|Feb-12-08|| ||plang: Timman characterized 5 cxd as a "rather unambitious continuation". After 9..exd the game had transposed to a variation of the Tarrasch Defense not thought to be particularly favorable for white. In fact, look quite illogical for white; he is two tempi behind in development and his only compensation is the black isolated d5 pawn. 10 Nb5 was new but did not work out well. It released pressure on the d5 pawn and in no way helped defend against Polgar's powerful kingside attack. Both Timman were Polgar were critical of 11 Bb2? recommending 11 Be2 instead. 17 Qd5 would have been answered by 17..Bxg3! A nice variation is 21 Nc3..Nxc3
22 Qxc3..Nxe3+ 23 fxe..Qxc3
24 Bxc3..Rxe3. Polgar gave the best response to her pawn sacrifice 22..e5!
as 23 Nxf5..Bxf5 24 Bxf5..Nxg3!
25 fxg..Nxe3 26 Bxe3..d4 27 Kh2..Rxe3
28 Nxd4..Rxe1 29 Nxc6..Re2+ 30 Kg1..Rxc6 31 Rh2..Re3 with black clearly better but the game not nearly decided yet. 24..Rxf2+ 25 Qxf2..Nxf2
26 Nf5! does not work for black. The continuation 28 Nh4..gxh 29 Rxh3..Rxf2+
30 Rxf2..Qxh3+! 31 Kxh3..Nxf2+ also loses for white. 30 Qd1 would have been answered by 30..Ncd2.
|Apr-30-12|| ||Llawdogg: 30 ... Rxf2+! Brilliant rook sacrifice!|
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC