
from Spassky's Best Games (Cafferty) by Chessdreamer
World Championship Game #19
from WCC Index [Petrosian-Spassky 1966] by Suenteus Po
French Defense: Classical. Steinitz Variation
from yepyeni by deniznba
153
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
Spassky vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Game 120
from 150 Chess Endings by suenteus po 147
Game 19, Match tied 9 1/2-9 1/2
from 1966 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
33
from Karpov Right Plan by GregoryBattis
1966 World Championship Game #19
from Road to the Championship - Boris Spassky by suenteus po 147
Match Petrosian!
by amadeus
33
from Karpov Right Plan by cgrob
153
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Incremental
Petrosian vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
153
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Retarf
153
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by jakaiden
33
from Karpov Right Plan by oconetta
m1g19-Spassky gains victory
from Wc-Petrosian vs Spassky by kevin86
Match Spassky!
by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC