Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jackson Whipps Showalter vs Harry Nelson Pillsbury
Pillsbury - Showalter US Championship (1897), Brooklyn, New York USA, rd 14, Mar-24
Ponziani Opening: Steinitz Variation (C44)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Showalter/Pillsbury games
sac: 42...Rxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  crawfb5: <"White adopted, as in the tenth and twelfth games, the Ponziani opening, but Black varied at his seventh move and got a good defensive game. At the fourteenth move he castled on his queen's sode and White began to force the attack through the opened QB [c] file, but it was countered by Black with a strong attack against the white king, and by a temporary sacrifice of two pawns the attack was turned completely, The position became intensely complicated, and when matters were straightened out again, Black remained the exchange ahead. In the endgame Black was able to sacrifice his rook for the bishop, and matters were thus simplified into what may be called a 'book' pawn ending. Black finally winning after sixty moves.">

H. N. Pillsbury <Brooklyn Daily Eagle> 3/25/1897

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Many of the games in this match were played out to the bitter bitter end, like this one. It makes me wonder if there was some sort of ill-feeling between the two players.
Dec-15-16  Retireborn: Perhaps not, as Hooper & Whyld describe Showalter as "a genial man, much liked by his contemporaries" any case I have the impression that bitter-ending wasn't unusual in the good old days!
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Showalter and Pillsbury were friends to the end. When Pillsbury could no longer write his chess column, Showalter ghost-wrote for him.
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <<TheFocus:> Showalter and Pillsbury were friends to the end.>


<When Pillsbury could no longer write his chess column, Showalter ghost-wrote for him.>

I'm fairly certain Hilbert nailed the ghost-writer as being Walter Penn Shipley.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: I was wondering what <TheFocus>' source was.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <jnpope> <I'm fairly certain Hilbert nailed the ghost-writer as being Walter Penn Shipley.>

<zanzibar: I was wondering what <TheFocus>' source was.>

I was under the impression that Showalter ghost-wrote his column in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

So Shipley ghost-wrote the column and later Showalter took it over?

Thanks for the info.

I really need to get Hilbert's book on Shipley.

Santa? You listening?

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <Focus> Still wondering about where you garnered your impression from?

PS- Good luck with the Santa thing, all I get anymore is lumps of coal (well, mostly).

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <zanzibar: <Focus> Still wondering about where you garnered your impression from?>

I got it from <jnpope>'s website, but it was me who was at fault. Need new glasses, I guess. Or else learn how to read English.

The following is a listing of the editors for Philadelphia Inquirer from <jnpope>'s website.

<Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia, PA Editors
Pillsbury, H.N.
Shipley, W.P.
Chess Columns
1904.12.11-1905.05.28: [P#1 to P#34] Pillsbury
1905.06.04-1905.07.23: [Not numbered] Pillsbury
1905.07.30-1905.12.17: [P#A1 to P#A42] Pillsbury (w/ Shipley) 1905.12.24-1906.01.14: [P#1 to P#8] Pillsbury (w/ Shipley) 1906.02.04-1906.02.25: [P#1 to P#8] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.03.04: [Not numbered] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.03.11-1906.04.29: [P#1 to P#8] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.05.06: [P#1 to P#2] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.05.13-1906.07.01: [P#1 to P#16] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.07.08: [Not numbered] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.07.15-1906.09.16: [P#1 to P#20] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.09.23-1906.12.16: [Not numbered] Not stated (probably Shipley) 1906.12.23-1906.12.30: [P#1 to P#4] Not stated (probably Shipley) Missing Chess Columns
1905.03.19: [P#24] Missing?
1905.03.26: Incomplete?
1905.04.23: [P#29] Missing?
1905.10.08: Incomplete?
1905.11.19: Missing?
1905.11.26: Missing?
1905.12.10: Incomplete?
Columns for April 9th and April 30th (1905) were apparently published out of order. Shipley began assisting and then ghost writing the column starting in 1905.11.08. Source:
Joost van Winsen
John Hilbert>

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <TheFocus> <So Shipley ghost-wrote the column and later Showalter took it over?>

Nope, Nik, you have it wrong.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Thanks <Focus>, I'm always on the lookout for a new source (or two).
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Here's a supplemental list to O'Keefe's work:

I should fold the two together (although I think I try to give refs to original sources a little more than O'Keefe - is that true?).

Really, it would be nice to just have a cut-and-paste repository for the editor/columnist tidbits that we researchers often come across as we research some other topic. Similar to player photographs.

It's tough to really to organize notes on these interesting tidbits which are sidelines (aka diversions) to a main line of research. I do try though, keeping various folders at the ready for clippings. It would be even nicer to have a central location for this - like on <CG>.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
Game 14 -- 24 Mar 1897
from Pillsbury - Showalter 1897 match by crawfb5

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC