chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Miguel A Quinteros vs Vladimir Borisovich Tukmakov
Leningrad Interzonal (1973), Leningrad URS, rd 6, Jun-09
King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Panno Variation (E63)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Quinteros/V Tukmakov game
sac: 40.Rxd6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-23-06  vmur2000: If there was not a pawn on e4 then I think black escapes this mate atleast
May-23-06  SaltiNeil: Someone please tell me it's Friday since I got all the puzzles so far this week! That would be a first.
May-23-06  gerpm: Let's have the Monday puzzle again!!!
May-23-06  KingV93: Got this one right away. First time that's happened when all the kibitzing wasn't about how darn easy the puzzle is.
May-23-06  Whitehat1963: I saw the trap, but I was looking at a different move order, with Bg5 first. I suppose that doesn't work though, right?
May-23-06  avicell: 40.Bg5 was my answer. It transposes to this checkmate, or, if black responds with 40...Kg7, white gets the bishop with 41.Rxd6. But I like Quinteros' solution better. It forces mate.
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  RandomVisitor: On 40.Bg5+ Black has Ke6! with advantage to Black.
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <RandomVisitor> Should have been clearer. I was mainly speculating about thought processes: Black clearly had no sense of any danger, whatsoever. This was all played just before the time control and it would have been so easy to do the "wiggle" <39...Kg8 40.Ra8+ Kf7 41.Ra7...> with suddenly a ton of time to think, or adjourn. It does allow the <39...Kg8 40.exf5 gxf5 41.Raa5 ...> line, but that looks decent as well. Soviets were generally urged to take clock-time gaining oportunities like this, especially before adjournments.
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I got this one! White clears the way for the rook's control of the seventh row-checks with the bishop and mates with the rook in elegant fashion.
May-23-06  EmperorAtahualpa: One of the harder Tuesday puzzles, but I still found the entire combination.
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Got it. I saw that the rook sac 40. Rxd6 cxd6 made the Black king's position much less secure by opening the 7th rank for the other rook.

Then I noticed that 41. Bg5+ created an interesting variation of the familiar rook+bishop mating pattern, where the king is trapped by his own pawns. Black can delay mate by trading his queen for the bishop, but of course that would be futile.

May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: This puzzle is in the book "Combination Challenge" by Hays and Hall. I recommend everyone study that book, but an even better one is the Informant book "Encyclopedia of Chess Middlegames"
May-23-06  HoopDreams: i found the solution in about 1 second, blacks king is trapped !
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <kennel46> 40.f3 Qxf3 41.Rxd6 Ke7 42.Bc5 Qe2+... and it looks like Black has a draw by perpetual.
May-23-06  brainzugzwang: Have the tournament book, so had to DQ myself from this one. Remember it because it took me FOREVER to figure out the mate.

<OBIT> Yes, the editors said 39... Kf6 was time pressure and gave it ??

<Marco65> The book says Black did resign at that point. Anyone have a definite answer?

May-23-06  Halldor: The text was the first move I checked but very briefly among other moves (didn't see the mate then). I also tried to trap the queen for a few seconds. Then I tried 40.Bg5 and then I saw the rook+bishop mating pattern (as <YouRang> mentioned) - and that 40.Rxd6+ should come first. Very good puzzle.
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  dzechiel: <Marco65> It didn't occur to me that you might be doing your opponent a favor by alowing him to administer mate.

When a game becomes hopeless for me, I just resign and congratulate my opponent on his play (unless, of course, I made a terrible blunder! :D).

So, what's the general opinion of the players here? Is it "gentlemanly" to allow your opponent to administer checkmate if he has sprung a dazzling combination on you? Or are you in effect saying, "Play it out, I want to see if you can do it." If you resign the moment you know the position is completely lost, is that gentlemanly?

What if the position is just "lost", but there's a 1% chance your opponent might screw up? How about when you are completely lost, but you know that your opponent is considerably weaker than you and he might blow the win? Is it rude to play on?

May-23-06  unferth: <dzechiel> In the event of a truly dazzling combo, I might play on with a smile, at least if I was on good terms with my opponent. If it's simply a lost position but there's enough complexity to leave some doubt, then I would certainly play on unless my opponent was significantly stronger. Against a considerably weaker opponent, I would by all means play on until things were clearcut. I once blundered a queen to a D player in the early middlegame in the first round of a tournament, and I still managed to pull out the point. On the other hand, making a strong opponent play to mate in a clearcut position with no time pressure is just insulting, IMO.
May-23-06  NOKRO: Got the puzzle in one min. Man I am good!
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OBIT: Well, now, let's think about this resignation issue from a purely mathematical standpoint. If you resign, your mathematical expectation is obviously zero, while playing on always gives you an expectation greater than zero - in a ridiculously lost postion, it may be very *close* to zero, but it is always *more* than zero. Let's not forget that life insurance actuaries estimate that, assuming you are in good health, your odds of dying during the next hour are about 8 million to one, and I'd imagine those odds go up during a chess game, considering how chess is a stressful activity that can elevate blood pressure and potentially mess up your body and all. Therefore, the way to maximize your winning chances in a clearly lost position is:

First, always play the game out to mate.

Second, when you see mate in unavoidable, let all the time run off your clock before you move again. Aside from maximizing the odds that your opponent dies before you finally move, there is the added possibility this action will push a marginally unstable opponent into full-blown bug-eyed hysteria. And, we all know there are plenty of players like *that* in the chess arena.

May-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  RandomVisitor: <OBIT><Well, now, let's think about this resignation issue from a purely mathematical standpoint>If we follow your logic, then every game you lose you "waste" roughly 1 hour trying for that 1 in 100 game where your opponent screws up. This activity perhaps raises your rating by 5 points. Meanwhile, if you resigned these "lost" games and spent the extra time reading chess books or reviewing opening books, your rating might go up 20 points. So, from a mathematical standpoint, it might not pay to play each game out to mate.
May-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <dzechiel> IMO, it's apprpriate to resign if:

(1) you see a clear-cut way for your opponent to win, and you are conviced that your opponent sees it too.

(2) you have lost interest in the game (probably because you have blundered).

In training games, I think it is best to play on to mate. The point of playing is to learn, and one can learn some things even from a lost posoition.

In a friendly game, I don't have a problem playing to mate (or if my opponent plays to mate). Maybe you can get a swindle! It's just for fun, right?

In a serious/tournament game, you might play to mate in an obviously lost position as a way to congratulate your opponent's stellar play.

May-27-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: After the sham decoy sacrifice 40. Rxd6+! Black must surrender his Queen to avoid the game's slightly quicker mate.
May-18-09  WhiteRook48: 40 Rxd6+!!
Dec-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: Game Collection: Capturing removes the guard twice: D&D

Quinteros vs V Tukmakov, 1973 40 Rd5xBd6+! destroys d6-bishop protect, deflects c7-pawn poser

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
40. Rxd6+!
from Mating Attack by Jaredfchess
K's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Panno Var (E63) 1-0Magical Mate
from Roundhouse RUUK Manuevers To & Fro-edthebear by fredthebear
Games from Argentina
by Gottschalk
40.? (May 23, 2006)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
En prise's favorite games
by En prise
40. Rxd6+!
from Mating Attack Compiled by patzer2 by fredthebear
K's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Panno Var (E63) 1-0Magical Mate
from EG Rook Plus Endgames by fredthebear
40.? (Tuesday, May 23)
from Puzzle of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
bishop and pawn cannot hold back two rooks
from magic endings by kevin86
Interzonals 1973: Leningrad
by capybara
K's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Panno Var (E63) 1-0Magical Mate
from 1970s Nixon, Scooby D, Jaws, BJK, Disco, Evil Kn by fredthebear
jepflast's game collection 2
by jepflast
Miguel Quinteros (1947-)
from Player of the day: notable game III by nikolaas
40 Rd5xBd6+! destroys d6-bishop protect, deflects c7-pawn poser
from CAPTURING REMOVES THE GUARD TWICE: D&D by notyetagm
40. White to Move (Always be Aggressive!)
from Endgames That Need to be Mastered by Mating Net
K's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Panno Var (E63) 1-0Magical Mate
from Cats, KIDS playing in the Gruenfelds by fredthebear
40. Rxd6+!
from Mating Attack by patzer2
K's Indian Defense: Fianchetto. Panno Var (E63) 1-0Magical Mate
from KID Warlords Roast Fredthebear by fredthebear
A bishop on the two towers
from Puzzling endings by kidster
shakman's favorite games - 2
by shakman
plus 3 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC