chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Harry Nelson Pillsbury vs Eugene Chatard
Blindfold simul, 12b (1900), Paris FRA, Jun-27
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Variation (B02)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 525 more games of Pillsbury
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-19-06  CreamyGoodness: Wow, 6... Nb4 is a real howler. I've played the Brooklyn variation of the Alekhine and a bunch of other silly openings like the Fried Fox; they're especially delicious when your opponent gets all huffy 'n' stuffy about theory... then loses. But the thing about these openings is, you can't *keep* playing like an idiot after starting off like one.
Sep-19-06  sixfeetunder: 3... d6 and Blacks position is better than it looks.
May-13-08  Trigonometrist: This is what I would call a "dope"ning....
The under-developed K-side and the uncastled king poses a big problem.
Jul-23-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <CreamyGoodness: <Wow, 6... Nb4 is a real howler.>> Indeed, better was <6...e6>, e.g. <7.cxd5 exd5 8.Nf3 Nh6!> He can't help doing it. <9.Be2 Qd7 10.0-0 0-0-0>


click for larger view

o.k. for the club.

Jul-23-08  RookFile: I actually have dabbled with 1. e4 Nh6 was black. You're hoping that white plays 2. Bxh6, because then you have the two bishops and tremendous power on the dark squares. Unfortunately, it doesn't work out so well when white just ignores the wayward knight.
Oct-03-08  Super Chess Man: My deep analysis of the game tells me that 1 Na6 is not that good of a move !
Nov-01-08  D.Observer: 1. e4 Nh6 should be named after Eugene Chatard. This is the only time I ever saw this opening here in the site!
Dec-30-08  thebribri8: The Brooklyn Variation of the Alekhine is normally achieved by 1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 Ng8. I don't see who would take time to name this idiotic opening.
Jan-25-09  Morphischer: Is 2.Nh6 correct? It seems to me 2.Nf6 was actually played if Pillsbury played 3.e5 on the next move.
Jan-27-09  Morphischer: 2.e5 not 3.e5
Jan-29-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Morphischer: Is 2.Nh6 correct?> Well, the ♘ is already on h6.
Feb-14-09  WhiteRook48: why is 1...Nh6 the Alekhine Defense?
Mar-19-09  WhiteRook48: advantage in both material and development
Interesting. 1...h5 crashed 1. e4 in the Opening Explorer.
Mar-25-09  AnalyzeThis: Black could have safely resigned on move 8 in this game.
Mar-26-09  MaxxLange: Was playing bad openings against Pillsbury a "thing"? I had the Pillsbury.pgn file from the old U Pitt site, and it had a lot of simul games with NN playing 1...f6 against him.
Mar-26-09  AnalyzeThis: I give Pillsbury credit for avoiding 2. Bxh6. The best reply to 1....Nh6 is to leave the wayward knight there, doing nothing, and keep the dark squared bishop for yourself.
Mar-26-09  MaxxLange: <I give Pillsbury credit for avoiding 2. Bxh6> not too hard to avoid! The d-pawn is still on d2.
Apr-11-09  chessman95: <WhiteRook48: why is 1...Nh6 the Alekhine Defense?>

As <thebribri8> already pointed out, this game transposes to the Brooklyn Alekhine which is usually reached after 1.e4 Nf6 2.e5 Nh6 (?????). My guess is that the first move is a mistake, otherwise 2.e5 would not have been played.

Apr-13-09  WhiteRook48: 6....Nb4???
proof that 1...h5 smashes 1. e4
Opening Explorer
Jun-17-09  prinsallan: First two moves by black is stunningly bad- tempoloss ^^
Jun-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Calli> or any of the other usual suspects: do you know the circumstances of this game?
Jun-17-09  vonKrolock: <keypusher: <Calli> or any of the other usual suspects> "blind-simul" (online source)
Jun-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <keypusher> This game was one of twelve from the blindfold exhibition at the Cercle Philidor headquarters in Paris on June 27th, 1900, one week after the conclusion of the Paris 1900 tournament.

In the exhibition Pillsbury allowed the opponents to consult with spectators, but they were not allowed to move the pieces on the board.

An audience of over 250 people watched while Arnous de Riviere circulated between the two rows of six boards, calling out the moves in English, while Pillsbury, seated on a platform at the back of the hall, replied with extraordinary speed and precision.

Board one was occupied by Monsier Chatard. An account of the exhibition stated that Chatard was one of the strongest members of the exhibition team. It also mentioned that Chatard tried to exploit the blindness of the master by leaving the beaten track, but he only succeeded in losing time and material.

The exhibition started at 8:30 in the evening and finished at 2 in the morning, without any break. The report stated that at the conclusion of the exhibition, Pillsbury did not appear tired at all!

The final score for Pillsbury was 8 wins, 1 loss, and 3 draws. A total of 376 moves were made by Pillsbury in the 5 1/2 hour exhibition, a rate of more than one move per minute!

All of the games but one appear in this database. I will submit the missing game.

Jun-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Pawn and two> <Von Krolock> Thank you, sirs! Some of Morphy's opponents tried the same strategy in blindfold, with similarly bad results. I can't believe de Riviere was still kicking.
Nov-26-12  Morphischer: I think 1.Nf6 was written down in descriptive notation as 1.N-KB3 but due to bad handwriting, the person transcribing it read it as 1.N-KR3 (where the B looked like an R) It explains Pillsbury's 2.e5 move and Chatard moving the knight again.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: EXHIBITION (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Attacks a2/a7, b2/b7 and c2/c7 ECO B by FTB by fredthebear
Game collection: 4
by p2c
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Election Year 2016 by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Fs, f4s, f5s & f7s for Old Timey Fredthebear Fun by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from GPS Tracked Fredthebear Through the Park by fredthebear
What a silly game!
from Funny games by Benjamin Lau
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from 17 Moves or Less in Fredthebear's Lavatory by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Goering Gambit by TG Forney / Bonus Fredthebear by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Itty Bitty Dittie Fredthebear Do Wop Sha Bop by fredthebear
Why resign
from mrwonderman's favorite games by mrwonderman
zumakal blunders archivadas3
by zumakal
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from N O P Players by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Knights Add Spice I Gives Fredthebear Heartburn by fredthebear
16 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by wwall
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from P-K4 Games by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from On the Edge of Fredthebear's Cliff by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Brooklyn Var (B02) 1-0 c2 attack backfires
from Pins Ins & Outs, All Abouts Pins, Pile on, Unpin by fredthebear
Game collection: 5
by gr2ca1
Alekhine's Defense; Brooklyn Variation; Awful!
from Ware Art Thou, O' Fredthebear? Strange Days Here by fredthebear
waldorf: "black ..suddenly he was drunk as hell at the time"
from Alekhine was drunk! by Calli
plus 10 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC