chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Lajos Portisch vs Bent Larsen
Portisch - Larsen Candidates Quarterfinal (1977), Rotterdam NED, rd 10, Mar-26
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation. Larsen Defense (E62)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 54 more Portisch/Larsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-14-09  Dredge Rivers: The deciding game is a Candidates Match, and no kibitzing? Interesting. Especially since it involves Portisch winning, and that didn't happen too often! :)
Mar-14-09  blacksburg: jeez, i do NOT understand Larsen, his play is always so strange. i mean, what was he thinking in this game?
Mar-21-09  Dredge Rivers: <17. ... Nd7?>

It loses the exchange, at it's all downhill from there. So, what the heck?

Aug-24-11  r00ksac: 24...Ne5 'almost' holds but is quickly 'busted' by Rxe5 and quick mate on the seventh with queen and rook. Could have been an oversight.
Oct-22-15  Howard: Probably the reason never got kibitzed on until 2009 was simply that it wasn't much of a "game"---Larsen blundered, and it was all over.

Granted, it was the deciding game, but then Larsen was already down by two points with only three games left to go (and Portisch was going to be White in two of those games), so the match was pretty much decided by that point.

Oct-22-15  Howard: Not sure, by the way, why Dredge Rivers would have said that Portisch didn't win "too often". Didn't I read somewhere once that he was one of the top ten players in the world for several years ?
Oct-22-15  Everett: He didn't win <Candidates Matches> that often.

Of course he did lots of winning to get there in the first place, much more than most!

Oct-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: Is <17...Nd7> really the blunder? How else to avoid losing a piece to the threatened Bxf6? Maybe the real blunder was <15...c5>.
Oct-23-15  Howard: If I recall correctly, Pal Benko said in CL&R that 15...c5 was indeed the losing mistake because it cost the exchange. Black's game rapidly slid downhill from there.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KORCHNOI Position #7: Top Player Games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 10 March 26
from Portisch - Larsen Candidates Quarterfinal 1977 by Tabanus
Game 10
from WCC Index [Portisch-Larsen 1977] by nescio
C- fianchetto
from 98_KID_Maroczy-Bind-Structure P(c4/e4) vs P(c6/d by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC