chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker / H Bate vs H Pillsbury / W J McLellan
Consultation game (1899), Rochester ENG, May-22
King's Gambit: Accepted. Bishop's Gambit (C33)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games more games of Emanuel Lasker / H Bate
sac: 21...Qxe4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-05-02  drukenknight: A game of interesting tactical shots throughout as Pillsbury teaches Lasker a lesson.

23 Qb4 would prevent the disastrous of loss of material, at least it looks that way.

THe first interesting tactical shot is 5...Bg4 at first 6 Qxg4 hoping to bag the R at a8 looks good but it leads to a mate (0-1) w/ blacks Q on d1 and a B on c4...But 6 Nf3 Bc4 7 d4 c6 looks like equality. Boy you hae to wonder if these old guys carried around a list of traps on index cards or something?

7...Nf6 looks like it would create more tactical oppurtunities via g4 but maybe they knew some traps off this, too. Pillsbury keeps this N on e7 through much of the game as gallant defender of the K.

9 b3 what's with the odd looking fianchetto maneuver? The B already has a diagonal. But if you look closely at the position, isn't there a shot on f7:

9 Bxf7! Qxf7 10 Nxg5 and now if 10...Qc4+ 11 Ne2 covers this and still threatens Qa5+

maybe 10...Qf6 11 Qh5+ Qg6 (blocking w/ the N looks worse) 12 Qxg6 hxg6 13 Nb5 Na6 14 Bc4 c6

and white has 4 more connected pawns for his invested B. The pawntificator would be so proud!

the same oppurtunity on move 10 only this time, only black cannot cover the fork on c7 since the QN has moved!

14...Bxd3?; huh? bang the rook in the corner, dummy.

thought you'd seen enuf?

15...f3 this is wilder yet. 16 Nxd4 fxg2+ 17 Kxg2 Qh3+ 18 Kg1 Qe3+ regains the piece with interest (18 Kf2 leads to more trouble with g3+

okay so white doesn't take the N; what if instead 16 gxf3 Qh3+ 17 Ke1 Qg2 18 Rf1 Bxa1 19 Qxa1 000

well who knows? I think Lasker messed up move 23.

Dec-20-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <23 Qb4 would prevent the disastrous of loss of material> Sorry <DK> but it is not possible as white is in check.
Feb-25-12  AlphaMale: Does anyone know the circumstances of this game? I don't even know if it's Rochester, Kent, or Rochester, NY.
Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Alpha Male> Game took place May 22 during the Kent Chess Congress on the eve of the London 1899 tournament. Lasker also had a partner, Dr. Hele Bate, of London.
Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <AlphaMale> From the <British Chess Magazine>, June 1899, p. 246:

<"...The First Kentish Congress at Rochester, on Whit-Monday and Tuesday,> [May 22-23] <however, will remain a record for success and be memorable for the galaxy of talent present when any such records as to numbers have been broken.... In addition to a contest for the championship of Kent and several other tournaments, a number of displays by chess masters were arranged. The presence of Lasker and Pillsbury on the eve of the London International Tournament was a splendid addition to the programme, and during the Congress these players, with allies, met over the board in a lively Bishop's Gambit, in which Pillsbury achieved a very fine Queen sacrfice. These masters met over the board in another way during the Congress, for as soon as they arrived they procured a set of draughtsmen, and the afternoon was spent in Lasker obtaining practical proof of Pillsbury's prowess in this direction....">

However, the BCM did not publish the game and neither player's allies were named. "Mr. Mclellan" was mentioned later in the report. He spoke at the prize-giving ceremony, describing the founding of the first chess club in Rochester way back in 1876.

Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <AlphaMale> In Dale Brandreth's book, "Lasker vs. Pillsbury", it states: <This consultation game was played at the First Congress of the Chess Union of the County of Kent at Rochester on May 22,1899>.

Lasker and Dr. Hele Bate were White, and Pillsbury and Maclellan were Black.

Pillsbury and Showalter had left for the 1899 London international tournament on May 10th, aboard the steamship, "Paris". The first round of the London tournament was on May 30th.

Feb-25-12  AlphaMale: Thanks. The King's Gambit was never a Lasker opening - too unsophisticated, too tactical. He only wheeled it out in simul or exhibition games.
Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: "However, the BCM did not publish the game"

http://books.google.com/books?id=Ro...

Feb-25-12  AlphaMale: <Dr Hele Bate>, Greek?
Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Dr Hele Bate>, Greek?

Apparently named after his mother's family. See his father's obituary: http://books.google.com/books?id=GA...

Feb-25-12  AlphaMale: Upon Pillsbury's passing, <Lasker's Chess Magazine> lamented: <A genius has gone.>
Feb-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Calli> Thanks for catching that. You'd think I could look three pages ahead.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Selected 19th century games II
by atrifix
lasker loses to the team
from KGA- Bishop Gambit by takattack
lasker loses to the team
from KGA- Bishop Gambit by takchess
Team/consultation games
by RonB52734
Lessons on the King's Gambit
from Pillsbury's Greatest Games by Kenkaku
Queen Sacrifices -3
by obrit
virgil's favorite games
by virgil


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC